The unbearable lightness of GOing: The projection parameter as a pure parameter governing the distribution of elliptic motion verbs in Germanic

It is a well-known fact that most of the Germanic languages can use modal verbs with non-verbal complements. In the present paper I will focus on modals with directional PPs such as the German Ich muss nach hause (I must home). There are two ways to analyze such constructions. Either we say that the modal can (also) be used as a main verb, in which case it can have a complete theta-structure, a full-blown subcategorization frame (e.g., Barbiers (1995)), or we say that, among the verbal complements the modal verb can combine with, there is a super-light motion verb [e]GO. Swiss German presents us with two incontrovertible arguments to the effect that there has to be an empty GO. The first, due to J. Hoekstra (1997), is based on the distribution of PPs in verbal clusters. A second argument comes from Verb Doubling. Dutch and German differ from Swiss German in this respect. It is tempting to assume that these languages lack the empty GO. However, West Flemish confronts us with a paradox: according to one argument it must have empty GO, according to the other argument it must lack it. The only way in which the paradox can be resolved, it is argued, is to assume that all varieties (there are relevant additional data from Afrikaans, Alsatian, German, Frisian, and Luxemburgish) have the phonetically empty super-light motion verb GO but that the variation is due to a 'Pure Parameter'. This parameter, the Projection Parameter, is argued to regulate the licensing of empty light motion verbs as well as the occurrence of Verb (Projection) Raising.

[1]  Elena Anagnostopoulou,et al.  Location and Locality , 2001 .

[2]  H. B. Drubig.  ON THE SYNTACTIC FORM OF EPISTEMIC MODALITY , 2001 .

[3]  Hilda Koopman,et al.  The syntax of verbs , 1984 .

[4]  C.J.W. Zwart,et al.  Verb Clusters in Continental West Germanic Dialects , 1996 .

[5]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Filters and Control , 1990 .

[6]  Werner Abraham,et al.  Modals: toward explaining the 'epistemic non-finiteness gap' , 2001 .

[7]  Richard S. Kayne.  The Antisymmetry of Syntax , 1994 .

[8]  H. V. Riemsdijk,et al.  Verb Projection Raising, Scope, and the Typology of Rules Affecting Verbs , 1986 .

[9]  Noam Chomsky.  Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding , 1982 .

[10]  Henk van Riemsdijk.  Head Movement and Adjacency , 1998 .

[11]  Robert C. Berwick,et al.  The acquisition of syntactic knowledge , 1985 .

[12]  H. V. Riemsdijk,et al.  Push Chains and Drag Chains : Complex Predicate Split in Dutch , 1997 .

[13]  Hendrikus Johannes Wilhelmus Maria Broekhuis,et al.  Chain-government : Issues in Dutch Syntax , 1992 .

[14]  H. V. Riemsdijk.  Categorial feature magnetism: The endocentricity and distribution of projections , 1998 .

[15]  Marga Reis,et al.  Bilden Modalverben im Deutschen eine syntaktische Klasse , 2001 .

[16]  Robert Fiengo,et al.  Surface Structure: The Interface of Autonomous Components , 1981 .

[17]  Erich Drach,et al.  Grundgedanken der deutschen Satzlehre , 1963 .

[18]  Z. Penner,et al.  Cross-Dialectal Variation in Swiss German: Doubling Verbs, Verb-Projection Raising, Barrierhood, and LF Movement , 1995 .

[19]  Peter Ackema,et al.  Determiner sharing as an instance of dependent ellipsis , 2002 .

[20]  M. C. Erb.  Finite Auxiliaries in German , 2001 .

[21]  Hans den Besten,et al.  On the Interaction of Root Transformations and Lexical Deletive Rules , 1983 .

[22]  Karen Zagona,et al.  Proper government of antecedentless VP in English and Spanish , 1988 .

[23]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[25]  Hans Broekhuis,et al.  Verb Projection Raising in het Nederlands , 1992 .

[26]  Richard Hudson,et al.  Arguments for a Non-Transformational Grammar , 1976 .

[27]  Henk C. van Riemsdijk,et al.  A case study in syntactic markedness: The binding nature of prepositional phrases , 1978 .

[28]  A. Lobeck.  Ellipsis: Functional Heads, Licensing, and Identification , 1995 .

[29]  Guido Vanden Wyngaerd,et al.  Pro-Legomena: Distribution and Reference of Infinitival Subjects , 1994 .

[30]  Marit Julien,et al.  Optional ha in Swedish and Norwegian , 2002 .

[31]  Pieter Muysken,et al.  Parametrizing the notion 'head' , 1982 .

[32]  Sharon Inkelas,et al.  Nimboran position class morphology , 1993 .

[33]  David Lightfoot,et al.  Principles of diachronic syntax , 1979 .

[34]  Katherine Cooper.  Topics in Zurich German syntax , 1994 .

[35]  L. Rizzi.  Null objects in Italian and the theory of 'pro' , 1986 .

[36]  Joseph E. Emonds,et al.  Lexicon and Grammar: The English Syntacticon , 2001 .

[37]  Norbert Corver,et al.  Semi-Lexical Categories : The Content of Function Words and the Function of Content Words , 2001 .

[38]  Paul Schachter.  Explaining Auxiliary Order , 1983 .

[39]  Richard S. Kayne.  Parameters and universals , 2000 .

[40]  W.J.M. Haeseryn.  Algemene Nederlandse spraakkunst , 1997 .

[41]  L.C.J. Barbiers.  The syntax of interpretation , 1995 .

[42]  J. Ross.  Auxiliaries as main verbs , 1969 .

[43]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  Issues in Italian Syntax , 1981 .

[44]  U. Engel.  Regeln zur "Satzgliedfolge" : zur Stellung der Elemente im einfachen Verbalsatz , 1972 .

[45]  Kai von Fintel,et al.  On the Interaction of Modals, Quantifiers, and If-Clauses , 2001 .

[46]  C. Platzack.  COMP, INFL, and Germanic Word Order , 1986 .