Intergroup Competition and Attitudes Toward Immigrants and Immigration: An Instrumental Model of Group Conflict

High levels of worldwide migration paired with increasingly negative attitudes toward immigrants and immigration in host countries indicate that it is crucial to gain an understanding of the bases of these attitudes. This article discusses one determinant of negative attitudes toward immigrants and immigration: perceived competition for resources. We present our instrumental model of group conflict, which suggests that competition for resources, and attempts to remove this competition, are important determinants of intergroup attitudes and behavior. We then review relevant research on perceived competition and attitudes toward immigrants and immigration. We conclude by discussing the implications of this research for attempts to alleviate tension between immigrants and members of host populations, and for our more general model of group conflict.

[1]  T. Tyler,et al.  Justice and power: when will justice concerns encourage the advantaged to support policies which redistribute economic resources and the disadvantaged to willingly obey the law? , 1996 .

[2]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  Negative Interdependence and Prejudice: Whence the Affect? , 1993 .

[3]  V. Esses,et al.  Of Scripture and Ascription: The Relation between Religious Fundamentalism and Intergroup Helping , 1997 .

[4]  Joseph Schwarzwald,et al.  Prejudice toward Immigrants to Spain and Israel , 1998 .

[5]  Mary L. Dudziak.  Desegregation as a Cold War Imperative , 1988 .

[6]  M. Banaji,et al.  The role of stereotyping in system‐justification and the production of false consciousness , 1994 .

[7]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Cognitive and affective bases of attitudes toward social groups and social policies , 1994 .

[9]  L. Bobo,et al.  Perceptions of racial group competition: Extending Blumer's theory of group position to a multiracial social context , 1996 .

[10]  T. Espenshade,et al.  Contemporary American Attitudes toward U.S. Immigration 1 , 1996, The International migration review.

[11]  F. Pratto,et al.  CONSENSUAL SOCIAL DOMINANCE ORIENTATION AND ITS CORRELATES WITHIN THE HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURE OF AMERICAN SOCIETY , 1996 .

[12]  L. Bobo.  Attitudes toward the Black Political Movement: Trends, Meaning, and Effects on Racial Policy Preferences* , 1988 .

[13]  F. Pratto,et al.  Social Dominance Orientation and the Political Psychology of Gender: A Case of Invariance? , 1994 .

[14]  B. Zawadzki.  Limitations of the scapegoat theory of prejudice. , 1948, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[15]  Charles Stangor,et al.  Affective and cognitive determinants of prejudice , 1991 .

[16]  H. Blumer.  Race Prejudice as a Sense of Group Position , 1958 .

[17]  Jay W. Jackson,et al.  Realistic group conflict theory: A review and evaluation of the theoretical and empirical literature. , 1993 .

[18]  B. Malle,et al.  Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. , 1994 .

[19]  R. Ashmore,et al.  3 – Psychological Approaches to Understanding Intergroup Conflicts , 1976 .

[20]  L. Bobo.  Group Conflict, Prejudice, and the Paradox of Contemporary Racial Attitudes , 1988 .

[21]  D. Palmer.  Determinants of Canadian attitudes toward immigration: More than just racism? , 1996 .

[22]  Lincoln Quillian.  Prejudice as a response to perceived group threat: population composition and anti-immigrant and racial prejudice in Europe , 1995 .

[23]  Walter G. Stephan,et al.  Prejudice toward immigrants. , 1999 .

[24]  L. Bobo,et al.  Whites' opposition to busing: Symbolic racism or realistic group conflict? , 1983 .

[25]  F. Pratto,et al.  INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AND GROUP PROCESSES Racism, Conservatism, Affirmative Action, and Intellectual Sophistication: A Matter of Principled Conservatism or Group Dominance? , 1996 .

[26]  R. Fazio,et al.  Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: a bona fide pipeline? , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Assessing the structure of prejudicial attitudes: The case of attitudes toward homosexuals. , 1993 .

[28]  M. Brewer.  In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. , 1979 .

[29]  M. Chesler.  2 – Contemporary Sociological Theories of Racism * , 1976 .

[30]  P. Devine.  Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. , 1989 .

[31]  J. Dovidio,et al.  On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes , 1997 .