Probabilistic analysis of strip footings resting on a spatially random soil using subset simulation approach

The failure probability of geotechnical structures with spatially varying soil properties is generally computed using Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) methodology. This approach is well known to be very time-consuming when dealing with small failure probabilities. One alternative to MCS is the subset simulation approach. This approach was mainly used in the literature in cases where the uncertain parameters are modelled by random variables. In this article, it is employed in the case where the uncertain parameters are modelled by random fields. This is illustrated through the probabilistic analysis at the serviceability limit state (SLS) of a strip footing resting on a soil with a spatially varying Young's modulus. The probabilistic numerical results have shown that the probability of exceeding a tolerable vertical displacement (P e) calculated by subset simulation is very close to that computed by MCS methodology but with a significant reduction in the number of realisations. A parametric study to investigate the effect of the soil variability (coefficient of variation and the horizontal and vertical autocorrelation lengths of the Young's modulus) on P e was presented and discussed. Finally, a reliability-based design of strip footings was presented. It allows one to obtain the probabilistic footing breadth for a given soil variability.

[1]  George Deodatis,et al.  Effects of random heterogeneity of soil properties on bearing capacity , 2005 .

[2]  Gordon A. Fenton,et al.  Reliability analysis of a strip footing designed against settlement , 2003 .

[3]  G. L. Sivakumar Babu,et al.  Reliability analysis of the bearing capacity of a shallow foundation resting on cohesive soil , 2006 .

[4]  Sung-Eun Cho,et al.  Effect of spatial variability of cross‐correlated soil properties on bearing capacity of strip footing , 2010 .

[5]  R. Ghanem,et al.  Stochastic Finite Element Expansion for Random Media , 1989 .

[6]  Gordon A. Fenton,et al.  Bearing-capacity prediction of spatially random c ϕ soils , 2003 .

[7]  Gordon A. Fenton,et al.  Undrained Bearing Capacity of Two-Strip Footings on Spatially Random Soil , 2006 .

[8]  Yu Wang,et al.  Implementing advanced Monte Carlo simulation under spreadsheet environment , 2010 .

[9]  K. Phoon,et al.  Modified Metropolis–Hastings algorithm with reduced chain correlation for efficient subset simulation , 2011 .

[10]  A. Soubra,et al.  Bearing capacity of foundations resting on a spatially random soil , 2008 .

[11]  Sung-Eun Cho Probabilistic Assessment of Slope Stability That Considers the Spatial Variability of Soil Properties , 2010 .

[12]  D. V. Griffiths,et al.  Three-Dimensional Probabilistic Foundation Settlement , 2005 .

[13]  J. Beck,et al.  Estimation of Small Failure Probabilities in High Dimensions by Subset Simulation , 2001 .

[14]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  Stochastic finite element methods in geotechnical engineering , 2008 .

[15]  James L. Beck,et al.  SUBSET SIMULATION AND ITS APPLICATION TO SEISMIC RISK BASED ON DYNAMIC ANALYSIS , 2003 .

[16]  Gordon A. Fenton,et al.  Probabilistic Foundation Settlement on Spatially Random Soil , 2002 .

[17]  Donald E. Myers,et al.  Reliability and Statistics in Geotechnical Engineering , 2005, Technometrics.