Static mixing spacers for spiral wound modules

Abstract Conventional spacers most commonly consist of a layered or woven fiber structure that creates fluid vortices or turbulence to mix the fluid in the flow channel. This mixing comes at the expense of increased pressure drop and associated pumping costs. A novel spacer design is evaluated that moves fluid uniquely within the flow channel. The spacer performs like a static mixer for planar flow channels. Fluid adjacent to the top and bottom boundaries of the flow channel is moved to the middle and replaced by fluid from the middle of the flow channel. Experimental measurements of spacer performance for filtration of dextran solutions are reported for the static mixing spacer and compared to a conventional spacer. The static mixing spacer offers comparable or better mass transfer performance at the same power input; at the lowest power inputs the mass transfer coefficient for the static mixing spacer was 20% higher.

[1]  A. Fane,et al.  The performance of ultrafiltration membranes pretreated by polymers , 1988 .

[2]  P. Schweitzer,et al.  Handbook of Separation Techniques for Chemical Engineers , 1997 .

[3]  Dianne E. Wiley,et al.  Spacer characterization and pressure drop modelling in spacer-filled channels for ultrafiltration☆ , 1994 .

[4]  Anthony G. Fane,et al.  Net-Type Spacers: Effect of Configuration on Fluid Flow Path and Ultrafiltration Flux , 1994 .

[5]  William G. Light,et al.  Improvement of Thin-Channel Design for Pressure-Driven Membrane Systems , 1981 .

[6]  S. V. Polyakov,et al.  Turbulence promoter geometry: its influence on salt rejection and pressure losses of a composite-membrane spiral would module , 1992 .

[7]  Matthias Wessling,et al.  Membrane with integrated spacer , 2010 .

[8]  G. Schock,et al.  Mass transfer and pressure loss in spiral wound modules , 1987 .

[9]  Satish Kumar,et al.  Predicting the effect of membrane spacers on mass transfer , 2008 .

[10]  S. G. Yiantsios,et al.  A numerical and experimental study of mass transfer in spacer-filled channels: Effects of spacer geometrical characteristics and Schmidt number , 2009 .

[11]  Eric M.V. Hoek,et al.  Modeling the impacts of feed spacer geometry on reverse osmosis and nanofiltration processes , 2009 .

[12]  N. Ibl,et al.  The use of eddy promoters for the enhancement of mass transport in electrolytic cells , 1980 .

[13]  Ronald F. Probstein,et al.  Turbulence Promotion and Hydrodynamic Optimization in an Ultrafiltration Process , 1979 .

[14]  A. B. de Haan,et al.  Novel spacers for mass transfer enhancement in membrane separations , 2005 .

[15]  Dianne E. Wiley,et al.  Novel spacer design improves observed flux , 2004 .

[16]  G. Owen,et al.  Economic assessment of membrane processes for water and waste water treatment , 1995 .

[17]  Matthias Wessling,et al.  Multi-layer spacer geometries with improved mass transport , 2006 .

[18]  Charles H. Gooding,et al.  MASS TRANSFER IN SPIRAL WOUND PERVAPORATION MODULES , 1994 .

[19]  Allan P. Colburn,et al.  Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop in Empty, Baffled, and Packed Tubes1 , 1931 .

[20]  Shyam S. Sablani,et al.  Concentration polarization in ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis: a critical review , 2001 .

[21]  S. Chang,et al.  8 Techniques to Enhance Performance of Membrane Processes , 2009 .

[22]  A. Kim,et al.  Prediction of permeate flux decline in crossflow membrane filtration of colloidal suspension: a radial basis function neural network approach , 2006 .

[23]  Abdul Latif Ahmad,et al.  Impact of different spacer filament geometries on concentration polarization control in narrow membrane channel , 2005 .

[24]  F. B. Leitz,et al.  Enhanced mass transfer in electrochemical cells using turbulence promoters , 1977 .

[25]  Abdul Latif Ahmad,et al.  Impact of different spacer filaments geometries on 2D unsteady hydrodynamics and concentration polarization in spiral wound membrane channel , 2006 .

[26]  J Schwinge,et al.  Characterization of a zigzag spacer for ultrafiltration , 2000 .

[27]  G. Trägårdh,et al.  Treatment of surface water rich in humus — Membrane filtration vs. conventional treatment☆ , 1997 .

[28]  Anthony G. Fane,et al.  Optimal channel spacer design for ultrafiltration , 1991 .

[29]  P. Flory.  Principles of polymer chemistry , 1953 .

[30]  W. L. Griffith,et al.  The role of turbulence promoters in hyperfiltration plant optimization , 1971 .

[31]  David F. Fletcher,et al.  Spiral wound modules and spacers - Review and analysis , 2004 .

[32]  C. A. Smolders,et al.  Hydrodynamic resistance of concentration polarization boundary layers in ultrafiltration , 1985 .

[33]  Dianne E. Wiley,et al.  Ultrafiltration of whey protein solutions in spacer-filled flat channels , 1993 .

[34]  A. B. de Haan,et al.  Optimization of commercial net spacers in spiral wound membrane modules , 2002 .

[35]  Vivek V. Ranade,et al.  Fluid dynamics of spacer filled rectangular and curvilinear channels , 2006 .

[36]  Dianne E. Wiley,et al.  Numerical study of two-dimensional multi-layer spacer designs for minimum drag and maximum mass transfer , 2008 .