Daclizumab in active relapsing multiple sclerosis (CHOICE study): a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, add-on trial with interferon beta

BACKGROUND Daclizumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody, reduced multiple sclerosis disease activity in previous non-randomised studies. We aimed to assess whether daclizumab reduces disease activity in patients with active relapsing multiple sclerosis who are receiving interferon beta treatment. METHODS We did a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study at 51 centres in the USA, Canada, Germany, Italy, and Spain. Patients with active relapsing multiple sclerosis who were taking interferon beta were randomly assigned to receive add-on subcutaneous daclizumab 2 mg/kg every 2 weeks (interferon beta and high-dose daclizumab group), daclizumab 1 mg/kg every 4 weeks (interferon beta and low-dose daclizumab group), or interferon beta and placebo for 24 weeks. The randomisation scheme was generated by Facet Biotech. All patients and assessors were masked to treatment with the exception of Facet Biotech bioanalysts who prepared data for the data safety monitoring board or generated pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic data, a drug accountability auditor, and the site pharmacist. The primary endpoint was total number of new or enlarged gadolinium contrast-enhancing lesions measured on brain MRI scans every 4 weeks between weeks 8 and 24. Effects of daclizumab on prespecified subsets of lymphocytes and quantitative T-cell proliferative response were assessed in an exploratory pharmacodynamic substudy. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00109161. FINDINGS From May, 2005, to March, 2006, 288 patients were assessed for eligibility, and 230 were randomly assigned to receive interferon beta and high-dose daclizumab (n=75), interferon beta and low-dose daclizumab (n=78), or interferon beta and placebo (n=77). The adjusted mean number of new or enlarged gadolinium contrast-enhancing lesions was 4.75 in the interferon beta and placebo group compared with 1.32 in the interferon beta and high-dose daclizumab group (difference 72%, 95% CI 34% to 88%; p=0.004) and 3.58 in the interferon beta and low-dose daclizumab group (25%, -76% to 68%; p=0.51). In the pharmacodynamic substudy, daclizumab was not associated with significant changes in absolute numbers of T cells, B cells, or natural killer cells, or T-cell proliferative response compared with interferon beta alone. The number of CD56(bright) natural killer cells was seven to eight times higher in both daclizumab groups than in the interferon beta and placebo group (interferon beta and low-dose daclizumab group p=0.002; interferon beta and high-dose daclizumab group p<0.0001). Common adverse events were equally distributed across groups. INTERPRETATION Add-on daclizumab treatment reduced the number of new or enlarged gadolinium contrast-enhancing lesions compared with interferon beta alone and might reduce multiple sclerosis disease activity to a greater extent than interferon beta alone. FUNDING Facet Biotech and Biogen Idec.

[1]  T. Waldmann,et al.  Advances in interleukin 2 receptor targeted treatment , 2000, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[2]  David E. Anderson,et al.  IL2RA Genetic Heterogeneity in Multiple Sclerosis and Type 1 Diabetes Susceptibility and Soluble Interleukin-2 Receptor Production , 2009, PLoS genetics.

[3]  A. Compston,et al.  Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines from the international panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis , 2001, Annals of neurology.

[4]  H. Wiendl,et al.  Immunoregulatory factors in multiple sclerosis patients during and after pregnancy: relevance of natural killer cells , 2007, Clinical and experimental immunology.

[5]  J. Rose,et al.  Treatment of multiple sclerosis with an anti–interleukin‐2 receptor monoclonal antibody , 2004, Annals of neurology.

[6]  P. Rutgeerts,et al.  A pilot study on the use of the humanized anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibody daclizumab in active ulcerative colitis. , 2003 .

[7]  H. McFarland,et al.  Regulatory T cells are reduced during anti-CD25 antibody treatment of multiple sclerosis. , 2009, Archives of neurology.

[8]  E. Reed,et al.  Assessing Relative Risks of Infection and Rejection: A Meta-analysis using an Immune Function Assay , 2006, Transplantation.

[9]  Stephen Sawcer,et al.  The complex genetics of multiple sclerosis: pitfalls and prospects , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  G. Gastl,et al.  Comparative in vitro study of the immunomodulatory activity of humanized and chimeric anti‐CD25 monoclonal antibodies , 2003, Clinical and experimental immunology.

[11]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Risk alleles for multiple sclerosis identified by a genomewide study. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  T. Waldmann,et al.  Effect of anti-CD25 antibody daclizumab in the inhibition of inflammation and stabilization of disease progression in multiple sclerosis. , 2009, Archives of neurology.

[13]  T. Waldmann,et al.  Humanized anti-CD25 (daclizumab) inhibits disease activity in multiple sclerosis patients failing to respond to interferon beta. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  J. Rose,et al.  Daclizumab phase II trial in relapsing and remitting multiple sclerosis , 2007, Neurology.

[15]  Hanne F. Harbo,et al.  Refining genetic associations in multiple sclerosis , 2008, The Lancet Neurology.

[16]  María M. Abad-Grau,et al.  IL2RA/CD25 Gene Polymorphisms: Uneven Association with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) , 2009, PloS one.

[17]  T. Waldmann,et al.  Regulatory CD56(bright) natural killer cells mediate immunomodulatory effects of IL-2Ralpha-targeted therapy (daclizumab) in multiple sclerosis. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  S. John,et al.  IL-2 Receptor Blockade Inhibits Late, But Not Early, IFN-γ and CD40 Ligand Expression in Human T Cells: Disruption of Both IL-12-Dependent and -Independent Pathways of IFN-γ Production , 2002, The Journal of Immunology.

[19]  H. Rossman Neutralizing antibodies to multiple sclerosis treatments. , 2004, Journal of managed care pharmacy : JMCP.

[20]  Pablo Tamayo,et al.  Cytometric profiling in multiple sclerosis uncovers patient population structure and a reduction of CD8low cells. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  A. Gottlieb,et al.  Successful in vivo blockade of CD25 (high-affinity interleukin 2 receptor) on T cells by administration of humanized anti-Tac antibody to patients with psoriasis. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[22]  David H. Miller,et al.  A controlled trial of natalizumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  L. Kappos,et al.  Neutralizing antibodies and efficacy of interferon beta-1a: a 4-year controlled study. , 2005 .

[24]  George Scott,et al.  Recommendations for the design and optimization of immunoassays used in the detection of host antibodies against biotechnology products. , 2004, Journal of immunological methods.