Seismic performance assessment of base‐isolated safety‐related nuclear structures

SUMMARY Seismic or base isolation is a proven technology for reducing the effects of earthquake shaking on buildings, bridges and infrastructure. The benefit of base isolation has been presented in terms of reduced accelerations and drifts on superstructure components but never quantified in terms of either a percentage reduction in seismic loss (or percentage increase in safety) or the probability of an unacceptable performance. Herein, we quantify the benefits of base isolation in terms of increased safety (or smaller loss) by comparing the safety of a sample conventional and base-isolated nuclear power plant (NPP) located in the Eastern U.S. Scenario- and time-based assessments are performed using a new methodology. Three base isolation systems are considered, namely, (1) Friction Pendulum TM bearings, (2) lead–rubber bearings and (3) low-damping rubber bearings together with linear viscous dampers. Unacceptable performance is defined by the failure of key secondary systems because these systems represent much of the investment in a new build power plant and ensure the safe operation of the plant. For the scenario-based assessments, the probability of unacceptable performance is computed for an earthquake with a magnitude of 5.3 at a distance 7.5km from the plant. For the time-based assessments, the annual frequency of unacceptable performance is computed considering all potential earthquakes that may occur. For both assessments, the implementation of base isolation reduces the probability of unacceptable performance by approximately four orders of magnitude for the same NPP superstructure and secondary systems. The increase in NPP construction cost associated with the installation of seismic isolators can be offset by substantially reducing the required seismic strength of secondary components and systems and potentially eliminating the need to seismically qualify many secondary components and systems. Copyright q 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  James M. Kelly,et al.  An earthquake isolation system for steam generators in nuclear power plants , 1982 .

[2]  Farzad Naeim,et al.  Design of seismic isolated structures : from theory to practice , 1999 .

[3]  D. L. Bernreuter,et al.  Seismic Safety Margins Research Program Phase I Final Report-Overview , 1981 .

[4]  Ioannis V. Kalpakidis,et al.  Effects of Heating on the Behavior of Lead-Rubber Bearings. I: Theory , 2009 .

[5]  Michael C. Constantinou,et al.  Effects of Heating on the Behavior of Lead-Rubber Bearings. II: Verification of Theory , 2009 .

[6]  Jack P. Moehle,et al.  Seismic Performance Evaluation of Facilities: Methodology and Implementation , 2009 .

[7]  Sharon L. Wood,et al.  Shear Strength of Low-Rise Reinforced Concrete Walls , 1990 .

[8]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  Seismic demands on secondary systems in base‐isolated nuclear power plants , 2007 .

[9]  Goodarz Ahmadi,et al.  Seismic responses of secondary systems in base-isolated structures , 1992 .

[10]  George P. Mavroeidis,et al.  A Mathematical Representation of Near-Fault Ground Motions , 2003 .

[11]  Goodarz Ahmadi,et al.  An Experimental Study on the Seismic Response of Base-Isolated Secondary Systems , 2002 .

[12]  James M. Kelly,et al.  Seismic isolation for nuclear power plants: Technical and non-technical aspects in decision making , 1985 .

[13]  L. Reiter,et al.  Procedural and submittal guidance for the individual plant examination of external events (IPEEE) for severe accident vulnerabilities , 1991 .

[14]  Benedikt Halldorsson,et al.  Calibration of the Specific Barrier Model to Earthquakes of Different Tectonic Regions , 2005 .

[15]  Yin-Nan Huang,et al.  Performance assessment of conventional and base-isolated nuclear power plants for earthquake and blast loadings , 2008 .

[16]  K. Campbell.  PREDICTION OF STRONG GROUND MOTION USING THE HYBRID EMPIRICAL METHOD AND ITS USE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF GROUND-MOTION (ATTENUATION) RELATIONS IN EASTERN NORTH AMERICA , 2003 .

[17]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  Performance of Seismic Isolation Hardware under Service and Seismic Loading , 2007 .

[18]  M. K. Ravindra,et al.  Seismic fragilities for nuclear power plant risk studies , 1984 .

[19]  Amico.  An approach to the quantification of seismic margins in nuclear power plants: The importance of BWR plant systems and functions to seismic margins , 1985 .

[20]  Michael C. Constantinou,et al.  Property Modification Factors for Seismic Isolation Bearings , 1999 .

[21]  James M. Kelly,et al.  Seismic response of light internal equipment in base‐isolated structures , 1985 .