Prospective Molecular Profiling of Canine Cancers Provides a Clinically Relevant Comparative Model for Evaluating Personalized Medicine (PMed) Trials

Background Molecularly-guided trials (i.e. PMed) now seek to aid clinical decision-making by matching cancer targets with therapeutic options. Progress has been hampered by the lack of cancer models that account for individual-to-individual heterogeneity within and across cancer types. Naturally occurring cancers in pet animals are heterogeneous and thus provide an opportunity to answer questions about these PMed strategies and optimize translation to human patients. In order to realize this opportunity, it is now necessary to demonstrate the feasibility of conducting molecularly-guided analysis of tumors from dogs with naturally occurring cancer in a clinically relevant setting. Methodology A proof-of-concept study was conducted by the Comparative Oncology Trials Consortium (COTC) to determine if tumor collection, prospective molecular profiling, and PMed report generation within 1 week was feasible in dogs. Thirty-one dogs with cancers of varying histologies were enrolled. Twenty-four of 31 samples (77%) successfully met all predefined QA/QC criteria and were analyzed via Affymetrix gene expression profiling. A subsequent bioinformatics workflow transformed genomic data into a personalized drug report. Average turnaround from biopsy to report generation was 116 hours (4.8 days). Unsupervised clustering of canine tumor expression data clustered by cancer type, but supervised clustering of tumors based on the personalized drug report clustered by drug class rather than cancer type. Conclusions Collection and turnaround of high quality canine tumor samples, centralized pathology, analyte generation, array hybridization, and bioinformatic analyses matching gene expression to therapeutic options is achievable in a practical clinical window (<1 week). Clustering data show robust signatures by cancer type but also showed patient-to-patient heterogeneity in drug predictions. This lends further support to the inclusion of a heterogeneous population of dogs with cancer into the preclinical modeling of personalized medicine. Future comparative oncology studies optimizing the delivery of PMed strategies may aid cancer drug development.

[1]  David S. Wishart,et al.  DrugBank 3.0: a comprehensive resource for ‘Omics’ research on drugs , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[2]  J. Mesirov,et al.  Chemosensitivity prediction by transcriptional profiling , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  K. Lindblad-Toh,et al.  The dog as a cancer model , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[4]  C. Ku,et al.  Clinical Cancer Genome and Precision Medicine , 2012, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[5]  John P. Overington,et al.  How many drug targets are there? , 2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[6]  R. Larson,et al.  Imatinib induces hematologic and cytogenetic responses in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in myeloid blast crisis: results of a phase II study. , 2002, Blood.

[7]  T. Fan,et al.  Rapamycin Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Relationships in Osteosarcoma: A Comparative Oncology Study in Dogs , 2010, PloS one.

[8]  C. Perry,et al.  Trastuzumab , 2002, Drugs.

[9]  D. Argyle Veterinary and comparative oncology, a decade in cancer research. , 2012, Veterinary and comparative oncology.

[10]  M. Paoloni,et al.  Translation of new cancer treatments from pet dogs to humans , 2008, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[11]  Ximing J. Yang,et al.  Detection of DNA copy number changes and oncogenic signaling abnormalities from gene expression data reveals MYC activation in high-grade papillary renal cell carcinoma. , 2007, Cancer research.

[12]  L. Ofiara,et al.  The importance of a satisfactory biopsy for the diagnosis of lung cancer in the era of personalized treatment. , 2012, Current oncology.

[13]  Jeremy Miller,et al.  A Pilot Trial Testing the Feasibility of Using Molecular-Guided Therapy in Patients with Recurrent Neuroblastoma , 2012 .

[14]  Veterinary Co-operative Oncology Group - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (VCOG-CTCAE) following chemotherapy or biological antineoplastic therapy in dogs and cats v1.0. , 2004, Veterinary and comparative oncology.

[15]  P. Meltzer,et al.  Canine tumor cross-species genomics uncovers targets linked to osteosarcoma progression , 2009, BMC Genomics.

[16]  J. Nevins,et al.  Mouse models of cancers: opportunities to address heterogeneity of human cancer and evaluate therapeutic strategies , 2010, Journal of Molecular Medicine.

[17]  S. Libutti,et al.  Launching a Novel Preclinical Infrastructure: Comparative Oncology Trials Consortium Directed Therapeutic Targeting of TNFα to Cancer Vasculature , 2009, PloS one.

[18]  James A. Cuff,et al.  Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog , 2005, Nature.

[19]  Marie R. Mooney,et al.  A multi-site feasibility study for personalized medicine in canines with Osteosarcoma , 2013, Journal of Translational Medicine.

[20]  Francisco M. De La Vega,et al.  Genome and Transcriptome Sequencing in Prospective Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Uncovers Therapeutic Vulnerabilities , 2012, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[21]  Razelle Kurzrock,et al.  Personalized Medicine in a Phase I Clinical Trials Program: The MD Anderson Cancer Center Initiative , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[22]  Jae K. Lee,et al.  A strategy for predicting the chemosensitivity of human cancers and its application to drug discovery , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  J. Khan,et al.  A Compendium of Canine Normal Tissue Gene Expression , 2011, PloS one.

[24]  E. Macewen,et al.  Spontaneously Occurring Tumors of Companion Animals as Models for Human Cancer , 2000, Cancer investigation.

[25]  L. Hood,et al.  Systems cancer medicine: towards realization of predictive, preventive, personalized and participatory (P4) medicine , 2012, Journal of internal medicine.

[26]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Evolution of an adenocarcinoma in response to selection by targeted kinase inhibitors , 2010, Genome Biology.

[27]  David Veenstra,et al.  How comparative effectiveness research can help advance 'personalized medicine' in cancer treatment. , 2011, Health affairs.

[28]  Joe W. Gray,et al.  What are we learning from the cancer genome? , 2012, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[29]  Michael Bittner,et al.  Pilot study using molecular profiling of patients' tumors to find potential targets and select treatments for their refractory cancers. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[30]  Jeremy Miller,et al.  Identifying disease-specific genes based on their topological significance in protein networks , 2009, BMC Syst. Biol..

[31]  C. Fan,et al.  Gene profiling of canine B-cell lymphoma reveals germinal center and postgerminal center subtypes with different survival times, modeling human DLBCL. , 2013, Cancer research.

[32]  T. Stricker,et al.  Molecular profiling of cancer--the future of personalized cancer medicine: a primer on cancer biology and the tools necessary to bring molecular testing to the clinic. , 2011, Seminars in oncology.

[33]  J. Khan,et al.  Screening a panel of drugs with diverse mechanisms of action yields potential therapeutic agents against neuroblastoma , 2009, Cancer biology & therapy.

[34]  Paul A Clemons,et al.  The Connectivity Map: Using Gene-Expression Signatures to Connect Small Molecules, Genes, and Disease , 2006, Science.

[35]  Veterinary cooperative oncology group - common terminology criteria for adverse events (VCOG-CTCAE) following chemotherapy or biological antineoplastic therapy in dogs and cats v1.1. , 2016, Veterinary and comparative oncology.

[36]  S. Costantini,et al.  Molecular diagnostics and personalized medicine in oncology: Challenges and opportunities , 2013, Journal of cellular biochemistry.