EVALUATION OF SACRAL RATIO AS A PROGNOSTIC FACTOR IN PATIENTS WITH ANORECTAL MALFORMATIONS

Correlation between sacral ratio and bowel function as well as fecal continence has been well documented in patients with anorectal malformations (ARMs). One hundred and twenty children with ARMs were investigated in this study. Sacral ratio (SR) was measured from pelvic X-rays of patients. Among these, 52 patients (43%) had no pelvic X-ray and were excluded from this study. SR was measured by drawing three horizontal lines, through iliac crests (A), tip of coccyx (B) and inferior point of sacroiliac joints (C). The SR was determined by dividing the distance between lines B and C to the distance between lines A and B. In the normal and well developed children, the average ratio is ≥0.74. The SR was higher than 0.70 in 12 (17.7%) children and less than 0.69 in 56 children (82.3%). Among children with ARMs and abnormal SR, 38 cases (68%) had SR of 0.50-0.69; 12 cases (21.5%)had SR of 0.40-0.49 and 6 cases (10.5%) had SR of 0-0.39. In children with ARMs and normal SR, the fecal incontinence was observed in 2 cases (16%). In contrast, 16 cases (29%) with ARMs and abnormal SR had functional disturbance, either fecal incontinence or soiling (P < 0.12). When the patients had an absent sacrum, they had zero possibility for bowel control and frequently had major urinary problems. The sacral feature and SR appear to have a direct influence on the final functional outcome in ARMs. The abnormal SR < 0.7 correlates with poor bowel function. In patients with ARMs, sacral segment and SR are important factors in post operative bowel function disturbance.

[1]  A. Peña Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: Results in the management of 332 cases of anorectal, malformations , 1988, Pediatric Surgery International.

[2]  V. Jasonni,et al.  Sacral development in anorectal malformations and in normal population , 2001, Pediatric Radiology.

[3]  R. D. De Filippo,et al.  Neurogenic bladder in infants born with anorectal malformations: comparison with spinal and urologic status. , 1998, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[4]  J. Hunter,et al.  Tethered cord and associated vertebral anomalies in children and infants with imperforate anus: evaluation with MR imaging and plain radiography. , 1996, Radiology.

[5]  R. Shamberger,et al.  Association of imperforate anus with occult spinal dysraphism. , 1995, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[6]  M. Levitt,et al.  Anorectal malformations , 1995, Seminars in pediatric surgery.

[7]  S. Greenfield,et al.  Urodynamic evaluation of the patient with an imperforate anus: a prospective study. , 1991, The Journal of urology.

[8]  K. Christensen,et al.  An epidemiological study of congenital anorectal malformations: 15 Danish birth cohorts followed for 7 years. , 1990, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[9]  J. Opitz,et al.  Imperforate anus in 700,000 consecutive liveborn infants. , 1986, American journal of medical genetics. Supplement.

[10]  P. Barnes,et al.  Imperforate anus: the neurologic implication of sacral abnormalities. , 1984, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[11]  I. Aaronson Anterior sacral meningocele, anal canal duplication cyst and covered anus occurring in one family. , 1970, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[12]  A. Desjardins Anatomie Radiographique du Squelette Normal (atlas) , 1927 .