Barriers and challenges to global clinical cancer research.

BACKGROUND There are concerns about growing barriers to cancer research. We explored the characteristics of and barriers to global clinical cancer research. METHODS The American Society of Clinical Oncology International Affairs Committee invited 300 selected oncologists with research experience from 25 countries to complete a Web-based survey. Fisher's exact test was used to compare answers between participants from high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Barriers to clinical cancer research were ranked from 1 (most important) to 8 (least important). Mann-Whitney's nonparametric test was used to compare the ranks describing the importance of investigated obstacles. RESULTS Eighty oncologists responded, 41 from HICs and 39 from LMICs. Most responders were medical oncologists (62%) at academic hospitals (90%). Researchers from HICs were more involved with academic and industry-driven research than were researchers from LMICs. Significantly higher proportions of those who considered their ability to conduct academic research and industry-driven research over the past 5 years more difficult were from HICs (73% vs. 27% and 70% vs. 30%, respectively). Concerning academic clinical cancer research, a lack of funding was ranked the most important (score: 3.16) barrier, without significant differences observed between HICs and LMICs. Lack of time or competing priorities and procedures from competent authorities were the second most important barriers to conducting academic clinical research in HICs and LMICs, respectively. CONCLUSION Lack of funding, lack of time and competing priorities, and procedures from competent authorities might be the main global barriers to academic clinical cancer research.

[1]  L. Minasian,et al.  Achieving high cancer control trial enrollment in the community setting: an analysis of the Community Clinical Oncology Program. , 2013, Contemporary clinical trials.

[2]  M. Carducci,et al.  Removing barriers to participation in clinical trials, a conceptual framework and retrospective chart review study , 2012, Trials.

[3]  K. Steinhausen,et al.  Global core competencies for clinical trials , 2012, The Lancet.

[4]  M. Barton Physician characteristics associated with clinical trial enrollment , 2011, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[5]  I. Tannock,et al.  Global drug development in cancer: A cross-sectional study of clinical trial registries. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  E. Trimble,et al.  Improving cancer outcomes through international collaboration in academic cancer treatment trials. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  J. Adler Ethical and scientific implications of the globalization of clinical research. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  I. Tannock,et al.  The transition from phase II to phase III studies. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  I. Tannock,et al.  Evolution of the randomized controlled trial in oncology over three decades. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  Andrew D Oxman,et al.  Outcomes of patients who participate in randomized controlled trials compared to similar patients receiving similar interventions who do not participate. , 2008, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[11]  Franco Berrino,et al.  Survival for eight major cancers and all cancers combined for European adults diagnosed in 1995-99: results of the EUROCARE-4 study. , 2007, The Lancet. Oncology.

[12]  M. Piccart,et al.  Keeping faith with trial volunteers , 2007, Nature.

[13]  J. Boissel,et al.  Why don't cancer patients enter clinical trials? A review. , 2006, European journal of cancer.

[14]  Richard Sullivan,et al.  A Survey of Public Funding of Cancer Research in the European Union , 2006, PLoS medicine.

[15]  Sarah M. Greene,et al.  Organizational barriers to physician participation in cancer clinical trials. , 2005, The American journal of managed care.

[16]  A. du Bois,et al.  Pattern of care and impact of participation in clinical studies on the outcome in ovarian cancer , 2004, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[17]  M. Christian,et al.  How sociodemographics, presence of oncology specialists, and hospital cancer programs affect accrual to cancer treatment trials. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  D. Gandara,et al.  Prospective evaluation of cancer clinical trial accrual patterns: identifying potential barriers to enrollment. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  W. Bleyer The U.S. pediatric cancer clinical trials programmes: international implications and the way forward. , 1997, European journal of cancer.

[20]  R. Sullivan The good, the bad, and the ugly: effect of regulations on cancer research. , 2008, The Lancet. Oncology.

[21]  R. Sullivan,et al.  The impact of the 'Clinical Trials' directive on the cost and conduct of non-commercial cancer trials in the UK. , 2007, European journal of cancer.

[22]  R. Horton,et al.  Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. , 2004, The New Zealand medical journal.