Emergy evaluation of organic and conventional marine shrimp farms in Guaraíra Lagoon, Brazil

Organic products are often appreciated by the consumers as being more environmentally friendly and sustainable compared to their conventional counterparts. However, in the case of aquaculture, scientific information regarding environmental impacts and costs of conventional and organic farming systems is scarce. Scientific methods able to measure the sustainability of production systems are of great relevance to identify best management practices and ensure consumers the sustainability of the production process of aquaculture products. The objective of this study was to compare organic and conventional marine shrimp farms located in Guaraira Lagoon, Brazil, using emergy analysis. The principle of emergy analysis is to express all costs of a process or product in solar energy units (sej), making it possible to compare systems with different inputs, outputs and environmental impacts. Emergy accounting was used at this study to integrate ecological and human dimensions of conventional and organic marine shrimp farms systems located at Brazilian northeast in order to better discuss and understand the multiple dimensions of the sustainability in such systems. The results showed several emergy indicators in favor of organic farming system: the renewability indicator, the emergy yield ratio indicator and the emergy investment ratio indicator. Both systems (organic and conventional) showed large flows of concentrated non-renewable emergy. Further improvements of the organic system are needed to increase the efficiency and to ensure its economic sustainability.

[1]  Simone Bastianoni,et al.  Sustainability of poultry production using the emergy approach: Comparison of conventional and organic rearing systems , 2006 .

[2]  F. Páez‐Osuna The Environmental Impact of Shrimp Aquaculture: Causes, Effects, and Mitigating Alternatives , 2001, Environmental management.

[3]  P. J. Thompson,et al.  Nitrogen budget and effluent nitrogen components at an intensive shrimp farm , 2003 .

[4]  Michael F. Tlusty,et al.  Isolines as a new tool to assess the energy costs of the production and distribution of multiple sources of seafood , 2009 .

[5]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making , 1995 .

[6]  T. Xuân,et al.  Extensive shrimp farming, mangrove clearance and marine fisheries in the southern provinces of Vietnam , 1998 .

[7]  D. Teichert-Coddington,et al.  Partial nutrient budgets for semi-intensive shrimp farms in Honduras , 2000 .

[8]  L. D. Lacerda,et al.  Relative importance of nitrogen and phosphorus emissions from shrimp farming and other anthropogenic sources for six estuaries along the NE Brazilian coast , 2006 .

[9]  Simone Bastianoni,et al.  Emergy analysis for the environmental sustainability of an inshore fish farming system , 2007 .

[10]  H. Ngo,et al.  Effluent recycle and waste minimization in prawn farm effluent , 1999 .

[11]  A. Lem An Overview of Global Shrimp Markets and Trade1 , 2007 .

[12]  M. Flaherty,et al.  Marine shrimp aquaculture and natural resource degradation in Thailand , 1995 .

[13]  S. Bastianoni Use of Thermodynamic Orientors to Assess the Efficiency of Ecosystems: A Case Study in the Lagoon of Venice , 2002, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[14]  Enrique Ortega,et al.  Emergy assessment of integrated production systems of grains, pig and fish in small farms in the South Brazil , 2006 .

[15]  P. Leung,et al.  Sustainable aquaculture and producer performance: measurement of environmentally adjusted productivity and efficiency of a sample of shrimp farms in Mexico , 2004 .

[16]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Emergy Analysis and Environmental Accounting , 2004 .