Comparison of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of sugar beet pulp: performance, dewaterability and foam control.

Digestion of sugar beet pulp was assessed in relation to biogas and methane production, foaming potential, and digestate dewaterability. Four 4-litre working volume digesters were operated mesophilically (37±0.5 °C) and four thermophilically (55±0.5 °C) over three hydraulic retention times. Digesters were operated in duplicate at organic loading rates (OLR) of 4 and 5 g volatile solids l(-1) day(-1) without water addition. Thermophilic digestion gave higher biogas and methane productivity than mesophilic and was able to operate at the higher OLR, where mesophilic digestion showed signs of instability. Digestate dewaterability was assessed using capillary suction time and frozen image centrifugation. The occurrence of, or potential for, stable foam formation was assessed using a foaming potential test. Thermophilic operation allowed higher loadings to be applied without loss of performance, and gave a digestate with superior dewatering characteristics and very little foaming potential.

[1]  D. Sales,et al.  Pilot‐scale anaerobic thermophilic digester treating municipal sludge , 2006 .

[2]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[3]  Khaled M. Ghanem,et al.  Methane production from beet pulp , 1992 .

[4]  B. Demirel,et al.  Trace element requirements of agricultural biogas digesters during biological conversion of renewable biomass to methane , 2011 .

[5]  M. Labat,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of sugar beet pulps , 1984, Biotechnology Letters.

[6]  M. Drtil,et al.  Anaerobic biodegradation of sugar beet pulp , 2004, Biodegradation.

[7]  L. S. Herbert,et al.  Effect of sludge age and substrate composition on the settling and dewatering characteristics of activated sludge , 1983 .

[8]  S. Brown,et al.  Operating a High-Rate Digester: The Southern Water Experience , 2002 .

[9]  O. Yenigün,et al.  Ammonia inhibition in anaerobic digestion: A review , 2013 .

[10]  P. Jeníček,et al.  The contribution of thermophilic anaerobic digestion to the stable operation of wastewater sludge treatment. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[11]  J. C. Converse,et al.  Improved alkalimetric monitoring for anaerobic digestion of high-strength wastes , 1986 .

[12]  Wilson Parawira,et al.  Energy production from agricultural residues: High methane yields in pilot-scale two-stage anaerobic digestion , 2008 .

[13]  Krishna R. Pagilla,et al.  Causes and effects of foaming in anaerobic sludge digesters , 1997 .

[14]  K. Svardal,et al.  Biogas from sugar beet press pulp as substitute of fossil fuel in sugar beet factories. , 2008, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[15]  Y. Li,et al.  Mesophilic and Thermophilic Digestion of Thickened Waste Activated Sludge: A Comparative Study , 2010 .

[16]  Xiaoli Chai,et al.  Novel insights into enhanced dewaterability of waste activated sludge by Fe(II)-activated persulfate oxidation. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[17]  K. Keiding,et al.  Physico-chemical characteristics of full scale sewage sludges with implications to dewatering. , 2002, Water research.

[18]  P. Pullammanappallil,et al.  Single-stage, batch, leach-bed, thermophilic anaerobic digestion of spent sugar beet pulp. , 2008, Bioresource Technology.

[19]  Duu-Jong Lee,et al.  Soluble microbial products (SMP) and soluble extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) from wastewater sludge , 2006, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[20]  N. Massart,et al.  THE ROOT CAUSE OF EXCESSIVE ANAEROBIC DIGESTER FOAMING , 2006 .

[21]  Pratap Pullammanappallil,et al.  BIOGASIFICATION OF WASTE STREAMS AND BYPRODUCTS FROM SUGAR BEET PROCESSING , 2007 .

[22]  J. Máca,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of sugar beet pulp. , 2012 .

[23]  M. Barjenbruch,et al.  Enzymatic, mechanical and thermal pre-treatment of surplus sludge , 2003 .

[24]  K. Buchholz,et al.  Continuous anaerobic conversion of sugar beet pulp to biogas , 1985, Biotechnology Letters.

[25]  Xavier Font,et al.  Long term operation of a thermophilic anaerobic reactor: process stability and efficiency at decreasing sludge retention time. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[26]  Sonia Heaven,et al.  Trace element requirements for stable food waste digestion at elevated ammonia concentrations. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[27]  P. He,et al.  Effect of proteins, polysaccharides, and particle sizes on sludge dewaterability. , 2009, Journal of environmental sciences.

[28]  Sonia Heaven,et al.  Potential errors in the quantitative evaluation of biogas production in anaerobic digestion processes. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[29]  Awwa,et al.  Standard Methods for the examination of water and wastewater , 1999 .

[30]  G. Moen.  Anaerobic digester foaming: Causes and solutions , 2002 .

[31]  F. Colin,et al.  Distribution of water in sludges in relation to their mechanical dewatering , 1995 .

[32]  Sean Tyrrel,et al.  The effect of organic loading rate on foam initiation during mesophilic anaerobic digestion of municipal wastewater sludge. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[33]  S. Harcum,et al.  Xanthan gum production from waste sugar beet pulp , 1999 .

[34]  N. Vassilev,et al.  Fermentation of sugar beet waste by Aspergillus niger facilitates growth and P uptake of external mycelium of mixed populations of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi , 2007 .

[35]  Richard E Speece,et al.  Anaerobic biotechnology and odor/corrosion control for municipalities and industries , 2007 .