Comparison of tensile strength and early healing of acute repeat celiotomy through a ventral median or a right ventral paramedian approach.

OBJECTIVE To compare tensile strength, failure location, and histologic features after acute repeat celiotomy through a ventral median (RVM) or a right ventral paramedian (RVP) celiotomy in horses. STUDY DESIGN Ex vivo experimental study. ANIMALS Adult horses (N = 18). METHODS Twelve adult horses had original ventral median (OVM) celiotomy. Repeat celiotomy was performed 72 hours postoperatively through the original ventral median (RVM, N = 6) or a RVP (N = 6) celiotomy. Celiotomies were scored daily for edema, drainage, and dehiscence. Fourteen days after repeat celiotomy, horses were euthanatized and abdominal wall containing celiotomy(ies) were collected for biomechanical and histological evaluation. The abdominal wall of control horses (N = 6; no celiotomy) was collected for biomechanical testing. Vital sign variables, incisional edema, and histologic scores were compared using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Incisional fibrotic depth and tensile strength per unit length (N/cm) was compared using repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS RVM and RVP horses had significantly less tensile strength compared to control horses, but no differences were observed between RVM and RVP horses. No differences in healing, inflammation, infection, or necrosis of repeat celiotomies was observed, but RVP horses accumulated more fibrin and hemorrhage within the incision. RVP horses had significantly greater incisional edema scores, but incisional drainage was more frequent in RVM horses. CONCLUSIONS Acute repeat celiotomy through a RVM incision results in similar incisional healing and tensile strength compared with repeat celiotomy through a RVP incision.

[1]  S. Hendrick,et al.  Ex vivo comparison of bursting strength of ventral median and right ventral paramedian celiotomies in horses. , 2013, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[2]  L. Southwood,et al.  Effect of intraperitoneal PERIDAN™ concentrate adhesion reduction device on clinical findings, infection, and tissue healing in an adult horse jejunojejunostomy model. , 2012, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[3]  C. S. Álvarez,et al.  Guidelines for specialized nutritional and metabolic support in the critically-ill patient: Update. Consensus SEMICYUC-SENPE: Gastrointestinal surgery , 2011 .

[4]  G. Blackburn.  Metabolic considerations in management of surgical patients. , 2011, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[5]  D. Holtkamp,et al.  Occurrence of incisional complications and associated risk factors using a right ventral paramedian celiotomy incision in 159 horses. , 2011, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[6]  A. Bathe,et al.  Outcome and long-term follow-up of 20 horses undergoing surgery for caecal impaction: a retrospective study (2000-2008). , 2010, Equine veterinary journal.

[7]  T. Mair,et al.  Are horses that undergo an exploratory laparotomy for correction of a right dorsal displacement of the large colon predisposed to post operative colic, compared to other forms of large colon displacement? , 2009, Equine veterinary journal.

[8]  C. Proudman,et al.  Intra-abdominal adhesions in horses: a retrospective evaluation of repeat laparotomy in 99 horses with acute gastrointestinal disease. , 2008, Veterinary journal.

[9]  T. Foutz,et al.  Effects of activity on avian gastrocnemius tendon. , 2007, Poultry science.

[10]  C. Proudman,et al.  Factors affecting long-term survival of horses recovering from surgery of the small intestine. , 2010, Equine veterinary journal.

[11]  N. P. French,et al.  Modelling long-term survival of horses following surgery for large intestinal disease. , 2010, Equine veterinary journal.

[12]  T. Mair,et al.  Survival and complication rates in 300 horses undergoing surgical treatment of colic. Part 2: Short-term complications. , 2010, Equine veterinary journal.

[13]  T. Mair,et al.  Survival and complication rates in 300 horses undergoing surgical treatment of colic. Part 4: Early (acute) relaparotomy. , 2010, Equine veterinary journal.

[14]  J. Smith,et al.  Equine surgical colic: risk factors for postoperative complications. , 2010, Equine veterinary journal.

[15]  A. Blikslager,et al.  Surgical and postoperative factors influencing short-term survival of horses following small intestinal resection: 92 cases (1994-2001). , 2010, Equine veterinary journal.

[16]  J. Smith,et al.  Long-term survival of equine surgical colic cases. Part 1: patterns of mortality and morbidity. , 2010, Equine veterinary journal.

[17]  D. Freeman,et al.  Abdominal closure and complications , 2002 .

[18]  T. Divers,et al.  Manual of equine gastroenterology , 2002 .

[19]  B. Rohrbach,et al.  Tissue strength and wound morphology of the equine linea alba after ventral median celiotomy. , 2000, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[20]  N. Cohen,et al.  Risk factors for wound infection following celiotomy in horses. , 1997, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[21]  A. T. Fischer,et al.  Small intestinal herniation through the epiploic foramen: 53 cases (1987-1993). , 1995, Equine veterinary journal.

[22]  E Y Chao,et al.  Effects of freeze/thaw conditioning on the tensile properties and failure mode of bone‐muscle‐bone units: A biomechanical and histological study in dogs , 1995, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[23]  T. Phillips,et al.  Retrospective analysis of the results of 151 exploratory laparotomies in horses with gastrointestinal disease. , 1993, Equine veterinary journal.

[24]  R. Todhunter,et al.  Retrospective evaluation of repeat celiotomy in 53 horses with acute gastrointestinal disease. , 1990, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[25]  C. McIlwraith,et al.  Incisional hernias in the horse. Incidence and predisposing factors. , 1989, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[26]  B. Huskamp.  Some problems associated with intestinal surgery in the horse. , 1977, Equine veterinary journal.