Effects of Training With a Robot-Virtual Reality System Compared With a Robot Alone on the Gait of Individuals After Stroke

Background and Purpose— Training of the lower extremity (LE) using a robot coupled with virtual environments has shown to transfer to improved overground locomotion. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the transfer of training of LE movements to locomotion was greater using a virtual environment coupled with a robot or with the robot alone. Methods— A single, blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted. Eighteen individuals poststroke participated in a 4-week training protocol. One group trained with the robot virtual reality (VR) system and the other group trained with the robot alone. Outcome measures were temporal features of gait measured in a laboratory setting and the community. Results— Greater changes in velocity and distance walked were demonstrated for the group trained with the robotic device coupled with the VR than training with the robot alone. Similarly, significantly greater improvements in the distance walked and number of steps taken in the community were measured for the group that trained with robot coupled with the VR. These differences were maintained at 3 months’ follow-up. Conclusions— The study is the first to demonstrate that LE training of individuals with chronic hemiparesis using a robotic device coupled with VR improved walking ability in the laboratory and the community better than robot training alone.

[1]  Chao Qian,et al.  Population , 1940, State Rankings 2020: A Statistical View of America.

[2]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Importance of four variables of walking to patients with stroke , 1991, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[3]  R W Bohannon Strength Deficits Also Predict Gait Performance in Patients with Stroke , 1991, Perceptual and motor skills.

[4]  T. Olsen,et al.  Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1995, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  JoAnne K. Gronley,et al.  Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. , 1995, Stroke.

[6]  P. Duncan,et al.  Health status of individuals with mild stroke. , 1997, Stroke.

[7]  J. Liepert,et al.  Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. , 2000, Stroke.

[8]  J. Keating,et al.  Number needed to treat: a statistic relevant for physical therapists. , 2000, Physical therapy.

[9]  M Girone,et al.  Orthopedic rehabilitation using the "Rutgers ankle" interface. , 2000, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[10]  C. Burgar,et al.  Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  A. Stewart,et al.  Environmental demands associated with community mobility in older adults with and without mobility disabilities. , 2002, Physical therapy.

[12]  Jeffrey A. Lewis,et al.  Haptic effects for virtual reality-based post-stroke rehabilitation , 2003, 11th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 2003. HAPTICS 2003. Proceedings..

[13]  Ian D Cameron,et al.  Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[14]  J. Hanley,et al.  A task-orientated intervention enhances walking distance and speed in the first year post stroke: a randomized controlled trial , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[15]  Kim L Coleman,et al.  Accelerometer monitoring of home- and community-based ambulatory activity after stroke. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  DESCRIPTIVE PREDICTORS OF OUTCOMES FOLLOWING CONSTRAINT INDUCED MOVEMENT THERAPY (CIMT) FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH POST-STROKE HEMIPARESIS. , 2004 .

[17]  Judith E. Deutsch,et al.  IMPROVED GAIT AND ELEVATION SPEED OF INDIVIDUALS POST-STROKE AFTER LOWER EXTREMITY TRAINING IN VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS. , 2004 .

[18]  J. Bussmann,et al.  Validity of the prosthetic activity monitor to assess the duration and spatio-temporal characteristics of prosthetic walking , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[19]  Peter Langhorne,et al.  Effects of Augmented Exercise Therapy Time After Stroke: A Meta-Analysis , 2004, Stroke.

[20]  Lise R. Talbot,et al.  Identification of rehabilitation needs after a stroke: an exploratory study , 2004, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[21]  Henry L. Lew,et al.  Stepping over obstacles to improve walking in individuals with poststroke hemiplegia. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[22]  Jill Whitall,et al.  Stroke Rehabilitation Research: Time to Answer more Specific Questions? , 2004, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[23]  Howard Poizner,et al.  Development and application of virtual reality technology to improve hand use and gait of individuals post-stroke. , 2004, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[24]  M. Hallett,et al.  Virtual Reality–Induced Cortical Reorganization and Associated Locomotor Recovery in Chronic Stroke: An Experimenter-Blind Randomized Study , 2005, Stroke.

[25]  Mark Hallett,et al.  Cortical reorganization and associated functional motor recovery after virtual reality in patients with chronic stroke: an experimenter-blind preliminary study. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[26]  Carolynn Patten,et al.  Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[27]  A. Pollock,et al.  Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[28]  Nancy K Latham,et al.  Physical therapy interventions for patients with stroke in inpatient rehabilitation facilities. , 2005, Physical therapy.

[29]  Maureen K. Holden,et al.  Virtual Environments for Motor Rehabilitation: Review , 2005, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[30]  Francine Malouin,et al.  A Treadmill and Motion Coupled Virtual Reality System for Gait Training Post-Stroke , 2006, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[31]  S Hesse,et al.  Gait training after stroke: a critical reprisal. , 2006, Annales de readaptation et de medecine physique : revue scientifique de la Societe francaise de reeducation fonctionnelle de readaptation et de medecine physique.

[32]  J. Kleim,et al.  Motor training induces experience-specific patterns of plasticity across motor cortex and spinal cord. , 2006, Journal of applied physiology.

[33]  Ruth Dickstein,et al.  Motor imagery practice in gait rehabilitation of chronic post-stroke hemiparesis: four case studies , 2006, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[34]  Emily Fox,et al.  Effects of Stroke Severity and Training Duration on Locomotor Recovery After Stroke: A Pilot Study , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[35]  M. Morey,et al.  Using Step Activity Monitoring to Characterize Ambulatory Activity in Community‐Dwelling Older Adults , 2007, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[36]  J E Deutsch,et al.  Virtual Reality-Based Approaches to Enable Walking for People Poststroke , 2007, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[37]  Yea-Ru Yang,et al.  Virtual reality-based training improves community ambulation in individuals with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[38]  Peter Langhorne,et al.  Physiotherapy Treatment Approaches for Stroke , 2008 .