The design and usability evaluation of a monitoring and feedback system for stroke survivors

The impact of stroke on the world is significant, with high disability rates among survivors and rising costs in healthcare. Therefore, new healthcare strategies and technological solutions should be found in stroke care. Is it possible to reduce healthcare costs, and at the same time make treatment more efficient? It has already been shown that specialized stroke care improves health and economic outcomes. Furthermore, Monitoring patients in their homes, using telemedicine techniques, can lead to better health care at lower costs. Both imply increased demand of new healthcare strategies and technological solutions. If monitoring stroke survivors in their home environment is the solution for a reduction in healthcare cost and a more efficient treatment plan, what information is missing in order to implement such technical solutions in healthcare? Stroke survivors are trained to recover adequate control over their movements with the objective to optimize their daily-life functional performance. While, the main objective of the rehabilitation program is to maximize the functional performance at home, the actual performance of patients in their home environment is unknown. Therefore, daily-life monitoring of the quality of movement during functional activities of stroke survivors in their physical interaction with the environment is essential for optimal guidance of rehabilitation therapy. There are several challenges in performing a quantitative and qualitative analysis of daily-life performance using telemedicine technology, compared to clinically assess motor capacity using standardized clinical tests. This includes: the development of new metrics for quantifying movement during daily-life, the absence of context when measuring movements without any visual reference, which is available in clinic but not available in a daily-life setting and finally, the presentation of large amount of movement data to care-professionals. Therefore, there is a need to investigate into how stroke survivors can be monitored during daily-life, which telemonitoring technology to include and what to present to care-professionals. This thesis, supported by the FP7 project INTERACTION, addresses two main objectives: 1) to develop and evaluate a tele-supervision system and intelligent on-body feedback technology for monitoring and coaching stroke survivors in a home environment and 2) develop and evaluate new quality of movement metrics in stroke survivors. The research presented in this thesis has contributed to both fundamental and applied areas of science and also has an important (potential) societal impact regarding diagnostics and treatment of (stroke) survivors by enabling quantitative monitoring during daily-life activities. A literature survey on telemedicine systems presented new insights which can help researchers in optimizing their usability strategies during system development and predicting future trends in usability evaluation strategies. In a multidisciplinary team, with particular focus on the telemonitoring aspects, a full-body inertial sensing system, unobtrusive to wear by stroke survivors during daily-life was realised. This system is named: INTERACTION. This system was used to monitor stroke survivors at home to gain new insights into the performance of these patients during daily-life activities. Clinically relevant Quality of Movement (QoM) metrics were developed, implemented and evaluated, enabling new insights into the differences between in-clinic and outpatient measurements of stroke survivors over longer periods of time. This in turn might assist care-professionals in understanding what is happening with stroke survivors after discharge from the hospital to their homes. In addition to the INTERACTION system, a reduced sensor system (the “Arm Usage Coach”), capable of monitoring and coaching stroke survivors by giving feedback based on arm movement activity, was designed, implemented and evaluated. This, in turn might engage patients in using their impaired arm more often during daily-life activities. It was found that stroke survivors prefer vibrotactile feedback as a feedback method, which sets the foundation for other researchers in developing assistive technological devices for stroke survivors. Insights on the opinions given by care-professionals in using inertial motion capture as an assistive technology, including working with QoM metrics as opposed to traditional clinical assessments, was given. Developers in assistive devices for healthcare still face the problem that many care-professionals slowly adapt new technology into their daily-practices. The findings presented in this thesis might help other developers in understanding what is important, in our case related to an inertial motion capture system and associated metrics, and take new approaches in designing and introducing assistive devices into daily practices. For taking the research presented in this thesis further, it would be interesting to investigate into the optimisation of INTERACTION and the motivational aspects of the patient for performing in clinic and at home. If the INTERACTION system can be less obtrusive to wear by patients and implemented on a larger scale, we can gain more knowledge from a wider variety of stroke patients. Big data approaches can be used to analyse the data, see trends over time and gain more insights into the usage of the system. If so, it might result in a change in therapy of stroke survivors and outpatient, ambulant monitoring and coaching will increase.

[1]  J. Marney,et al.  Changing Patterns , 2019 .

[2]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[3]  D. James Continuous monitoring. , 1979, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[4]  R. Lyle A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research , 1981, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[5]  D. Wade,et al.  Walking after stroke. Measurement and recovery over the first 3 months. , 2020, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[6]  M. Roth A quantitative assessment , 1987 .

[7]  A. Bohm,et al.  References on chapter I , 1989 .

[8]  K. Berg Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument , 1989 .

[9]  Diane Podsiadlo,et al.  The Timed “Up & Go”: A Test of Basic Functional Mobility for Frail Elderly Persons , 1991, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[10]  S. Olney,et al.  Feedback of ankle joint angle and soleus electromyography in the rehabilitation of hemiplegic gait. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  Richard Barker,et al.  CASE method fast-track - a RAD approach , 1994 .

[12]  James R. Lewis,et al.  IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: Psychometric evaluation and instructions for use , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[13]  V. L. Nickel,et al.  Gait parameters following stroke: a practical assessment. , 1995, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[14]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale , 1996 .

[15]  J. Holmes,et al.  Lifetime cost of stroke in the United States. , 1996, Stroke.

[16]  B. E. Maki,et al.  Gait Changes in Older Adults: Predictors of Falls or Indicators of Fear? , 1997, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[17]  Michael Jackson,et al.  The meaning of requirements , 1997, Ann. Softw. Eng..

[18]  R. Marteniuk,et al.  Acquisition of a multi-articular kicking task: Jerk analysis demonstrates movements do not become smoother with learning , 1997 .

[19]  S. Satya‐Murti Evidence-based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM , 1997 .

[20]  P. Goldie,et al.  Systematic and random error in repeated measurements of temporal and distance parameters of gait after stroke. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[21]  Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals ( VDTs ) — Part 11 : Guidance on usability , 1998 .

[22]  P. Haggard,et al.  Concurrent Performance of Cognitive and Motor Tasks in Neurological Rehabilitation , 1998 .

[23]  R. Moe-Nilssen,et al.  A new method for evaluating motor control in gait under real-life environmental conditions. Part 1: The instrument. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[24]  J. Moreland,et al.  Electromyographic biofeedback to improve lower extremity function after stroke: a meta-analysis. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[25]  L. Stone,et al.  Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror , 1999, The Lancet.

[26]  Yueting Zhuang,et al.  Video motion capture using feature tracking and skeleton reconstruction , 1999, Proceedings 1999 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. 99CH36348).

[27]  R. Kane,et al.  The cost effectiveness of post-acute care for elderly Medicare beneficiaries. , 2000, Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing.

[28]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[29]  P. Pound,et al.  A critical review of the concept of patient motivation in the literature on physical rehabilitation. , 2000, Social science & medicine.

[30]  R. Tallis,et al.  Dual-task effects of talking while walking on velocity and balance following a stroke. , 2001, Age and ageing.

[31]  M. A. Bowman,et al.  A review of the evidence for the use of phytoestrogens as a replacement for traditional estrogen replacement therapy. , 2001, Archives of internal medicine.

[32]  R. Martell At a stroke. , 2001, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[33]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Gait variability and fall risk in community-living older adults: a 1-year prospective study. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[34]  B. Johansson,et al.  Acupuncture and Transcutaneous Nerve Stimulation in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Randomized, Controlled Trial , 2001, Stroke.

[35]  S. Black,et al.  The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke: A Critical Review of Its Measurement Properties , 2002, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[36]  C. Wolfe,et al.  The Concept of Patient Motivation: A Qualitative Analysis of Stroke Professionals’ Attitudes , 2002, Stroke.

[37]  R. D'Agostino,et al.  The influence of gender and age on disability following ischemic stroke: the Framingham study. , 2003, Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association.

[38]  E. Vandenbussche,et al.  Upper Limb Exteroceptive Somatosensory and Proprioceptive Sensory Afferent Modulation of Hemispatial Neglect , 2003, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[39]  Sari Kujala,et al.  User involvement: A review of the benefits and challenges , 2003, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[40]  M. Morari,et al.  Robotic Orthosis Lokomat: A Rehabilitation and Research Tool , 2003, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.

[41]  P. Haggard,et al.  Changing patterns of cognitive-motor interference (CMI) over time during recovery from stroke , 2003, Clinical rehabilitation.

[42]  Helen C Noel,et al.  Home telehealth reduces healthcare costs. , 2004, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[43]  W. Byblow,et al.  Neurophysiological and behavioural adaptations to a bilateral training intervention in individuals following stroke , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[44]  K. Kawahira,et al.  New functional vibratory stimulation device for extremities in patients with stroke , 2004, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[45]  A. Oving,et al.  Vibrotactile movement initiation , 2004 .

[46]  R. Dickstein,et al.  Motor imagery for gait rehabilitation in post-stroke hemiparesis. , 2004, Physical therapy.

[47]  E. Roth,et al.  Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention; the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; the Council on Nutrition, Physical , 2004, Circulation.

[48]  S. Page,et al.  Effects of mental practice on affected limb use and function in chronic stroke. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[49]  W. Rymer,et al.  Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study , 2006, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[50]  M. Weinrich,et al.  Stroke Rehabilitation in Switzerland versus the United States: A Preliminary Comparison , 2005, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[51]  E. Taub,et al.  Distributed form of constraint-induced movement therapy improves functional outcome and quality of life after stroke. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[52]  Sang M. Lee,et al.  Assessing the Reliability, Validity and Adaptability of PSSUQ , 2005, AMCIS.

[53]  Aftab E. Patla,et al.  Adaptations of walking pattern on a compliant surface to regulate dynamic stability , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[54]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Functional recovery after stroke: a review of current developments in stroke rehabilitation research. , 2006, Reviews on recent clinical trials.

[55]  A. Patla,et al.  Adaptations of Walking Pattern on A Compliant Surface to Regulate Dynamic Stability , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[56]  D. Peterson,et al.  Ethics and assistive technology service provision , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[57]  H. Stam,et al.  Neuromuscular electric stimulation effect on lower-extremity motor recovery and gait kinematics of patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[58]  J. Cleland,et al.  Telemonitoring or structured telephone support programmes for patients with chronic heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[59]  J. Bussmann,et al.  The stroke upper-limb activity monitor: its sensitivity to measure hemiplegic upper-limb activity during daily life. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[60]  L. Rönnqvist,et al.  Kinematic analysis of unimanual reaching and grasping movements in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[61]  James T. Miller,et al.  An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[62]  J. Dewald,et al.  Augmenting Clinical Evaluation of Hemiparetic Arm Movement With a Laboratory-Based Quantitative Measurement of Kinematics as a Function of Limb Loading , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[63]  Antonio Moreno,et al.  Computer-based execution of clinical guidelines: A review , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[64]  R. Dickstein Rehabilitation of gait speed after stroke: a critical review of intervention approaches. , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[65]  M. Weatherall,et al.  Mobility beyond the clinic: the effect of environment on gait and its measurement in community-ambulant stroke survivors , 2008, Clinical rehabilitation.

[66]  K. Tong,et al.  Evaluation of velocity-dependent performance of the spastic elbow during voluntary movements. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[67]  Katherine J. Kuchenbecker,et al.  Vibrotactile feedback system for intuitive upper-limb rehabilitation , 2009, World Haptics 2009 - Third Joint EuroHaptics conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems.

[68]  K. Putman,et al.  European Comparison of Stroke Rehabilitation , 2009, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[69]  Philip T. Kortum,et al.  Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale , 2009 .

[70]  A. Di Carlo Human and economic burden of stroke. , 2009, Age and ageing.

[71]  Chitralakshmi K. Balasubramanian,et al.  Variability in spatiotemporal step characteristics and its relationship to walking performance post-stroke. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[72]  J. Bussmann,et al.  Ambulatory activity monitoring: Progress in measurement of activity, posture, and specific motion patterns in daily life. , 2009 .

[73]  A. de Silvestri,et al.  A meta-analysis of remote monitoring of heart failure patients. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[74]  Darryl Charles,et al.  Optimising engagement for stroke rehabilitation using serious games , 2009, The Visual Computer.

[75]  D. Roetenberg,et al.  Xsens MVN: Full 6DOF Human Motion Tracking Using Miniature Inertial Sensors , 2009 .

[76]  Isaac Skog,et al.  Zero-Velocity Detection—An Algorithm Evaluation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[77]  Yeh-Liang Hsu,et al.  A Review of Accelerometry-Based Wearable Motion Detectors for Physical Activity Monitoring , 2010, Sensors.

[78]  H. Hermens,et al.  Nature, timing, frequency and type of augmented feedback; does it influence motor relearning of the hemiparetic arm after stroke? A systematic review , 2010, Disability and rehabilitation.

[79]  H. Hermens,et al.  Remote care nearby , 2010, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[80]  A. Karduna,et al.  The reliability of side to side measurements of upper extremity activity levels in healthy subjects , 2010, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[81]  Grant D. Huang,et al.  Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[82]  G. Fulk,et al.  Predicting home and community walking activity in people with stroke. , 2010, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[83]  J. Burridge,et al.  Potential for new technologies in clinical practice. , 2010, Current opinion in neurology.

[84]  S. Engelborghs,et al.  Monitoring of physical activity after stroke: a systematic review of accelerometry-based measures. , 2010, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[85]  H. Hermens,et al.  A scenario guideline for designing new teletreatments: a multidisciplinary approach , 2010, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[86]  J Maxwell Donelan,et al.  Dynamic Principles of Gait and Their Clinical Implications , 2010, Physical Therapy.

[87]  A. Mcgregor,et al.  Body-Worn Sensor Design: What Do Patients and Clinicians Want? , 2011, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[88]  I. W. Molenaar,et al.  Measuring upper limb capacity in patients after stroke: reliability and validity of the stroke upper limb capacity scale. , 2011, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[89]  C. Holly Structured telephone support or telemonitoring programmes for patients with chronic heart failure , 2011 .

[90]  M Masseroli,et al.  Telemedicine and E-Health , 2011, IEEE Pulse.

[91]  M. Kafri,et al.  Nintendo Wii Sports and Wii Fit Game Analysis, Validation, and Application to Stroke Rehabilitation , 2011, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[92]  Kyler M. Godwin,et al.  Cost Associated with Stroke: Outpatient Rehabilitative Services and Medication , 2011, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[93]  Sethuraman Panchanathan,et al.  Design, Implementation, and Case Study of a Pragmatic Vibrotactile Belt , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[94]  M. Molinari,et al.  Rehabilitation of gait after stroke: a review towards a top-down approach , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[95]  H. Bruyninckx,et al.  Three-dimensional upper limb movement characteristics in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy and typically developing children. , 2011, Research in developmental disabilities.

[96]  A. B. Shil,et al.  Functional Recovery After Stroke , 2011, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[97]  Katherine J. Kuchenbecker,et al.  Lessons in using vibrotactile feedback to guide fast arm motions , 2011, 2011 IEEE World Haptics Conference.

[98]  J. Bussmann,et al.  Quantifying nonuse in chronic stroke patients: a study into paretic, nonparetic, and bimanual upper-limb use in daily life. , 2012, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[99]  B. Greenfield,et al.  Technology in Rehabilitation: Ethical and Curricular Implications for Physical Therapist Education , 2012 .

[100]  C. Wall,et al.  The effect of vibrotactile feedback on postural sway during locomotor activities , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[101]  M. Popovic,et al.  Relationship between clinical assessments of function and measurements from an upper-limb robotic rehabilitation device in cervical spinal cord injury , 2022 .

[102]  I-Ming Chen,et al.  Visual Cue and Vibrotactile in Series Configuration: Multimodal Feedback Design for Arm Posture Correction , 2012 .

[103]  Hermie Hermens,et al.  A framework for the comparison of mobile patient monitoring systems , 2012, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[104]  Gianluigi Ferrari,et al.  BSN-Based Activity Classification: A Low Complexity Windowing-&-Classification Approach , 2012 .

[105]  Philippe Fraisse,et al.  Estimation of the center of mass with Kinect and Wii balance board , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[106]  A. M. Zee Priority Medicines for Europe and the World "A Public Health Approach to Innovation" , 2013 .

[107]  R. Riener,et al.  Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review , 2012, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[108]  Mary G. George,et al.  An Updated Definition of Stroke for the 21st Century: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association , 2013, Stroke.

[109]  Ming Yang,et al.  3D Convolutional Neural Networks for Human Action Recognition , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[110]  Martin J. Russell,et al.  CogWatch - Automated Assistance and Rehabilitation of Stroke-Induced Action Disorders in the Home Environment , 2013, HCI.

[111]  S. Quaglini Making Healthcare More Accessible , Better , Faster , and Cheaper : The MobiGuide Project , 2013 .

[112]  J. Ferri,et al.  Efficacy of Armeo® Spring during the chronic phase of stroke. Study in mild to moderate cases of hemiparesis. , 2013, Neurologia.

[113]  Edoardo Battaglia,et al.  Exploiting hand kinematic synergies and wearable under-sensing for hand functional grasp recognition , 2014, 2014 4th International Conference on Wireless Mobile Communication and Healthcare - Transforming Healthcare Through Innovations in Mobile and Wireless Technologies (MOBIHEALTH).

[114]  Alessandro Tognetti,et al.  A Full Body Sensing System for Monitoring Stroke Patients in a Home Environment , 2014, BIOSTEC.

[115]  Fokke B. van Meulen,et al.  Assessment of Daily-Life Reaching Performance After Stroke , 2014, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[116]  Fokke B. van Meulen,et al.  A System for Monitoring Stroke Patients in a Home Environment , 2014, HEALTHINF.

[117]  Xi Chen,et al.  Classifying and visualizing motion capture sequences using deep neural networks , 2013, 2014 International Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Applications (VISAPP).

[118]  Alessandro Tognetti,et al.  Daily-life tele-monitoring of motor performance in stroke survivors , 2014 .

[119]  E. Arias,et al.  Mortality in the United States, 2013. , 2014, NCHS data brief.

[120]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Physical Rehabilitation Approaches for the Recovery of Function and Mobility After Stroke: Major Update , 2014 .

[121]  J. Burridge,et al.  Translation of evidence-based Assistive Technologies into stroke rehabilitation: users’ perceptions of the barriers and opportunities , 2014, BMC Health Services Research.

[122]  J. Takács,et al.  Validation of the Fitbit One activity monitor device during treadmill walking. , 2014, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[123]  Dae-Hyouk Bang,et al.  Effect of Unstable Surface Training on Walking Ability in Stroke Patients , 2014, Journal of physical therapy science.

[124]  Diego Torricelli,et al.  Quantitative assessment based on kinematic measures of functional impairments during upper extremity movements: A review. , 2014, Clinical biomechanics.

[125]  Rita Paradiso,et al.  Textile sensing platforms for remote monitoring of physical interaction with the environment , 2014, 2014 8th International Symposium on Medical Information and Communication Technology (ISMICT).

[126]  Rieks op den Akker,et al.  Tailored motivational message generation: A model and practical framework for real-time physical activity coaching , 2015, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[127]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  How Do Fugl-Meyer Arm Motor Scores Relate to Dexterity According to the Action Research Arm Test at 6 Months Poststroke? , 2015, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[128]  Elizabeth A. Croft,et al.  A wearable vibrotactile device for upper-limb bilateral motion training in stroke rehabilitation: A case study , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[129]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Abstract MP11: Fitbit: An Accurate and Reliable Device for Wireless Physical Activity Tracking , 2015 .

[130]  P. Veltink,et al.  Ambulatory Estimation of Relative Foot Positions by Fusing Ultrasound and Inertial Sensor Data , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[131]  C. Lang,et al.  Quantifying Real-World Upper-Limb Activity in Nondisabled Adults and Adults With Chronic Stroke , 2015, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[132]  Mark D. Huffman,et al.  AHA Statistical Update Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics — 2012 Update A Report From the American Heart Association WRITING GROUP MEMBERS , 2010 .

[133]  Hermie Hermens,et al.  The development and evaluation of an arm usage coach for Stroke survivors , 2015, 2015 9th International Conference on Sensing Technology (ICST).

[134]  K. Shimizu,et al.  Development and evaluation of a new telerehabilitation system based on VR technology using multisensory feedback for patients with stroke , 2015, Journal of physical therapy science.

[135]  J. Eng,et al.  Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association , 2016, Stroke.

[136]  Rita Paradiso,et al.  Wearable Textile Platform for Assessing Stroke Patient Treatment in Daily Life Conditions , 2016, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol..

[137]  Hermie Hermens,et al.  Usability in telemedicine systems - A literature survey , 2016, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[138]  P. Veltink,et al.  Objective Evaluation of the Quality of Movement in Daily Life after Stroke , 2016, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol..

[139]  Tom H. F. Broens,et al.  The Conceptual MADE Framework for Pervasive and Knowledge-Based Decision Support in Telemedicine , 2016, Int. J. Knowl. Syst. Sci..

[140]  Eleni Stroulia,et al.  International Journal of Medical Informatics , 2016 .