Quantification of Uncertainty by Combining Forecasting with History Matching

Abstract Quantifying uncertainty in production forecasts is critical to making good reservoir management decisions, particularly for many current investment opportunities that require intensive technology and large investments, and that may have marginal profitability indicators. Reservoir studies are conducted to support decision making, but reservoir management decisions must often be made before completion of these studies. This paper presents a new approach to reservoir studies that combines production forecasting with history matching. The approach provides preliminary production forecasts much earlier in reservoir studies. More importantly, the approach provides estimates of uncertainty associated with the forecasts. This is accomplished by using the mismatch of history match runs to weight corresponding forecast runs. We illustrate application of the method to the 8-Sand reservoir in the Green Canyon 18 field, Gulf of Mexico. We observed that, as the accuracy of the model increased during the history match, the uncertainty of forecasted reserves decreased and the distribution of reserves stabilized. Early forecasts and associated estimates of uncertainty provided by our new method can be quite valuable to management in making investment decisions.

[1]  Nansen G. Saleri Reservoir Performance Forecasting: Acceleration by Parallel Planning , 1993 .

[2]  Frans J. T. Floris,et al.  Uncertainty estimation in volumetrics for supporting hydrocarbon exploration and production decision-making , 1998, Petroleum Geoscience.

[3]  Dominique Guerillot,et al.  Gradient Method and Bayesian Formalism Application to Petrophysical Parameter Characterization , 1996 .

[4]  A. R. Syversveen,et al.  Methods for quantifying the uncertainty of production forecasts: a comparative study , 2001, Petroleum Geoscience.

[5]  Martin Guillermo Alvarado Quantification of uncertainty during history matching , 2004 .

[6]  M. Marietta,et al.  Pilot Point Methodology for Automated Calibration of an Ensemble of conditionally Simulated Transmissivity Fields: 1. Theory and Computational Experiments , 1995 .

[7]  D. A. Bell,et al.  Applied Statistics , 1953, Nature.

[8]  Anthony Udegbunam Aniekwena Integrated reservoir study of the 8 reservoir of the Green Canyon 18 field , 2004 .

[9]  Henning Omre,et al.  Prediction of Hydrocarbon Pore Volume With Uncertainties , 1988 .

[10]  Emmanuel Manceau,et al.  Combination of Experimental Design and Joint Modeling Methods for Quantifying the Risk Associated With Deterministic and Stochastic Uncertainties - An Integrated Test Study , 2001 .

[11]  O. Dubrule,et al.  Quantifying the impact of structural uncertainties on Gross-Rock volume estimates , 1996 .

[12]  M. Nepveu Hydrocarbon production forecasting with limited data - how to fill the gaps , 2000 .

[13]  F. J. T. Floris Uncertainty estimation in volumetrics for supporting hydrocarbon EP decision making , 1998 .

[14]  J. Verdon,et al.  European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers , 2007 .

[15]  Henning Omre,et al.  An Integrated Approach to Prediction of Hydrocarbon in Place and Recoverable Reserve With Uncertainty Measures , 1992 .