The impact of learning, forgetting and capacity profiles on the acquisition of advanced technology

Many technology researchers and managers have stressed the importance of developing long-term, corporate technology strategies for acquiring advanced technological capabilities (in R&D, engineering, production, etc.) necessary to gain competitive advantage. In addition technology managers are under increasing pressure to produce better results more productively. A resulting trend is greater use of external relationships and resources to achieve the needed technological accomplishments with greater efficiency. There are innumerable alternatives for combining internal and external corporate resources (primarily personnel and equipment) to obtain the needed advanced technologies. Also the decision on how to acquire advanced soft technologies, typically labor intensive, may depend on the learning and forgetting inherent in the personnel using the technologies, the amount of technology capacity needed per period, and the resulting cost implications. We report on a research effort designed to aid technology researchers and managers make more accurate advanced technology sourcing and usage decisions. We present a mixed integer, nonlinear programming model, which can determine the lowest cost strategy for obtaining the needed long-term, advanced technology capability, while considering nonlinear performance improvement (learning), and forgetting characteristics for personnel and equipment performance decay. Comprehensive and realistically-based example problems are provided and the resulting insights discussed. Numerous future research extensions are offered.

[1]  A. Washburn.  The Effects of Discounting Profits in the Presence of Learning in the Optimization of Production Rates , 1972 .

[2]  B. Ronen,et al.  The Declining Price Paradox of New Technologies , 1987 .

[3]  Jeffrey D. Camm,et al.  Modeling Synergy and Learning under Multiple Advanced Manufacturing Technologies , 1989 .

[4]  Ashoka Mody.  Firm strategies for costly engineering learning , 1989 .

[5]  Deb Chatterji,et al.  Accessing External Sources of Technology , 1996 .

[6]  Robert William Haigh,et al.  The growth of integrated oil companies , 1955 .

[7]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Solving Production Smoothing Problems , 1969 .

[8]  R. Ebert.  Aggregate Planning with Learning Curve Productivity , 1976 .

[9]  Chwen Sheu,et al.  A mixed integer programming model for acquiring advanced engineering technologies , 1993 .

[10]  Joyce T. Chen.  MODELING LEARNING CURVE AND LEARNING COMPLEMENTARITY FOR RESOURCE ALLOCATION AND PRODUCTION SCHEDULING , 1983 .

[11]  Dileep R. Sule.  The Effect of Alternate Periods of Learning and Forgetting on Economic Manufacturing Quantity , 1978 .

[12]  Phil McKenzie,et al.  Shift Scheduling in Banking Operations: A Case Application , 1980 .

[13]  S. Eilon,et al.  The production smoothing problem , 1972 .

[14]  S. G. Davis,et al.  Joint Determination of Machine Requirements and Shift Scheduling in Banking Operations , 1981 .

[15]  Avraham Shtub,et al.  The Impact of Breaks on Forgetting When Performing A Repetitive Task , 1989 .

[16]  Joseph G. Morone,et al.  The virtual R&D laboratory , 1996 .

[17]  Shlomo Globerson,et al.  Incorporating Forgetting into Learning Curves , 1987 .

[18]  Louis E. Yelle.  THE LEARNING CURVE: HISTORICAL REVIEW AND COMPREHENSIVE SURVEY , 1979 .

[19]  Philip Sporn,et al.  Economic Redevelopment in Bituminous Coal , 1963 .

[20]  Vincent A. Mabert,et al.  A Case Study of Encoder Shift Scheduling under Uncertainty , 1979 .

[21]  C. Bailey.  Forgetting and the learning curve: a laboratory study , 1989 .

[22]  Roger J. Gagnon,et al.  Strategies and performance improvement for computer-assisted design , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[23]  William Howland Taubert,et al.  The search decision rule approach to operations planning , 1968 .

[24]  B. P. Lingaraj.  A MODEL FOR OPTIMIZING FACILITY DESIGN , 1976 .

[25]  Woody M. Liao.  EFFECTS OF LEARNING ON RESOURCE ALLOCATION DECISIONS , 1979 .