Direct Bio-printing with Heterogeneous Topology Design

Bio-additive manufacturing is a promising tool to fabricate porous scaffold structures for expediting the tissue regeneration processes. Unlike the most traditional bulk material objects, the microstructures of tissue and organs are mostly highly anisotropic, heterogeneous, and porous in nature. However, modelling the internal heterogeneity of tissues/organs structures in the traditional CAD environment is difficult and oftentimes inaccurate. Besides, the de facto STL conversion of bio-models introduces loss of information and piles up more errors in each subsequent step (build orientation, slicing, tool-path planning) of the bio-printing process plan. We are proposing a topology based scaffold design methodology to accurately represent the heterogeneous internal architecture of tissues/organs. An image analysis technique is used that digitizes the topology information contained in medical images of tissues/organs. A weighted topology reconstruction algorithm is implemented to represent the heterogeneity with parametric functions. The parametric functions are then used to map the spatial material distribution. The generated information is directly transferred to the 3D bio-printer and heterogeneous porous tissue scaffold structure is manufactured without STL file. The proposed methodology is implemented to verify the effectiveness of the approach and the designed example structure is bio-fabricated with a deposition based bio-additive manufacturing system.

[1]  Ibrahim T. Ozbolat,et al.  A functionally gradient variational porosity architecture for hollowed scaffolds fabrication , 2011, Biofabrication.

[2]  Dong-Jin Yoo,et al.  Computer-aided porous scaffold design for tissue engineering using triply periodic minimal surfaces , 2011 .

[3]  Ibrahim T. Ozbolat,et al.  Engineered tissue scaffolds with variational porous architecture. , 2011, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[4]  Keita Ito,et al.  Inter-individual variability of bone density and morphology distribution in the proximal femur and T12 vertebra. , 2014, Bone.

[5]  J. Ciurana,et al.  Biomedical production of implants by additive electro-chemical and physical processes , 2012 .

[6]  Sharmila Majumdar,et al.  High-resolution imaging techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis. , 2010, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[7]  Dong-Jin Yoo,et al.  New paradigms in cellular material design and fabrication , 2015 .

[8]  J. Grotowski,et al.  Prototypes for Bone Implant Scaffolds Designed via Topology Optimization and Manufactured by Solid Freeform Fabrication , 2010 .

[9]  F. Taddei,et al.  A novel approach to estimate trabecular bone anisotropy using a database approach. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Bashir Khoda,et al.  Attribute driven process architecture for additive manufacturing , 2017 .

[11]  Wei Xu,et al.  Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants: A review. , 2016, Biomaterials.

[12]  Robert Langer,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Microfluidic Tissue‐Engineering Scaffolds Using a Flexible Biodegradable Polymer , 2006, Advanced materials.

[13]  Keita Ito,et al.  A new approach to determine the accuracy of morphology-elasticity relationships in continuum FE analyses of human proximal femur. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  Bahattin Koc,et al.  Designing Controllable Porosity for Multifunctional Deformable Tissue Scaffolds , 2012 .

[15]  Rui L Reis,et al.  Three-dimensional plotted scaffolds with controlled pore size gradients: Effect of scaffold geometry on mechanical performance and cell seeding efficiency. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[16]  Ibrahim T. Ozbolat,et al.  Designing heterogeneous porous tissue scaffolds for additive manufacturing processes , 2013, Comput. Aided Des..

[17]  S. Hollister,et al.  Optimization of scaffold design for bone tissue engineering: A computational and experimental study. , 2014, Medical engineering & physics.

[18]  Jason A. Burdick,et al.  Patterning hydrogels in three dimensions towards controlling cellular interactions , 2011 .

[19]  S M Giannitelli,et al.  Current trends in the design of scaffolds for computer-aided tissue engineering. , 2014, Acta biomaterialia.

[20]  F. Taddei,et al.  Locally measured microstructural parameters are better associated with vertebral strength than whole bone density , 2014, Osteoporosis International.