Tailored Scenarios: A Low-Cost Online Method to Elicit Perceptions of Home Technologies Using Participant-Specific Contextual Information

The introduction of new ubiquitous computing technologies has the capacity to greatly affect the home, a space that is core to human experience, yet remains understudied owing to its sensitive, semi-private nature. Scenario-based methods have previously been used to collect home technology design responses but they have tended to over-simplify the social contexts involved, and have not taken into account the unique circumstances of the respondents. Technology probes have also been used but suffer from increased costs in research time and effort and a corresponding reduction in participation, as well as decreased acceptance owing to their invasiveness. We present 'Tailored Scenarios', a new method for eliciting participant responses involving home-based technologies that dynamically presents participants with scenarios, based on their home contexts, into which new technologies are installed. 'Tailored Scenarios' use self-reported contextual data to customize each scenario. We present the method, and report findings from a case study in which we compared responses to 'Tailored Scenarios' with those from traditional scenarios and technology probes. Our findings suggest that 'Tailored Scenarios' is an improvement over standard scenario methods in terms of eliciting attitudes towards technology and are easier to implement at scale than technology probes.

[1]  Chris Chapman,et al.  The Personas' New Clothes: Methodological and Practical Arguments against a Popular Method , 2006 .

[2]  Dimitra Dodou,et al.  Five-Point Likert Items: t test versus Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon , 2010 .

[3]  Lene Nielsen,et al.  From user to character: an investigation into user-descriptions in scenarios , 2002, DIS '02.

[4]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Rapidly Exploring Application Design Through Speed Dating , 2007, UbiComp.

[5]  M. Bloor,et al.  Putting it in context: the use of vignettes in qualitative interviewing , 2010 .

[6]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Best intentions: health monitoring technology and children , 2012, CHI.

[7]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Contravision: exploring users' reactions to futuristic technology , 2010, CHI.

[8]  Glyn Lawson,et al.  Exploring Interpretations of Data from the Internet of Things in the Home , 2013, Interacting with computers.

[9]  R. Hughes Considering the Vignette Technique and its Application to a Study of Drug Injecting and HIV Risk and Safer Behaviour , 1998 .

[10]  Sari Kujala,et al.  Collecting cross-cultural user data with internationalized storyboard survey , 2011, OZCHI.

[11]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Storyboarding: an empirical determination of best practices and effective guidelines , 2006, DIS '06.

[12]  Eli Blevis,et al.  Energy aware dwelling: a critical survey of interaction design for eco-visualizations , 2008, OZCHI.

[13]  Nicolas Hine,et al.  Current Issues and Future Directions in Methods for Studying Technology in the Home , 2013, PsychNology J..

[14]  D. Snelders,et al.  Narrative Transportation in Concept Tests for Really New Products: The Moderating Effect of Reader–Protagonist Similarity† , 2012 .

[15]  Z. Šidák Rectangular Confidence Regions for the Means of Multivariate Normal Distributions , 1967 .

[16]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Feminism and interaction design , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[17]  Allison Druin,et al.  Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families , 2003, CHI '03.

[18]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Domestic Routines and Design for the Home , 2004, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[19]  J. Davies,et al.  An alternative method for predicting attrition from an alcohol treatment programme. , 2003, Alcohol and alcoholism.

[20]  Glyn Lawson,et al.  Tailored scenarios: a low-cost online method to elicit perceptions on designs using real relationships , 2013, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[21]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Making use: scenarios and scenario-based design , 2000, DIS '00.

[22]  Jessica L. Collett,et al.  Minding the gap: Meaning, affect, and the potential shortcomings of vignettes , 2011 .

[23]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Making Use: Scenario-Based Design of Human-Computer Interactions , 2000 .