Fuzzy land element classification from DTMs based on geometry and terrain position

Abstract Land elements have been used as basic landform descriptors in many science disciplines, including soil mapping, vegetation mapping, and landscape ecology. We describe an approach in terrain classification, with the objective of deriving a method for classifying land elements from DTMs based on their fundamental characteristics. The methodology for modelling land elements is implemented as a two-step process: first, form elements are classified based on local geometry, and second, land elements are derived by evaluating the form elements in their landscape context. Form elements are derived by fuzzy classification of slope and curvature at a specified global scale (window size). The form elements are reclassified according to their geomorphometric context using a higher scale terrain position index. The resulting land elements are evaluated with respect to their predictive value for modelling soil properties. It is shown that scaling geomorphometric properties is important for applying them to predict soil properties and to model landform units. The presented model, based on scaled geomorphometric properties and geomorphometric context, using a limited number of model parameters, is capable of modelling fundamental land elements that can be utilized in soil–landscape modelling and in other applications in land resource management.

[1]  P. Burrough,et al.  Fuzzy k-means classification of topo-climatic data as an aid to forest mapping in the Greater Yellowstone Area, USA , 2001, Landscape Ecology.

[2]  P. L. Singleton,et al.  Soil Description Handbook , 1995 .

[3]  Joseph. Wood,et al.  The geomorphological characterisation of Digital Elevation Models , 1996 .

[4]  Peter A. Burrough,et al.  High-resolution landform classification using fuzzy k-means , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[5]  José Darrozes,et al.  The Black Top Hat function applied to a DEM: A tool to estimate recent incision in a mountainous watershed (Estibère Watershed, Central Pyrenees) , 2002 .

[6]  Stephen J. Ventura,et al.  Fuzzy and isodata classification of landform elements from digital terrain data in Pleasant Valley, Wisconsin , 1997 .

[7]  Holger Gärtner,et al.  Principles of semantic modeling of landform structures , 2001 .

[8]  Jochen Schmidt,et al.  Comparison of polynomial models for land surface curvature calculation , 2003, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[9]  P.F.M. van Gaans,et al.  Continuous classification in soil survey: spatial correlation, confusion and boundaries , 1997 .

[10]  R. A. MacMillan,et al.  A generic procedure for automatically segmenting landforms into landform elements using DEMs, heuristic rules and fuzzy logic , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[11]  I. Evans Statistical Characterization of Altitude Matrices by Computer. Report 6. An Integrated System of Terrain Analysis and Slope Mapping. , 1979 .

[12]  P. A. Shary,et al.  Fundamental quantitative methods of land surface analysis , 2002 .

[13]  J. Walker,et al.  Australian Soil and Land Survey Field Handbook , 1984 .

[14]  Peter A. Burrough,et al.  Fuzzy mathematical methods for soil survey and land evaluation , 1989 .

[15]  J. Gallant,et al.  A multiresolution index of valley bottom flatness for mapping depositional areas , 2003 .

[16]  Igor V. Florinsky,et al.  Accuracy of Local Topographic Variables Derived from Digital Elevation Models , 1998, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[17]  John R. Dymond,et al.  Automated mapping of land components from digital elevation data , 1995 .