MR Angiography and Development: Review of Clinical Applications

Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography (CR-MRA) is remarkable technique to image the vascular system from head to toe in diagnostic imaging armoury. Computed tomography is still an adequate imaging method of choice in few applications such as in follow-up studies in neuro-vascular pathologies, even then MRA is getting an equal share with tremendous improvements in spatial and temporal resolution. Current clinical indications for MRA of the supra-aortic vessels in head and neck include evaluation of steno-occlusive disease, assessment of AV-malformations in cerebral vessels, aneurysms, atherosclerotic disease and dissections. Moreover, as with other imaging applications, limiting contrast dose is a major issue, particularly with the increased risk of development of Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF) with higher doses of contrast agent [1] [2]. Therefore, contrast agents with higher relaxivity or higher concentration (1M), for which lower doses may be used, are beneficial for dynamic MRA studies.

[1]  Michael Sabel,et al.  Comparison of 18F-FET PET and 5-ALA fluorescence in cerebral gliomas , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[2]  H. Kauczor,et al.  Three-Dimensional Multiphase Time-Resolved Low-Dose Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography Using TWIST on a 32-Channel Coil at 3 T: A Quantitative and Qualitative Comparison of a Conventional Gadolinium Chelate With a High-Relaxivity Agent , 2010, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[3]  M. Essig,et al.  High-relaxivity contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance neuroimaging: a review , 2010, European Radiology.

[4]  H. Kauczor,et al.  Intraindividual comparison between gadopentetate dimeglumine and gadobutrol for magnetic resonance perfusion in normal brain and intracranial tumors at 3 tesla , 2009, Acta radiologica.

[5]  Peter Caravan,et al.  Influence of molecular parameters and increasing magnetic field strength on relaxivity of gadolinium- and manganese-based T1 contrast agents. , 2009, Contrast media & molecular imaging.

[6]  Peter Caravan,et al.  Protein-targeted gadolinium-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents: design and mechanism of action. , 2009, Accounts of chemical research.

[7]  U. Klose,et al.  Intra-individual Crossover Comparison of Gadobenate Dimeglumine and Gadopentetate Dimeglumine for Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Supraaortic Vessels at 3 Tesla , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[8]  Johannes T Heverhagen,et al.  Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography at 7 Tesla , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[9]  T. Vogl,et al.  Comparison of 1.0 M gadobutrol and 0.5 M gadopentate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI in 471 patients with known or suspected renal lesions: results of a multicenter, single-blind, interindividual, randomized clinical phase III trial , 2008, European Radiology.

[10]  M. Goyen,et al.  Gadofosveset-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography , 2008, Vascular health and risk management.

[11]  J. Heverhagen,et al.  Dose comparison of single versus double dose in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the renal arteries: intra-individual cross-over blinded trial using Gd-DTPA , 2008, European Radiology.

[12]  M. Knopp,et al.  Evaluation of intraaxial enhancing brain tumors on magnetic resonance imaging: intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine for visualization and assessment, and implications for surgical intervention. , 2007, Journal of neurosurgery.

[13]  B. Hamm,et al.  First-Pass Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) Using the Blood-Pool Contrast Medium Gadofosveset Trisodium: Comparison to Gadopentetate Dimeglumine , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[14]  J. Goo,et al.  CTA Contrast Enhancement of the Aorta and Pulmonary Artery: The Effect of Saline Chase Injected at Two Different Rates in a Canine Experimental Model , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[15]  A. Djamali,et al.  Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: risk factors and incidence estimation. , 2007, Radiology.

[16]  J. Heverhagen,et al.  Dose comparison of single‐ vs. double‐dose in contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries: Intraindividual cross‐over blinded trial using Gd‐DTPA , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  C. Fink,et al.  Magnetic resonance angiography with blood-pool contrast agents: future applications. , 2007, European radiology.

[18]  M. Essig,et al.  Magnetic resonance angiography of the head and neck vessels. , 2007, European radiology.

[19]  Gerald A Kirk,et al.  Gadodiamide-associated nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: why radiologists should be concerned. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  F. Cotton,et al.  The advantage of high relaxivity contrast agents in brain perfusion , 2006, European radiology.

[21]  W. Yuh,et al.  Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Central Nervous System Tumors: Agents, Mechanisms, and Applications , 2006, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[22]  F. Schick,et al.  Relaxivity of Gadopentetate Dimeglumine (Magnevist), Gadobutrol (Gadovist), and Gadobenate Dimeglumine (MultiHance) in Human Blood Plasma at 0.2, 1.5, and 3 Tesla , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[23]  J. Mintorovitch,et al.  Comparison of Magnetic Properties of MRI Contrast Media Solutions at Different Magnetic Field Strengths , 2005, Investigative radiology.

[24]  C. Catalano,et al.  MR angiography with MultiHance for imaging the supra-aortic vessels , 2004, European radiology.

[25]  M. Knopp,et al.  Primary and secondary brain tumors at MR imaging: bicentric intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine. , 2004, Radiology.

[26]  C. Catalano,et al.  Gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) vs gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA): improvement in intravascular signal intensity and contrast to noise ratio. , 2003, La Radiologia medica.

[27]  Martin Requardt,et al.  Contrast‐enhanced MR angiography of the run‐off vasculature: Intraindividual comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine with gadopentetate dimeglumine , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[28]  A. Sorensen,et al.  Do highly concentrated gadolinium chelates improve MR brain perfusion imaging? Intraindividually controlled randomized crossover concentration comparison study of 0.5 versus 1.0 mol/L gadobutrol. , 2003, Radiology.

[29]  F. Floemer,et al.  Intraindividueller Vergleich dreier Kontrastmittel (Gd-DTPA, Gd-BOPTA und Gd-BT-DO3A) mit der multiphasischen MR-Angiographie , 2003, Der Radiologe.

[30]  J. Debatin,et al.  Intraindividual Comparison of Gadopentetate Dimeglumine, Gadobenate Dimeglumine, and Gadobutrol for Pelvic 3D Magnetic Resonance Angiography , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[31]  M. Knopp,et al.  [Multiphasic MR angiography as an intra-individual comparison between the contrast agents Gd-DTPA, Gd-BOPTA, and Gd-BT-DO3A]. , 2003, Der Radiologe.

[32]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Coronary magnetic resonance angiography: technical developments and clinical applications. , 2003, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[33]  M. Bock,et al.  Assessment of Gadobenate Dimeglumine for Magnetic Resonance Angiography: Phase I Studies , 2002, Investigative radiology.

[34]  W. Yuh,et al.  Multiphase Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Abdominal and Pelvic Arteries: Results of a Bicenter Multireader Analysis , 2002, Investigative radiology.

[35]  W. Heindel,et al.  Value of 1.0-M gadolinium chelates: review of preclinical and clinical data on gadobutrol , 2002, European Radiology.

[36]  René M. Botnar,et al.  Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[37]  G Laub,et al.  3D magnetization‐prepared true‐FISP: A new technique for imaging coronary arteries , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[38]  J. Glockner,et al.  Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography: applications for abdominal imaging. , 2001, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[39]  D Nanz,et al.  3D contrast‐enhanced MR angiography of the run‐off vessels: Value of image subtraction , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[40]  M. Pomper,et al.  New techniques in MR imaging of brain tumors. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[41]  W. Nitz,et al.  Time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[42]  J. Debatin,et al.  Pelvic and lower extremity arterial imaging: diagnostic performance of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[43]  K. Lehmann,et al.  Evaluation of breath-hold contrast-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance angiography technique for imaging visceral abdominal arteries and veins. , 2000, Investigative radiology.

[44]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Diagnosis of renal vascular disease with MR angiography. , 1999, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[45]  L. Calabi,et al.  Gadobenate dimeglumine 0.5 M solution for injection (MultiHance) pharmaceutical formulation and physicochemical properties of a new magnetic resonance imaging contrast medium. , 1999, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[46]  M V Knopp,et al.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm. Detection of multilevel vascular pathology by time-resolved multiphase 3D gadolinium MR angiography: initial report. , 1999, Investigative radiology.

[47]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Contrast agents for MRA: Future directions , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[48]  Michael Bock,et al.  High‐resolution pulmonary arterio‐ and venography using multiple‐bolus multiphase 3D‐gd‐mRA , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[49]  K Scheffler,et al.  Contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography in occlusive disease of the pelvic and lower limb arteries: results of a prospective intraindividual comparative study with digital subtraction angiography in 76 patients. , 1999, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[50]  M. Bock,et al.  Renal arteries: optimization of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography with bolus-timing-independent fast multiphase acquisition in a single breath hold. , 1999, Radiology.

[51]  B R Rosen,et al.  Clinical applications of intracranial perfusion MR imaging. , 1999, Neuroimaging clinics of North America.

[52]  L. Axel,et al.  Renal artery stenosis: evaluation with conventional angiography versus gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. , 1999, Radiology.

[53]  J. V. van Engelshoven,et al.  MR angiography of run-off vessels , 1999, European Radiology.

[54]  E. Grabbe,et al.  Electrocardiograph-triggered two-dimensional time-of-flight versus optimized contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the peripheral arteries. , 1998, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[55]  Klaus Scheffler,et al.  Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography of Peripheral Vessels: Different Contrast Agent Applications and Sequence Strategies , 1998 .

[56]  M Takahashi,et al.  Three‐dimensional high‐resolution dynamic contrast‐enhanced MR angiography of the pelvis and lower extremities with use of a phased array coil and subtraction: Diagnostic accuracy , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[57]  S DeSena,et al.  Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the aorta and peripheral arteries: evaluation of a multistation examination using two gadopentetate dimeglumine infusions. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[58]  M. Bock,et al.  [Ultrafast MRI phlebography of the lungs]. , 1998, Der Radiologe.

[59]  S. O. Schoenberg,et al.  Ultraschnelle MR- Venographie der Lungen , 1998, Der Radiologe.

[60]  A. Shetty,et al.  Contrast‐enhanced 3D MRA with centric ordering in k space: A preliminary clinical experience in imaging the abdominal aorta and renal and peripheral arterial vasculature , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[61]  J Szumowski,et al.  Aortic and lower-extremity arterial disease: evaluation with MR angiography versus conventional angiography. , 1998, Radiology.

[62]  W. Steinbrich,et al.  Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of peripheral vessels. Different contrast agent applications and sequence strategies: a review. , 1998, Investigative radiology.

[63]  T L Chenevert,et al.  Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with magnetic resonance angiography. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[64]  B. Rosen,et al.  Signal‐to‐noise analysis of cerebral blood volume maps from dynamic NMR imaging studies , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[65]  R Frayne,et al.  Time‐resolved contrast‐enhanced 3D MR angiography , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[66]  T. Chenevert,et al.  Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. , 1995, Radiology.

[67]  B R Rosen,et al.  Mr contrast due to intravascular magnetic susceptibility perturbations , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[68]  J. Douglas,et al.  Value of 1 , 1982 .

[69]  Sloop Rd,et al.  Systemic arterial embolism arising from pulmonary thrombophlebitis. , 1971 .

[70]  J. H. Lium,et al.  Systemic arterial embolism arising from pulmonary thrombophlebitis. , 1971, The American surgeon.