Prototyping Artificial Jaws for the Bristol Dento-Munch Robo-Simulator; `A parallel robot to test dental components and materials'

This paper presents the robot periphery for the robotic dental testing simulator based on a parallel robot (i.e. stewart platform) to simulate the wear of materials on dental components, such as individual teeth, crowns or a full set of teeth. Current chewing simulators move in only 1 or 2 degrees of freedom (DOF) and therefore lack accuracy. The Bristol simulator has been developed to replicate accurate human chewing patterns in 6-DOF. This paper describes the artificial jaws and compliance module of the robot. The jaws have been reverse engineered and represent a human-like mandible and maxilla with artificial teeth. Each clinically fabricated tooth consists of a crown and glass ceramic roots which are connected using resin cement. Correct occlusion of the artificial jaws assembly was assessed by a dental teaching simulator. A compliance module had to be built between the lower jaw and the robot platform to sustain the fluctuating forces that occur during normal chewing in the occlusal contact areas, where these high bite forces are major causes of dental component failure. A strain gauge force transducer has been integrated into the machined lower jaw, underneath the second molars, to measure axial biting forces applied to the posterior teeth.

[1]  A. Petschelt,et al.  Comparison of two- and three-body wear of glass-ionomers and composites. , 1996, European journal of oral sciences.

[2]  T R Murphy,et al.  The timing and mechanism of the human masticatory stroke. , 1965, Archives of oral biology.

[3]  R. DeLong,et al.  An artificial oral environment for testing dental materials , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  S D Heintze,et al.  Wear of ten dental restorative materials in five wear simulators--results of a round robin test. , 2005, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[5]  S H Teoh,et al.  Bruxing-type dental wear simulator for ranking of dental restorative materials. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[6]  D. Stewart A Platform with Six Degrees of Freedom , 1965 .

[7]  P M Marquis,et al.  Wear of three dental composites under different testing conditions. , 2002, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[8]  K. Ooya,et al.  An evaluation of the curve of Spee in the maxilla and mandible of human permanent healthy dentitions. , 2004, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[9]  K Alemzadeh,et al.  Prototyping a robotic dental testing simulator , 2007, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[10]  R L Erickson,et al.  The Influence of Admixing Microfiller to Small-particle Composite Resin on Wear, Tensile Strength, Hardness, and Surface Roughness , 1989, Journal of dental research.

[11]  P. Martus,et al.  Sliding wear of 19 commercially available composites and compomers. , 2004, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[12]  S. Heintze How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods. , 2006, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[13]  T. Reich,et al.  In-vitro-Testverfahren zur Evaluation dentaler Restaurationssysteme. 1. Computergesteuerter Kausimulator , 1990 .

[14]  Atsuo Takanishi,et al.  Human skull robot as a mechanical patient simulator for mouth opening and closing training , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Expanding the Societal Role of Robotics in the the Next Millennium (Cat. No.01CH37180).

[15]  R. Frankenberger,et al.  Mechanical properties and three-body wear of veneering composites and their matrices. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[16]  P. Pallav,et al.  Occlusal wear simulation with the ACTA wear machine. , 1994, Journal of dentistry.

[17]  J. H. Koolstra Dynamics of the human masticatory system. , 2002, Critical reviews in oral biology and medicine : an official publication of the American Association of Oral Biologists.

[18]  J. H. Koolstra,et al.  A three-dimensional mathematical model of the human masticatory system predicting maximum possible bite forces. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  Kazem Alemzadeh Prototyping a dental mastication robot simulator , 2006 .