Attending but not seeing: The "other race" effect in face and person perception studied through change blindness

We used a change blindness paradigm to examine the “other race” effect in perception. White Caucasian and Indian Asian participants viewed scenes in which White Caucasian and Indian Asian students were present. Changes were made either to the faces of the students, to their bodies or to an independent object in the background. Changes in faces were detected faster than changes in the bodies, which were in turn detected faster than changes in the background. For face detection there was a crossover interaction, with changes in White Caucasian faces detected faster than changes in Indian Asian faces by White Caucasian participants, whilst the opposite result occurred for changes in Indian Asian faces. In contrast, there was no effect of race on the detection of body-part changes or on the detection of changes to background objects. The results suggest that participants of both races attended equally well to subjects from the other race in the scene, but despite this they remained less sensitive to “other race” faces. Change blindness can provide a useful way of analysing attentional and memorial processes in social contexts.

[1]  I. Rock,et al.  The effect of inattention on form perception. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Structural aspects of face recognition and the other-race effect , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[3]  D. Levin CLASSIFYING FACES BY RACE : THE STRUCTURE OF FACE CATEGORIES , 1996 .

[4]  T. Valentine The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology a Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face Recognition , 2022 .

[5]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  TO SEE OR NOT TO SEE: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes , 1997 .

[6]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[7]  S. Werner,et al.  Is "Change Blindness" Attenuated by Domain-specific Expertise? An Expert-Novices Comparison of Change Detection in Football Images , 2000 .

[8]  D. Simons,et al.  Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction , 1998 .

[9]  A. G. Goldstein,et al.  Development of differential recognition for own- and other-race faces. , 1982, The Journal of psychology.

[10]  D. Levin Race as a visual feature: using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[11]  A. Kingstone,et al.  The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze , 1998 .

[12]  Daniel J. Simons,et al.  Current Approaches to Change Blindness , 2000 .

[13]  R. Galper,et al.  “Functional Race Membership” and Recognition of Faces , 1973, Perceptual and motor skills.

[14]  R. Malpass,et al.  Recognition for faces of own and other race. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  P. Salovey,et al.  Perceived distributions of the characteristics of in-group and out-group members: empirical evidence and a computer simulation. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Judging face similarity in own and other races. , 1978 .