Seismic safety of structures: Influence of soil-flexibility, asymmetry and ground motion characteristics

Structures may experience degradation in strength in the event of strong seismic shaking. A rational estimation of the reserve strength of the structures is often desired in the process of retrofitting or strengthening the same. To achieve this end, the present paper confirms the suitability of an existing hysteresis model in reproducing experimental load–displacement characteristics for reinforced concrete (R/C) structural members. Attempt has also been made for rational and realistic estimation of the degradation parameter required for the model in absence of any case-specific calibrated value. Subsequently, post-earthquake behaviour of the low-rise symmetric structures is assessed with and without accounting for the effect of soil–structure interaction. Such response for low-rise multistorey systems with regular asymmetry has also been investigated in the sample form. To develop insight into the behaviour of asymmetric (unidirectional and bi-directional) systems, detailed investigation has been made on idealized single-storey asymmetric systems under simulated and real ground motions with different phase difference or time lag variation. This suggests a serious implication of occurrence of peaks of the ground motions on the seismic performance of bi-directionally eccentric structures and indicates a relatively higher torsional vulnerability of bi-directionally eccentric system compared to equivalent uni-directional counterpart. The results along with the endeavour toward measuring the ductility capacity for R/C structural members based on the systematic observation and interpretation of the available experimental results, made in the paper, may prove useful in evaluating the seismic safety of low-rise R/C structures. r 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  Sekhar Chandra Dutta,et al.  Validity and Applicability of Two Simple Hysteresis Models to Assess Progressive Seismic Damage in R/c Asymmetric Buildings , 2002 .

[2]  Ricardo Dobry,et al.  Dynamic Response of Arbitrarily Shaped Foundations , 1986 .

[3]  J. K. Wight,et al.  Exterior Reinforced Concrete Beam-to-Column ConnectionsSubjected to Earthquake-Type Loading , 1985 .

[4]  G. Gazetas.  FORMULAS AND CHARTS FOR IMPEDANCES OF SURFACE AND EMBEDDED FOUNDATIONS , 1991 .

[5]  O. A. Pekau,et al.  Dynamic response of bilinear asymmetric structures , 1985 .

[6]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Inelastic seismic response of one-storey, asymmetric-plan systems : effects of stiffness and strength distribution , 1990 .

[7]  F. Filippou,et al.  Effects of Reinforcement Slip on Hysteretic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Frame Members. , 1999 .

[8]  Angelo D'Ambrisi,et al.  Modeling of Cyclic Shear Behavior in RC Members , 1999 .

[9]  Juan Carlos de la Llera,et al.  Inelastic Behavior of Asymmetric Multistory Buildings , 1996 .

[10]  Cheng-Cheng Chen,et al.  Cyclic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Eccentric Beam-Column Corner Joints Connecting Spread-Ended Beams , 1999 .

[11]  Luis Esteva,et al.  Earthquake engineering research and practice in Mexico after the 1985 earthquakes , 1987 .

[12]  S. C. Dutta,et al.  Response of low-rise buildings under seismic ground excitation incorporating soil-structure interaction , 2004 .

[13]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Beam-Columns under Uniaxial Excitation , 1988 .

[14]  S. Kramer.  Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering , 1996 .

[15]  M. Saatcioglu,et al.  Response of Reinforced Concrete Columns to Simulated Seismic Loading , 1989 .

[16]  E. Rosenblueth.  The 1985 earthquake : Causes and effects in Mexico City , 1986 .

[17]  Y. J. Park,et al.  IDARC: Inelastic Damage Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Frame - Shear-Wall Structures , 1987 .

[18]  T. Paulay,et al.  Reinforced Concrete Structures , 1975 .

[19]  Yi-Lung Mo,et al.  Seismic Behavior of RC Columns with Various Tie Configurations , 2000 .

[20]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Structures Subjected to Uniaxial Excitation , 1991 .

[21]  Roberto Meli,et al.  The 1985 Mexico Earthquake , 1986 .

[22]  Joseph E. Bowles,et al.  Foundation analysis and design , 1968 .

[23]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Dual-Level Approach for Seismic Design of Asymmetric-Plan Buildings , 1994 .

[24]  Richard A. Parmelee,et al.  Seismic response of multiple-story structures on flexible foundations , 1969 .

[25]  John B. Mander,et al.  Seismic Resistance of Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures Designed Only for Gravity Loads: Experimental Performance of Subassemblages , 1994 .

[26]  S. C. Dutta,et al.  Effect of soil-flexibility on dynamic behaviour of building frames on raft foundation , 2004 .

[27]  A. M. Chandler,et al.  Inelastic seismic response of code‐designed multistorey frame buildings with regular asymmetry , 1993 .

[28]  M. J. N. Priestley,et al.  SEISMIC RESISTANCE OF FRAMES WITH VERTICALLY DISTRIBUTED LONGITUDINAL REINFORCEMENT IN BEAMS , 1990 .

[29]  Mohsin R. Khan.  Improved method of generation of artificial time‐histories, rich in all frequencies, from floor spectra , 1987 .

[30]  James K. Wight,et al.  Closure of "Strength Decay of RC Columns under Shear Reversals" , 1976 .

[31]  Rakesh K. Goel.  Seismic Response of Asymmetric Systems: Energy-Based Approach , 1997 .

[32]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  SEISMIC SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION IN BUILDINGS. I: ANALYTICAL METHODS , 1999 .

[33]  R. Dobry,et al.  Effect of Soil Plasticity on Cyclic Response , 1991 .

[34]  M. J. N. Priestley,et al.  SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF CIRCULAR COLUMNS WITH LOW LONGITUDINAL REINFORCEMENT RATIOS , 1996 .

[35]  James O. Jirsa,et al.  REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAMS UNDER LOAD REVERSALS , 1971 .

[36]  Sekhar Chandra Dutta.  Effect of strength deterioration on inelastic seismic torsional behaviour of asymmetric RC buildings , 2001 .

[37]  Kenneth H. Stokoe,et al.  Closure of "Dynamic Response of Arbitrarily Shaped Foundations: Experimental Verification" , 1986 .

[38]  T. Takeda,et al.  Reinforced Concrete response to simulated earthquakes , 1970 .

[39]  Sekhar Chandra Dutta,et al.  Assessing lateral period of building frames incorporating soil-flexibility , 2004 .

[40]  W. K. Tso,et al.  Evaluation of Seismic Torsional Provisions in Uniform Building Code , 1995 .

[41]  R. Sharpe.  Tentative Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulations for Buildings , 1994 .

[42]  Adrian M. Chandler.  Building damage in Mexico City earthquake , 1986, Nature.

[43]  Sekhar Chandra Dutta,et al.  Seismic Behavior of Code-Designed Bidirectionally Eccentric Systems , 2005 .

[44]  S. C Dutta,et al.  Inelastic seismic response of code-designed reinforced concrete asymmetric buildings with strength degradation , 2002 .