The Impact of Administrator Willingness on Website E-Participation: Some Evidence from Municipalities

ABSTRACT The rapid development of information and communication technologies (ICT) has led to the rise of e-participation, whereby governments adopt digital tools to promote citizen involvement. Disparities exist, however, among jurisdictions concerning the opportunities they offer residents; some governments have extensive online participation forums while others do not. Research to explain the diffusion of e-participation has examined the roles of various kinds of governmental capacity and some other factors, including political culture and jurisdiction size. Researchers have paid less attention to the role of administrator willingness, that is to say whether administrators want to use ICT to advance participation. With data from municipal managers/business administrators in New Jersey, this exploratory study found that administrator willingness has significant impact on e-participation offerings, both directly and indirectly. Governments where the senior administrator has stronger willingness to involve citizens and use ICT are more likely to have more extensive e-participation offerings.

[1]  C. King,et al.  Should We Be Teaching Public Participation? Student Responses and MPA Program Practices , 2012 .

[2]  Rony Medaglia,et al.  eParticipation research: Moving characterization forward (2006-2011) , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[3]  Ahmad A. Kardan,et al.  Is e-government a way to e-democracy?: A longitudinal study of the Iranian situation , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[4]  Jonathan Mellon,et al.  The Effect of Bureaucratic Responsiveness on Citizen Participation , 2017 .

[5]  Jooho Lee,et al.  E‐Participation, Transparency, and Trust in Local Government , 2012 .

[6]  Efthimios Tambouris,et al.  eParticipation Initiatives in Europe: Learning from Practitioners , 2010, ePart.

[7]  Kaifeng Yang,et al.  Citizen Involvement Efforts and Bureaucratic Responsiveness: Participatory Values, Stakeholder Pressures, and Administrative Practicality , 2007 .

[8]  H. Addams,et al.  Critical Factors for Enhancing Municipal Public Hearings , 2005 .

[9]  K. V. Andersen,et al.  Costs of e‐participation: the management challenges , 2007 .

[10]  Marc Holzer,et al.  The impact of government form on e-participation: A study of New Jersey municipalities , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[11]  Stuart Bretschneider,et al.  Local government information technology capacity: an exploratory theory , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[12]  Gareth R. Jones,et al.  Understanding and Managing Organizational Behavior , 1995 .

[13]  Ann Macintosh,et al.  E-participation and Governance: Widening the net , 2005 .

[14]  Rony Medaglia,et al.  Measuring the diffusion of eParticipation: A survey on Italian local government , 2007, Inf. Polity.

[15]  N. Grassly,et al.  United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs/population Division , 2022 .

[16]  J. C. Thomas,et al.  The New Face of Government: Citizen-Initiated Contacts in the Era of E-Government , 2003 .

[17]  Montgomery Van Wart,et al.  When Public Participation in Administration Leads to Trust: An Empirical Assessment of Managers’ Perceptions , 2007 .

[18]  W. Hatcher The Efficacy of public Participation in municipal Budgeting: An Exploratory Survey of officials in Government finance officers Association's Award-Winning Cities , 2015 .

[19]  Shah Jahan Miah,et al.  An Infrastructure for implementing e-Participation services in developing countries , 2009, 2009 3rd IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies.

[20]  Terry L. Cooper,et al.  Challenges in Enhancing Responsiveness in Neighborhood Governance , 2007 .

[21]  A. Kakabadse,et al.  Reinventing the Democratic Governance Project through Information Technology? A Growing Agenda for Debate , 2003 .

[22]  Clelia Colombo,et al.  e-Participation Experiences and Local Government in Catalonia: An Explanatory Analysis , 2010, ePart.

[23]  D. Moynihan Normative and Instrumental Perspectives on Public Participation , 2003 .

[24]  Francisco Paulo Jamil Almeida Marques Government and e-participation programs: A study of the challenges faced by institutional projects , 2010, First Monday.

[25]  D. Norris,et al.  Local E‐Government in the United States: Transformation or Incremental Change? , 2013 .

[26]  Christopher G. Reddick,et al.  The Use of ICT for Open Government in U. S. Municipalities , 2014 .

[27]  H. Schachter,et al.  Educating Administrators to Interact with Citizens: A Research Note , 2003 .

[28]  L. Tummers,et al.  Behavioral Public Administration: Combining Insights from Public Administration and Psychology , 2016 .

[29]  Yueping Zheng EXPLAINING GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE ON E-PARTICIPATION IN NEW JERSEY: GOVERNMENT CAPACITY AND WILLINGNESS , 2015 .

[30]  Thomas Andrew Bryer Explaining Responsiveness in Collaboration: Administrator and Citizen Role Perceptions , 2009 .

[31]  Marc Holzer,et al.  Sixth Global E-Governance Survey: A Longitudinal Assessment of Municipal Websites Throughout the World Digital Governance in Municipalities Worldwide (2013-14) , 2013 .

[32]  S. Wright The Role of the Moderator: Problems and Possibilities’ , 2009 .

[33]  Simona Milio Can Administrative Capacity Explain Differences in Regional Performances? Evidence from Structural Funds Implementation in Southern Italy , 2007 .

[34]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  A framework of ICT exploitation for e-participation initiatives , 2008, CACM.

[35]  Patrick Dunleavy,et al.  Cultural Barriers to e-government , 2002 .

[36]  Jeremy L. Hall The Forgotten Regional Organizations: Creating Capacity for Economic Development , 2008 .

[37]  Mark D. Robbins,et al.  Citizens and Resource Allocation: Improving Decision Making with Interactive Web‐Based Citizen Participation , 2008 .

[38]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[39]  C. King,et al.  The Question of Participation: Toward Authentic Public Participation in Public Administration , 1998 .

[40]  Åke Grönlund,et al.  DoIT Right: Measuring Effectiveness of Different eConsultation Designs , 2009, ePart.

[41]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[42]  Rosemary O'Leary,et al.  The Future of Public Administration around the World: The Minnowbrook Perspective , 2010 .