Development of a partnering performance index (PPI) for construction projects in Hong Kong: a Delphi study

Over the past decade, research studies on benefits, critical success factors, difficulties, process, conceptual and theoretical models of construction partnering have been ubiquitous in the construction management discipline. In fact, there is adequate evidence that an increasing number of client organizations are adopting a partnering approach to undertake their building and construction projects both locally and worldwide during the last decade. With the perceived benefits that partnering brings about, research into Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to evaluate the success of partnering projects in construction becomes vital as it can help set a benchmark for measuring the performance level of partnering projects. However, although there are some related studies and papers on this research area, few, if any, comprehensive and systematic studies focus on developing a comprehensive, objective, reliable and practical performance evaluation model for partnering projects. A model has been developed using the Delphi survey technique to objectively measure the performance of partnering projects in Hong Kong based on a consolidated KPIs' conceptual framework previously developed for partnering projects. Four rounds of Delphi questionnaire survey were conducted with 31 construction experts in Hong Kong. The results reveal that the top seven weighted KPIs to evaluate the success of partnering projects in Hong Kong were: (1) time performance; (2) cost performance; (3) top management commitment; (4) trust and respect; (5) quality performance; (6) effective communications; and (7) innovation and improvement. A statistically significant consensus on the top seven weighted KPIs was also obtained. Finally, a composite Partnering Performance Index (PPI) for partnering projects in Hong Kong was derived to provide an all‐round assessment of partnering performance. Different partnering projects can now be assessed on the same basis for benchmarking purposes. Construction senior executives and project managers can thus use the Index to measure, evaluate and improve the performance of their partnering projects to strive for construction excellence. Although the PPI was developed locally in Hong Kong, the research method could be replicated in other parts of the world to produce similar indices for international comparison. Such an extension would aid the understanding of managing partnering projects across different geographic locations.

[1]  Malik Beshir Malik,et al.  Applied Linear Regression , 2005, Technometrics.

[2]  Ioannis E. Tsolas,et al.  Sustainable construction and drivers of change in Greece: a Delphi study , 2006 .

[3]  Katherine Cabaniss,et al.  Counseling and Computer Technology in the New Millennium--An Internet Delphi Study , 2001 .

[4]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Establishment of Critical Success Factors for Construction Partnering , 2000 .

[5]  George Wright,et al.  The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis , 1999 .

[6]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Partnering research in construction , 2000 .

[7]  V. Barnett,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1975 .

[8]  Lai-kit. Chow,et al.  Incorporating fuzzy membership functions and gap analysis concept intoperformance evaluation of engineering consultants: Hong Kong study , 2005 .

[9]  Apc Chan,et al.  An analysis of project partnering in Hong Kong , 2002 .

[10]  H. A. Lingstone,et al.  The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications , 1976 .

[11]  Olaf Helmer,et al.  SYSTEMATIC USE OF EXPERT OPINIONS , 1967 .

[12]  Michael H. Kutner.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1974 .

[13]  Daniel Lerner,et al.  Quantity and Quality , 1999, Science.

[14]  Osama Abudayyeh,et al.  Partnering: A Team Building Approach to Quality Construction Management , 1994 .

[15]  Susan McKay,et al.  The Art of Modeling Dynamic Systems: Forecasting for Chaos, Randomness and Determinism , 1991 .

[16]  N. Schwarz.  Cognition and Communication , 2004, Inner Worlds.

[17]  Robert E. Spekman,et al.  Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques , 1994 .

[18]  John W. Dickey,et al.  Analytic techniques in urban and regional planning: With applications in public administration and affairs , 1978 .

[19]  Sai On Cheung,et al.  An automated partnering monitoring system—Partnering Temperature Index , 2003 .

[20]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  An empirical study of the benefits of construction partnering in Hong Kong , 2003 .

[21]  D. Morgan.  The Focus Group Guidebook , 1997 .

[22]  Kerry London,et al.  Construction Management: New Directions , 2002 .

[23]  Erik Larson,et al.  Project Partnering: Results of Study of 280 Construction Projects , 1995 .

[24]  H. Edmunds.  The Focus Group Research Handbook , 1999 .

[25]  J. K. Bennett,et al.  The Seven Pillars of Partnering: A Guide to Second Generation Partnering , 1998 .

[26]  Olaf Helmer,et al.  ANALYSIS OF THE FUTURE: THE DELPHI METHOD , 1967 .

[27]  Adrian Oldknow,et al.  Mathematics of models : continuous and discrete dynamical systems , 1993 .

[28]  Kumares C. Sinha,et al.  DELPHI STUDY ON BRIDGE CONDITION RATING AND EFFECTS OF IMPROVEMENTS , 1991 .

[29]  V. Kodur,et al.  Stress-strain curves for high strength concrete at elevated temperatures , 2004 .

[30]  S. Weisberg.  Applied Linear Regression: Weisberg/Applied Linear Regression 3e , 2005 .

[31]  A. Bryman.  Quantity and quality in social research , 1988 .

[32]  Keith D. Hampson,et al.  Project alliancing vs project partnering: a case study of the Australian National Museum Project , 2002 .

[33]  Patrick T.I. Lam,et al.  Application of Delphi method in selection of procurement systems for construction projects , 2001 .

[34]  Apc Chan,et al.  A comparative study of project partnering practices in Hong Kong , 2004 .

[35]  Ross B. Corotis,et al.  Delphi Methods: Theory and Design Load Application , 1981 .

[36]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  Key performance indicators for measuring construction success , 2004 .

[37]  Patrick T.I. Lam,et al.  Partnering for construction excellence—A reality or myth? , 2006 .

[38]  Donn E. Hancher,et al.  Partnering: Contracting for the Future , 1990 .

[39]  John B. L. Robinson,et al.  Delphi Methodology for Economic Impact Assessment , 1991 .

[40]  Sai On Cheung,et al.  Effective partnering tools in construction: a case study on MTRC TKE contract 604 in Hong Kong , 2004 .