Identifying traffic safety best practice: an application of DEA and Malmquist indices

DEA is used in this paper to investigate target achievements of the operational units of the Norwegian Public Roads Administration (NPRA) charged with traffic safety services. The DEA framework applied corresponds to a BCC model with a unique constant input, or equivalently, with no inputs. This framework is further extended to a DEA-based Malmquist index to measure productivity growth in target achievements. Finally, we use a bootstrapping method to ascertain confidence intervals for efficiency scores derived and to test hypotheses on the extent of productivity growth or regress. The mean efficiency scores by which targets are achieved across the sample years are in the range 0.81-0.93 and significant at the 5% level. Total productivity in target achievements shows progress with significance, on average at 7%. Much of the progress is attributed to technological progress. The results illustrate the usefulness of using a decomposable index for productivity measurement, and the use of bootstrapping for sensitivity tests.

[1]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap. , 1994 .

[2]  David Hawdon,et al.  Efficiency, performance and regulation of the international gas industry—a bootstrap DEA approach , 2003 .

[3]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Efficiency Scores: How to Bootstrap in Nonparametric Frontier Models , 1998 .

[4]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Statistical Inference in Nonparametric Frontier Models: The State of the Art , 1999 .

[5]  Gary D. Ferrier,et al.  Bootstrapping Confidence Intervals for Linear Programming Efficiency Scores: With an Illustration Using Italian Banking Data , 1997 .

[6]  SimarLeopold,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Efficiency Scores , 1998 .

[7]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  THE ECONOMIC THEORY OF INDEX NUMBERS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF INPUT, OUTPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY , 1982 .

[8]  A. Charnes,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis Theory, Methodology and Applications , 1995 .

[9]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity Developments in Swedish Hospitals: A Malmquist Output Index Approach , 1994 .

[10]  James Odeck,et al.  Assessing the relative efficiency and productivity growth of vehicle inspection services: An application of DEA and Malmquist indices , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Shawna Grosskopf,et al.  Some Remarks on Productivity and its Decompositions , 2003 .

[12]  M. Lothgren.  Bootstrapping the Malmquist Productivity Index: A Simulation Study , 1999 .

[13]  Finn R. Førsund,et al.  Technical efficiency of Norwegian banks: The non-parametric approach to efficiency measurement , 1991 .

[14]  Jesús T. Pastor,et al.  Radial DEA models without inputs or without outputs , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  C. Lovell,et al.  The Decomposition of Malmquist Productivity Indexes , 2003 .

[16]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[17]  B. Efron.  Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife , 1979 .

[18]  J. Pastor,et al.  Target setting: An application to a bank branch network , 1997 .

[19]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Comparing mean efficiency and productivity scores from small samples: A bootstrap methodology , 1995 .

[20]  S. Malmquist.  Index numbers and indifference surfaces , 1953 .

[21]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[22]  Lennart Hjalmarsson,et al.  Productivity in multiple output public service: A quadratic frontier function and Malmquist index approach , 1995 .

[23]  C. Lovell,et al.  A note on the Malmquist productivity index , 1995 .

[24]  Léopold Simar,et al.  Estimating and bootstrapping Malmquist indices , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Rikard Althin,et al.  Measurement of Productivity Changes: Two Malmquist Index Approaches , 2001 .

[26]  R. Färe,et al.  The measurement of efficiency of production , 1985 .