Role of the medial prefrontal cortex in acquired distinctiveness and equivalence of cues.

In the present study, the authors examined the role of the medial prefrontal cortex in acquired equivalence and distinctiveness of cues. Rats were placed in 4 experimental contexts (A, B, C, and D) where they received presentations of 2 auditory stimuli (X and Y). In Contexts A and B, X was paired with food and Y was not, whereas in Contexts C and D, Y was paired with food and X was not. Rats that received sham lesions and those with lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex acquired this configural discrimination equally readily. Rats then received many pellets in A but not in C. After this training, sham-lesion rats exhibited more magazine activity in B than in D (an acquired distinctiveness/acquired equivalence effect), whereas those with medial prefrontal cortex lesions did not. These results indicate that the medial prefrontal cortex is involved in the process by which experience with stimuli influences the degree of generalization between them.

[1]  J. Pearce,et al.  Acquired distinctiveness is controlled by stimulus relevance not correlation with reward , 1999 .

[2]  D. Paré,et al.  Ultrastructural organization of medial prefrontal inputs to the rhinal cortices , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[3]  N. Mackintosh.  The psychology of animal learning , 1974 .

[4]  V. Brown,et al.  Medial Frontal Cortex Mediates Perceptual Attentional Set Shifting in the Rat , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  R. C. Honey,et al.  Acquired equivalence and distinctiveness of cues: II. Neural manipulations and their implications. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[6]  G. Paxinos,et al.  The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates , 1983 .

[7]  R. C. Honey,et al.  Involvement of the entorhinal cortex in a process of attentional modulation: evidence from a novel variant of an IDS/EDS procedure. , 2001, Behavioral neuroscience.

[8]  N. Mackintosh,et al.  Intradimensional and extradimensional shift learning by pigeons , 1969 .

[9]  Clive Hollands,et al.  THE ANIMALS (SCIENTIFIC PROCEDURES) ACT 1986 , 1986, The Lancet.

[10]  D. Lawrence.  Acquired distinctiveness of cues; transfer between discrimination on the basis of familiarity with the stimulus. , 1949, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  R. C. Honey,et al.  A novel contextual dimension for use with an operant chamber: from simple to hierarchical forms of learning. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[12]  R. Lubow,et al.  Latent inhibition: the effect of nonreinforced pre-exposure to the conditional stimulus. , 1959, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[13]  T. Robbins,et al.  Dissociation in prefrontal cortex of affective and attentional shifts , 1996, Nature.

[14]  R. C. Honey,et al.  Acquired equivalence and distinctiveness of cues: I. Exploring a neural network approach. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[15]  R. C. Honey,et al.  Acquired equivalence and distinctiveness of cues. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[16]  R. Rescorla.  "Configural" conditioning in discrete-trial bar pressing. , 1972, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.