Management attitudes and technology adoption in long-term care facilities.

PURPOSE The purpose of this paper is to explore the attitudes of nursing home administrators and key managerial staff toward health information technology (health IT). DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH This research is exploratory in nature, and applies qualitative case-study methodology to further understand health IT adoption by nursing homes through multiple in-depth semi-structured interviews of management, and direct observations of employee behavior at each participating facility. A modified Technology Acceptance Model is used to examine the attitudes and perceptions of administrators. FINDINGS This study finds that there are differences in the level of health IT adoption by nursing homes. While some administrators are aware of health IT and are implementing or updating their IT systems in a gradual but haphazard manner, others exhibited a lack of interest in implementing change. Overall, there is a lack of systematic planning and decision-making toward health IT adoption. Adoption is not evidence-based, instead driven primarily by real and perceived regulatory requirements combined with a lack of information about, or consideration of, the real costs and benefits of implementing health IT. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS Including six in-depth case studies, the sample for this study is small for generalizing the findings. Yet, it contributes to the literature on the slow process of health IT adoption by nursing homes. Moreover, the findings provide guidelines for future research. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS This study demonstrates that nursing home administrators must systematically plan the adoption of health IT, and such decision making should be evidenced-based and participatory so that employees can voice their opinions that could prevent future resistance. ORIGINALITY/VALUE This study is original and advances knowledge on the reasons for the slow adoption of health IT in nursing homes. It finds that lack of adequate information regarding the utility and benefits of health IT in management adoption decisions can result in haphazard implementation or no adoption at all. This finding has significant value for policy makers' practitioners for improving accessibility of information regarding the use of health IT in nursing homes that could address the health IT adoption challenge in this industry.

[1]  D. Bates,et al.  Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. , 1998, JAMA.

[2]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[3]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[4]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[5]  Rainu Kaushal,et al.  Bmc Medical Informatics and Decision Making Assessing the Level of Healthcare Information Technology Adoption in the United States: a Snapshot , 2005 .

[6]  Anne F. Kittler,et al.  A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. , 2003, The American journal of medicine.

[7]  Sue Abdinnour-Helm,et al.  Pre-implementation attitudes and organizational readiness for implementing an Enterprise Resource Planning system , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease of Use in IS Adoption: A Study of E-Commerce Adoption , 2000, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[9]  David W Bates,et al.  Research Paper: Prescribers' Responses to Alerts During Medication Ordering in the Long Term Care Setting , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[10]  E. Chrischilles,et al.  Electronic prescribing and monitoring are needed to improve drug use. , 2000, Archives of internal medicine.

[11]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  Global-local negotiations for implementing configurable packages: The power of initial organizational decisions , 2005, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Linda Gavendo,et al.  Computerized Physician Order Entry with Clinical Decision Support in the Long‐Term Care Setting: Insights from the Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[13]  D. Bates,et al.  Improving safety with information technology. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  Paula Garrett,et al.  Improving patient safety through information technology. , 2005, Perspectives in health information management.

[15]  A. Localio,et al.  Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. , 2005 .

[16]  M. Gagnon,et al.  Comparison of user groups' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review , 2011, BMC medicine.

[17]  Mike Chiasson,et al.  Pushing the contextual envelope: developing and diffusing IS theory for health information systems research , 2004, Inf. Organ..

[18]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[19]  Bradley N. Doebbeling,et al.  Research Paper: VA QUERI Informatics Paper Information Technology for Clinical Guideline Implementation: Perceptions of Multidisciplinary Stakeholders , 2004, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[20]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[21]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[22]  J. Kalus.  Health information technology--results from a roundtable discussion. , 2009 .

[23]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology , 2012, MIS Q..

[24]  C. Kruse,et al.  Adoption factors associated with electronic health record among long-term care facilities: a systematic review , 2015, BMJ Open.

[25]  Ariel C. Avgar,et al.  Organizational Strategies for the Adoption of Electronic Medical Records: Toward an Understanding of Outcome Variation in Nursing Homes , 2009 .

[26]  David W. Bates,et al.  Bmc Medical Informatics and Decision Making the Quality Case for Information Technology in Healthcare , 2002 .

[27]  B Starfield,et al.  Is US health really the best in the world? , 2000, JAMA.

[28]  Joseph A. Maxwell,et al.  Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach , 1996 .

[29]  Robyn Tamblyn,et al.  Review Paper: The Impact of Electronic Health Records on Time Efficiency of Physicians and Nurses: A Systematic Review , 2005, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[30]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[31]  Eric A. Coleman,et al.  Case Studies of Electronic Health Records in Post-Acute and Long-Term Care , 2004 .

[32]  Steven M. Farmer,et al.  Pre-implementation attitudes toward the introduction of robots in a unionized environment , 1995 .

[33]  D. Bates,et al.  Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. , 2003, Archives of internal medicine.

[34]  E. Keeler,et al.  Costs and benefits of health information technology. , 2006, Evidence report/technology assessment.