The Care Work of Access

Current approaches to AI and Assistive Technology (AT) often foreground task completion over other encounters such as expressions of care. Our paper challenges and complements such task-completion approaches by attending to the care work of access-the continual affective and emotional adjustments that people make by noticing and attending to one another. We explore how this work impacts encounters among people with and without vision impairments who complete tasks together. We find that bound up in attempts to get things done are concerns for one another and how well people are doing together. Reading this work through emerging disability studies and feminist STS scholarship, we account for two important forms of work that give rise to access: (1) mundane attunements and (2) non-innocent authorizations. Together these processes work as sensitizing concepts to help HCI scholars account for the ways that intelligent ATs both produce access while sometimes subverting people with disabilities.

[1]  Os Keyes,et al.  The Misgendering Machines , 2018, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[2]  Yunan Chen,et al.  Senior Care for Aging in Place: Balancing Assistance and Independence , 2017, CSCW.

[3]  D. Goodley Dis/ability Studies: Theorising disablism and ableism , 2014 .

[4]  David Nemer,et al.  Sociotechnical Systems of Care , 2018, CSCW Companion.

[5]  John Law,et al.  Good Passages, Bad Passages , 1999 .

[6]  Ellen W. Zegura,et al.  Care and the Practice of Data Science for Social Good , 2018, COMPASS.

[7]  Steven J. Jackson,et al.  Caring for the "next billion" mobile handsets: opening proprietary closures through the work of repair , 2016, ICTD.

[8]  G ZHA,et al.  The Effect of Computer-Generated Descriptions on Photo-Sharing Experiences of People With Visual Impairments , 2017 .

[9]  Jon Hindmarsh,et al.  Workplace Studies: Exploring the workplace , 2000 .

[10]  Amy Hurst,et al.  Embracing Errors: Examining How Context of Use Impacts Blind Individuals' Acceptance of Navigation Aid Errors , 2017, CHI.

[11]  Walter S. Lasecki,et al.  RegionSpeak: Quick Comprehensive Spatial Descriptions of Complex Images for Blind Users , 2015, CHI.

[12]  Chieko Asakawa,et al.  People with Visual Impairment Training Personal Object Recognizers: Feasibility and Challenges , 2017, CHI.

[13]  Amy Hurst,et al.  "just let the cane hit it": how the blind and sighted see navigation differently , 2014, ASSETS.

[14]  Alison Kafer,et al.  Feminist, Queer, Crip , 2013 .

[15]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  Workshop on AI fairness for people with disabilities , 2020, ACM SIGACCESS Access. Comput..

[16]  Åsa Ståhl,et al.  Becoming response-able stakeholders: participatory design in times of uncertainties , 2016, PDC.

[17]  Daniela Karin Rosner,et al.  Values in Repair , 2016, CHI.

[18]  Yuhang Zhao,et al.  CueSee: exploring visual cues for people with low vision to facilitate a visual search task , 2016, UbiComp.

[19]  Maria Puig De La Bellacasa,et al.  ‘Nothing Comes Without Its World’: Thinking with Care , 2012 .

[20]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[21]  Erin Brady,et al.  Interdependence as a Frame for Assistive Technology Research and Design , 2018, ASSETS.

[22]  Daniela Karin Rosner,et al.  Biographical Prototypes: Reimagining Recognition and Disability in Design , 2019, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[23]  Daniela Karin Rosner,et al.  Making Core Memory: Design Inquiry into Gendered Legacies of Engineering and Craftwork , 2018, CHI.

[24]  E. Schegloff,et al.  Opening up Closings , 1973 .

[25]  Vinciane Despret The Body We Care for: Figures of Anthropo-zoo-genesis , 2004 .

[26]  Shari Trewin,et al.  AI Fairness for People with Disabilities: Point of View , 2018, ArXiv.

[27]  Steven J. Jackson,et al.  Logistics as Care and Control: An Investigation into the UNICEF Supply Division , 2016, CHI.

[28]  Rob Miller,et al.  VizWiz: nearly real-time answers to visual questions , 2010, UIST.

[29]  Geraldine Fitzpatrick,et al.  Self-Care Technologies in HCI: Trends, Tensions, and Opportunities , 2015, TCHI.

[30]  C. Kelly Making ‘care’ accessible: Personal assistance for disabled people and the politics of language , 2011 .

[31]  Halley Profita,et al.  The AT Effect: How Disability Affects the Perceived Social Acceptability of Head-Mounted Display Use , 2016, CHI.

[32]  Ingunn Moser,et al.  Dementia and the Limits to Life: Anthropological Sensibilities, STS Interferences, and Possibilities for Action in Care , 2011 .

[33]  Trewinshari,et al.  Workshop on AI fairness for people with disabilities , 2020 .

[34]  Laura Mauldin A Feminist Technoscientific Approach to Disability and Caregiving in the Family , 2017 .

[35]  Rebecca Fiebrink,et al.  Machine Learning as Meta-Instrument: Human-Machine Partnerships Shaping Expressive Instrumental Creation , 2017 .

[36]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  Human-Centred Machine Learning , 2016, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[37]  Naveena Karusala,et al.  Care as a Resource in Underserved Learning Environments , 2017, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[38]  Tanya Titchkosky,et al.  The Question of Access: Disability, Space, Meaning , 2011 .

[39]  Shaun W. Lawson,et al.  Connecting Those That Care: Designing for Transitioning, Talking, Belonging and Escaping , 2017, CHI.

[40]  Silvia Lindtner,et al.  Caring through Data: Attending to the Social and Emotional Experiences of Health Datafication , 2017, CSCW.

[41]  Edward H. Wagner,et al.  How Values Shape Collaboration Between Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions and Spousal Caregivers , 2017, CHI.

[42]  K. Fritsch INTIMATE ASSEMBLAGES: DISABILITY, INTERCORPOREALITY, AND THE LABOUR OF ATTENDANT CARE , 2010 .

[43]  Alise de Bie,et al.  Care work: dreaming disability justice , 2019, Disability & Society.

[44]  Geraldine Fitzpatrick,et al.  Understanding the Mundane Nature of Self-care: Ethnographic Accounts of People Living with Parkinson's , 2018, CHI.

[45]  J. Middleton,et al.  Interdependent temporalities and the everyday mobilities of visually impaired young people , 2019, Geoforum.

[46]  María Puig de la Bellacasa Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things , 2011, Social studies of science.

[47]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  Understanding Blind People's Experiences with Computer-Generated Captions of Social Media Images , 2017, CHI.

[48]  Aimi Hamraie,et al.  Crip Technoscience Manifesto , 2019, Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience.

[49]  Shaomei Wu,et al.  Automatic Alt-text: Computer-generated Image Descriptions for Blind Users on a Social Network Service , 2017, CSCW.

[50]  Rebecca Fiebrink Real-time interaction with supervised learning , 2010, CHI EA '10.

[51]  Daniela Karin Rosner,et al.  Designing with Waste: A Situated Inquiry into the Material Excess of Making , 2019, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[52]  Annuska Zolyomi,et al.  Technology-Mediated Sight: A Case Study of Early Adopters of a Low Vision Assistive Technology , 2017, ASSETS.

[53]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  The Proper Care and Feeding of Hackerspaces: Care Ethics and Cultures of Making , 2015, CHI.

[54]  Kyungjun Lee,et al.  Revisiting Blind Photography in the Context of Teachable Object Recognizers , 2019, ASSETS.

[55]  Vinciane Despret,et al.  FROM SECRET AGENTS TO INTERAGENCY , 2013 .

[56]  Jon Hindmarsh,et al.  Workplace Studies: List of contributors , 2000 .

[57]  O WobbrockJacob,et al.  Self-Conscious or Self-Confident? A Diary Study Conceptualizing the Social Accessibility of Assistive Technology , 2016 .

[58]  Jacob O. Wobbrock,et al.  In the shadow of misperception: assistive technology use and social interactions , 2011, CHI.

[59]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Third-wave HCI, 10 years later---participation and sharing , 2015, Interactions.

[60]  C. Goodwin,et al.  Producing Sense with Nonsense Syllables: Turn and Sequence in Conversations with a Man with Severe Aphasia* , 2020 .

[61]  Shaun K. Kane,et al.  Collaborative Accessibility: How Blind and Sighted Companions Co-Create Accessible Home Spaces , 2015, CHI.

[62]  Alex S. Taylor,et al.  Let's Talk About Race: Identity, Chatbots, and AI , 2018, CHI.

[63]  Charles Goodwin,et al.  A Competent Speaker Who Can't Speak: The Social Life of Aphasia , 2004 .

[64]  Anja Thieme,et al.  Automated Person Detection in Dynamic Scenes to Assist People with Vision Impairments: An Initial Investigation , 2018, ASSETS.

[65]  Apu Kapadia,et al.  Up to a Limit? , 2018, Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol..

[66]  Christine Kelly,et al.  Building Bridges with Accessible Care: Disability Studies, Feminist Care Scholarship, and Beyond , 2013, Hypatia.

[67]  A. Hoffmann Where fairness fails: data, algorithms, and the limits of antidiscrimination discourse , 2019, Information, Communication & Society.

[68]  James Mcintyre Keywords for Radicals: The Contested Vocabulary of Late-Capitalist Struggle , 2017 .

[69]  Jentery Sayers,et al.  Prototyping the Past , 2015 .

[70]  Yuhang Zhao,et al.  A Face Recognition Application for People with Visual Impairments: Understanding Use Beyond the Lab , 2018, CHI.

[71]  Ingunn Moser ON BECOMING DISABLED AND ARTICULATING ALTERNATIVES , 2005 .

[72]  Yuhang Zhao,et al.  Finding a store, searching for a product: a study of daily challenges of low vision people , 2016, UbiComp.

[73]  Edward Cutrell,et al.  Imagining Artificial Intelligence Applications with People with Visual Disabilities using Tactile Ideation , 2017, ASSETS.

[74]  Lilly Irani,et al.  Ways of Knowing When Research Subjects Care , 2019, CHI.

[75]  Michelle Murphy,et al.  Unsettling care: Troubling transnational itineraries of care in feminist health practices , 2015, Social studies of science.

[76]  Shaun K. Kane,et al.  The Invisible Work of Accessibility: How Blind Employees Manage Accessibility in Mixed-Ability Workplaces , 2015, ASSETS.

[77]  Karen Ruhleder,et al.  Meaning-making across remote sites: How delays in transmission affect interaction , 1999, ECSCW.

[78]  Alex S. Taylor,et al.  "I can do everything but see!" -- How People with Vision Impairments Negotiate their Abilities in Social Contexts , 2018, CHI.

[79]  Florian Nadel,et al.  Workplace Studies Recovering Work Practice And Informing System Design , 2016 .

[80]  Jed R. Brubaker,et al.  How Computers See Gender: An Evaluation of Gender Classification in Commercial Facial Analysis and Image Labeling Services , 2019 .

[81]  Juan E. Gilbert,et al.  Cyborg Perspectives on Computing Research Reform , 2019, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[82]  Eva Giraud,et al.  Care, Laboratory Beagles and Affective Utopia , 2016 .

[83]  Maria Puig De La Bellacasa,et al.  Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More than Human Worlds , 2017 .

[84]  Jeffrey P. Bigham,et al.  Real time object scanning using a mobile phone and cloud-based visual search engine , 2013, ASSETS.

[85]  C. Heath,et al.  Body movement and speech in medical interaction: Postscript: the use of medical records and computers during the consultation , 1986 .

[86]  Hannah L. Stevens,et al.  Building Access: Universal Design and the Politics of Disability , 2019, Technical Communication Quarterly.

[87]  Jeffrey P. Bigham,et al.  Supporting blind photography , 2011, ASSETS.

[88]  Marco Gillies,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue on Human-Centered Machine Learning , 2018, ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst..