Quantitative mapping of a precursory seismic quiescence to the Izu–Oshima 1990 (M6.5) earthquake, Japan

A highly significant seismic quiescence with a standard deviate Z = 10.1. corresponding to a 99 per cent confidence level, lasted from 1987.7 up to the 1990 February 20 Izu-Oshima M 6.5 earthquake. The quiescent volume had dimensions of 30 km N-S and 10 km E-W and was centred below 14 km depth. Within the recently upgraded seismograph network of the Earthquake Research Institute (ERI), this main shock was the only one with a magnitude M > 5.8 in the upper 30 km of the crust for which the precursory quiescence hypothesis could be tested. Within a radius of 50 km, and during the observation period (1983.5–1995.9), there were no other 1.5 yr or longer periods of quiescence that were rated Z > 6.5 in the declustered earthquake catalogue, except one that was associated with volcanic activity. The total space-time covered by alarms, including the volcanic one, was less than 1 per cent at the Z = 6.5 level. The rarity of highly significant episodes of quiescence, and the correlation in space and time suggest that a precursory seismic quiescence started 2.5 yr before the Izu-Oshima 1990 earthquake in its source volume and to the north of it, and that it can be recognized with an alarm level of Z = 6.0, generating no false alarms. During the 1.5 yr quiescence window, only 10 earthquakes occurred in the quiet volume, whereas 50 events were expected based on the rate seen at other times. In randomly selected volumes containing 50, 100 and 200 events, the anomaly scored Z = 6.1 to 10.1. On the basis of the data from May 1983 to 1995, there is no highly significant quiescence currently present in the Izu-Oshima area.

[1]  Artificial and natural changes in the rates of seismic activity: a case study of the Garm Region, Tadjikistan (CIS) , 1994 .

[2]  David A. Rhoades,et al.  The precursory earthquake swarm in New Zealand: Hypothesis tests , 1993 .

[3]  C. Nicholson,et al.  Intermediate-term, pre-earthquake phenomena in California, 1975–1986, and preliminary forecast of seismicity for the next decade , 1988 .

[4]  R. E. Habermann,et al.  Case 23 nomination of precursory seismic quiescence as a significant precursor , 1997 .

[5]  R. E. Habermann.  Teleseismic detection in the Aleutian Island Arc , 1983 .

[6]  Precursory seismic quiescence in the Mudurnu Valley, North Anatolian fault zone, Turkey , 1995 .

[7]  R. Console,et al.  Seismicity rate change before the Irpinia (M = 6.9) 1980 earthquake , 1997, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[8]  R. E. Habermann,et al.  Precursory quiescence before the August 1982 Stone Canyon, San Andreas fault, earthquakes , 1988 .

[9]  R. E. Habermann.  Consistency of teleseismic reporting since 1963 , 1982 .

[10]  C. Kisslinger.  An experiment in earthquake prediction and the 7 May 1986 Andreanof Islands earthquake , 1988 .

[11]  R. E. Habermann,et al.  Seismicity rate variations and systematic changes in magnitudes in teleseismic catalogs , 1991 .

[12]  P. Reasenberg,et al.  Comment on Habermann's method for detecting seismicity rate changes , 1987 .

[13]  R. E. Habermann,et al.  Precursory seismic quiescence , 1988 .

[14]  M. Wyss,et al.  Occurrence of a predicted earthquake on the San Andreas fault , 1987, Nature.

[15]  B. Kindel,et al.  A comparison of seismicity rates near Adak Island, Alaska, September 1988 through May 1990 with rates before the 1982 to 1986 apparent quiescence , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[16]  Reporting history of the Central Aleutians Seismograph Network and the quiescence preceding the 1986 Andreanof Island earthquake , 1991, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[17]  Stefan Wiemer,et al.  Seismic quiescence before the landers (M = 7.5) and big bear (M = 6.5) 1992 earthquakes , 1994 .

[18]  Yosihiko Ogata,et al.  Detection of precursory relative quiescence before great earthquakes through a statistical model , 1992 .

[19]  R. E. Habermann.  Man-made changes of seismicity rates , 1987 .

[20]  W. D. Stuart.  Strain softening prior to two‐dimensional strike slip earthquakes , 1979 .

[21]  R. E. Habermann.  A test of two techniques for recognizing systematic errors in magnitude estimates using data from parkfield, California , 1986 .

[22]  R. E. Habermann,et al.  Seismic quiescence at Parkfield: an independent indication of an imminent earthquake , 1990, Nature.

[23]  C H Scholz,et al.  Earthquake prediction: a physical basis. , 1973, Science.

[24]  Stuart P. Nishenko,et al.  Seismicity trends and potential for large earthquakes in the Alaska-Aleutian region , 1994 .

[25]  R. E. Habermann.  Precursory seismic quiescence: Past, present, and future , 1988 .

[26]  J. A. Snoke,et al.  Seismic quiescence before the Urakawa-Oki earthquake , 1991 .

[27]  P. Reasenberg,et al.  Statistical methods for investigating quiescence and other temporal seismicity patterns , 1988 .

[28]  David J. Varnes,et al.  Predicting earthquakes by analyzing accelerating precursory seismic activity , 1989 .

[29]  M. Wyss.  Seismic quiescence precursor to the 1983 Kaoiki (MS = 6.6), Hawaii, earthquake , 1986 .

[30]  Tim Ahern.  The IRIS Data Management Center , 1996 .

[31]  Lynn R. Sykes,et al.  Seismic activity on neighbouring faults as a long-term precursor to large earthquakes in the San Francisco Bay area , 1990, Nature.

[32]  P. Reasenberg.  Second‐order moment of central California seismicity, 1969–1982 , 1985 .