Dissociating recollection from familiarity: Electrophysiological evidence that familiarity for faces is associated with a posterior old/new effect

In recognition memory research, a tension exists between dual-process and single-process models of episodic retrieval. Dual-process models propose that 'familiarity' assessment and the 'recollection' of contextual information are independent processes, while single-process models claim that one common process supports retrieval. Event-related potentials (ERPs) have been used to show dissociations between the mid frontal and the left parietal ERP old/new effects, which have been associated with familiarity and recollection, respectively. While much ERP evidence favours dual-process theory, Yovel and Paller [Yovel, G., Paller, K.A., 2004. The neural basis of the butcher-on-the-bus phenomenon: when a face seems familiar but is not remembered. NeuroImage 21, 789-800] used faces as retrieval cues to demonstrate that posterior old/new effects index both familiarity and recollection, a finding consistent with single-process models. Here we present evidence supporting Yovel and Paller's claim that a posterior old/new effect indexes familiarity for faces, along with a novel finding that recollection is associated with an anterior old/new effect. Importantly, and in contrast to Yovel and Paller, the old/new effects associated with familiarity and recollection were topographically dissociable, consistent with a dual-process view of recognition memory. The neural correlates of familiarity and recollection identified here for faces appear to be different from those typically observed, suggesting that the ERP old/new effects associated with episodic recognition are not the same under all circumstances.

[1]  H. Jasper,et al.  The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[2]  D Y von Cramon,et al.  Event-related potential evidence for a specific recognition memory deficit in adult survivors of cerebral hypoxia. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  A. Yonelinas The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research , 2002 .

[4]  Axel Mecklinger,et al.  Perceptual fluency, semantic familiarity and recognition-related familiarity: an electrophysiological exploration. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[5]  David I. Donaldson,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for the influence of unitization on the processes engaged during episodic retrieval: Enhancing familiarity based remembering , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  T. Curran Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[7]  A. Yonelinas Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  G. Mandler Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. , 1980 .

[9]  A. Mecklinger,et al.  Interfacing mind and brain: a neurocognitive model of recognition memory. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[10]  E. Tulving How many memory systems are there , 1985 .

[11]  Bernard Tiddeman,et al.  Prototyping and Transforming Facial Textures for Perception Research , 2001, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[12]  Astrid M. Schloerscheidt,et al.  The impact of change in stimulus format on the electrophysiological indices of recognition , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  M. Rugg,et al.  Context Effects on the Neural Correlates of Recognition Memory An Electrophysiological Study , 2001, Neuron.

[14]  Marcia Grabowecky,et al.  Electrophysiological Correlates of Recollecting Faces of Known and Unknown Individuals , 2000, NeuroImage.

[15]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Search and decision processes in recognition memory. , 1974 .

[16]  W. Donaldson,et al.  The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[17]  K. Allan,et al.  Fractionating episodic memory retrieval using event-related potentials , 2002 .

[18]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and the recollection of low and high frequency words , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  Ken A Paller,et al.  The neural basis of the butcher-on-the-bus phenomenon: when a face seems familiar but is not remembered , 2004, NeuroImage.

[20]  Mark C. W. van Rossum,et al.  Investigating the functional interaction between semantic and episodic memory: Convergent behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for the role of familiarity , 2007, NeuroImage.

[21]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory , 1998, Nature.

[22]  M. Rugg,et al.  An event-related potential study of recognition memory with and without retrieval of source. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  T. Bussey,et al.  The cognitive neuroscience of memory : encoding and retrieval , 2002 .

[24]  E L Wilding,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for dissociable processes contributing to recollection. , 1998, Acta psychologica.

[25]  M. Rugg,et al.  Recognition memory for new associations: electrophysiological evidence for the role of recollection , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  T. Curran,et al.  Using ERPs to dissociate recollection from familiarity in picture recognition. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[27]  David H. Krantz,et al.  Learning, memory, and thinking , 1974 .

[28]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.