Effect of Channel Fading and Time-to-Trigger Duration on Handover Performance in UAV Networks

Owning to the agility and the transform between line-of-sight (LoS) and non-LoS (NLoS) links, the time-varying channel in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) networks leads to the frequent handover (HO). Hence, existing HO models only considering path-loss are unable to analyze the unnecessary HO caused by fading. In this letter, a path-loss-plus-fading model with HO parameters is considered for HO in UAV networks and the impact of channel fading on HO performance is theoretically characterized, where HO states during time-to-trigger (TTT) duration is discretized to analyze the HO trigger probability. By modeling the fading as Nakagami- $m$ distribution, a discrete time Markov chain is utilized where the user’s states along the trajectory is discretized into multiple HO states by coherence time. Based on the discretization, HO failure (HOF) and ping-pong (PP) probabilities are derived by analyzing the HO state probabilities during the TTT duration. The results show that the transform between LoS and NLoS links increases HOF probability, and there is a tradeoff between HOF and PP probabilities when configuring TTT duration.

[1]  Meryem Simsek,et al.  Analysis of Handover Failures in Heterogeneous Networks With Fading , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[2]  Hongtao Zhang,et al.  Handover Probability Analysis of Anchor-Based Multi-Connectivity in 5G User-Centric Network , 2019, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[3]  Wanqing Huang,et al.  Analysis of Handover Probability Based on Equivalent Model for 3D UAV Networks , 2019, 2019 IEEE 30th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC).

[4]  Walid Saad,et al.  Machine Learning for Wireless Connectivity and Security of Cellular-Connected UAVs , 2018, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[5]  Yunfei Chen,et al.  Effect of User Mobility and Channel Fading on the Outage Performance of UAV Communications , 2020, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[6]  Kandeepan Sithamparanathan,et al.  Optimal LAP Altitude for Maximum Coverage , 2014, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[7]  Tommy Svensson,et al.  Modeling and Analyzing the Cross-Tier Handover in Heterogeneous Networks , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[8]  Walid Saad,et al.  Performance Analysis of Mobile Cellular-Connected Drones under Practical Antenna Configurations , 2020, ICC 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[9]  L. Muche,et al.  Contact and Chord Length Distribution Functions of the Poisson-Voronoi Tessellation in High Dimensions , 2010, Advances in Applied Probability.

[10]  Mei Song,et al.  Effect of Outdated CSI on Handover Decisions in Dense Networks , 2017, IEEE Communications Letters.

[11]  Hongtao Zhang,et al.  UAV-Assisted Networks Through a Tunable Dependent Model , 2020, IEEE Communications Letters.

[12]  Andrea Zanella,et al.  Context-Aware Handover Policies in HetNets , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[13]  Harpreet S. Dhillon,et al.  Handover Probability in Drone Cellular Networks , 2020, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[14]  Ilsun You,et al.  Efficient Management and Fast Handovers in Software Defined Wireless Networks Using UAVs , 2017, IEEE Network.