Smooth Operator: Avoidance of Subharmonic Bifurcations through Mechanical Mechanisms Simplifies Song Motor Control in Adult Zebra Finches

Like human infants, songbirds acquire their song by imitation and eventually generate sounds that result from complicated neural networks and intrinsically nonlinear physical processes. Signatures of low-dimensional chaos such as subharmonic bifurcations have been reported in adult and developing zebra finch song. Here, we use methods from nonlinear dynamics to test whether adult male zebra finches (Taenopygia guttata) use the intrinsic nonlinear properties of their vocal organ, the syrinx, to insert subharmonic transitions in their song. In contrast to previous data on the basis of spectrographic evidence, we show that subharmonic transitions do not occur in adult song. Subharmonic transitions also do not arise in artificially induced sound in the intact syrinx, but are commonly generated in the excised syrinx. These findings suggest that subharmonic transitions are not used to increase song complexity, and that the brain controls song in a surprisingly smooth control regimen. Fast, smooth changes in acoustic elements can be produced by direct motor control in a stereotyped fashion, which is a more reliable indicator of male fitness than abrupt acoustic changes that do not require similarly precise control. Consistent with this view is the presence of high fidelity at every level of motor control, from telencephalic premotor areas to superfast syringeal muscles.

[1]  W Seidner,et al.  Nonlinear phenomena in the natural howling of a dog-wolf mix. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Ingo Titze,et al.  Nonlinear dynamics of the voice: Signal analysis and biomechanical modeling. , 1995, Chaos.

[3]  Christopher M. Glaze,et al.  Behavioral Measurements of a Temporally Precise Motor Code for Birdsong , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  F. Goller,et al.  A new mechanism of sound generation in songbirds. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  L. Rome,et al.  Superfast muscles control sound production in songbirds , 2008 .

[6]  S. Zollinger,et al.  Producing Song: The Vocal Apparatus , 2004, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[7]  S. Nowicki,et al.  Vocal tract resonances in oscine bird sound production: evidence from birdsongs in a helium atmosphere , 1987, Nature.

[8]  Gabriel B Mindlin,et al.  Modeling source-source and source-filter acoustic interaction in birdsong. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  H. Herzel,et al.  SUBHARMONICS, BIPHONATION, AND DETERMINISTIC CHAOS IN MAMMAL VOCALIZATION , 1998 .

[10]  Michale S Fee,et al.  A basal ganglia-forebrain circuit in the songbird biases motor output to avoid vocal errors , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  S. Sober,et al.  Adult birdsong is actively maintained by error correction , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  Isao Tokuda,et al.  Nonlinear analysis of irregular animal vocalizations. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  F. Nottebohm,et al.  Dynamics of the Vocal Imitation Process: How a Zebra Finch Learns Its Song , 2001, Science.

[14]  Jack J Jiang,et al.  Nonlinear dynamics of phonations in excised larynx experiments. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  A. Feng,et al.  Voices of the dead: Complex nonlinear vocal signals from the larynx of an ultrasonic frog , 2006 .

[16]  D. Nowacek,et al.  NONLINEAR DYNAMICS IN MANATEE VOCALIZATIONS , 2006 .

[17]  D. Margoliash,et al.  Motor control of birdsong , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[18]  Randall D. Beer,et al.  The brain has a body: adaptive behavior emerges from interactions of nervous system, body and environment , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.

[19]  N. Fletcher,et al.  Songbirds tune their vocal tract to the fundamental frequency of their song. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Solari,et al.  Relative rotation rates for driven dynamical systems. , 1988, Physical review. A, General physics.

[21]  M. C. Baker,et al.  Population Differentiation in a Complex Bird Sound: A Comparison of Three Bioacoustical Analysis Procedures , 2003 .

[22]  Steven H. Strogatz,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos , 2024 .

[23]  R. R. Capranica,et al.  Bilateral syringeal interaction in vocal production of an oscine bird sound. , 1986, Science.

[24]  J. Švec,et al.  Bifurcations and chaos in register transitions of excised larynx experiments. , 2008, Chaos.

[25]  S. Zollinger,et al.  Two-voice complexity from a single side of the syrinx in northern mockingbird Mimus polyglottos vocalizations , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[26]  R. Gilmore Topological analysis of chaotic dynamical systems , 1998 .

[27]  Zhiyi Chi,et al.  Temporal Precision and Temporal Drift in Brain and Behavior of Zebra Finch Song , 2001, Neuron.

[28]  Franz Goller,et al.  Peripheral Motor Dynamics of Song Production in the Zebra Finch , 2004, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[29]  van Rr René Hassel,et al.  Theoretical and experimental study of quasisteady‐flow separation within the glottis during phonation. Application to a modified two‐mass model , 1994 .

[30]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.

[31]  Bijan Pesaran,et al.  The role of nonlinear dynamics of the syrinx in the vocalizations of a songbird , 1998, Nature.

[32]  Gabriel J. L. Beckers S26-4 Nonlinear phenomena and song evolution in Streptopelia doves , 2006 .

[33]  C. Elemans,et al.  Syddansk Universitet Spectrogram analysis of mechanical events in sound production of animals , 2009 .

[34]  R. Suthers Contributions to birdsong from the left and right sides of the intact syrinx , 1990, Nature.

[35]  K. D. Punta,et al.  An ultra-sparse code underlies the generation of neural sequences in a songbird , 2002 .

[36]  M. Brainard,et al.  Performance variability enables adaptive plasticity of ‘crystallized’ adult birdsong , 2007, Nature.

[37]  L. Rome,et al.  Superfast Vocal Muscles Control Song Production in Songbirds , 2008, PloS one.

[38]  R. Laje,et al.  Continuous model for vocal fold oscillations to study the effect of feedback. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[39]  W. Fitch,et al.  Voice instabilities due to source-tract interactions , 2006 .

[40]  Rnj Raymond Veldhuis,et al.  A symmetrical two-mass vocal-fold model coupled to vocal tract and trachea, with application to prosthesis design , 1998 .

[41]  S. Derégnaucourt,et al.  Song Development: In Search of the Error‐Signal , 2004, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[42]  M. Konishi The role of auditory feedback in the control of vocalization in the white-crowned sparrow. , 1965, Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie.

[43]  Patrick J O Miller,et al.  Nonlinear phenomena in the vocalizations of North Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena glacialis) and killer whales (Orcinus orca). , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  Hanspeter Herzel,et al.  Calls out of chaos: the adaptive significance of nonlinear phenomena in mammalian vocal production , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[45]  H. K. Schutte,et al.  On pitch jumps between chest and falsetto registers in voice: data from living and excised human larynges. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  K. Heeck,et al.  SPECTROGRAM ANALYSIS OF ANIMAL SOUND PRODUCTION , 2008 .

[47]  H. K. Schutte,et al.  A subharmonic vibratory pattern in normal vocal folds. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[48]  S. Bastianoni,et al.  Characterization of chaotic dynamics in the vocalization of Cervus elaphus corsicanus. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  Vocal tract motor patterns and resonance during constant frequency song: the white-throated sparrow , 2009, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[50]  Hanspeter Herzel,et al.  Biomechanics and control of vocalization in a non-songbird , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[51]  N. Fletcher A class of chaotic bird calls? , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[52]  O. N. Larsen,et al.  Role of syringeal vibrations in bird vocalizations , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[53]  Matjaž Perc,et al.  Singing of Neoconocephalus robustus as an example of deterministic chaos in insects , 2007, Journal of Biosciences.