Parsimony analysis of phylogenomic datasets (I): scripts and guidelines for using TNT (Tree Analysis using New Technology)
暂无分享,去创建一个
Pablo A. Goloboff | Santiago A. Catalano | Ambrosio Torres | P. Goloboff | S. Catalano | Ambrosio Torres
[1] G. Giribet,et al. TNT: Tree Analysis Using New Technology , 2005 .
[2] J. Farris. Methods for Computing Wagner Trees , 1970 .
[3] Pablo A Goloboff,et al. A phylogenetic C interpreter for TNT , 2020, Bioinform..
[4] R. DeSalle,et al. Random Addition Concatenation Analysis: A Novel Approach to the Exploration of Phylogenomic Signal Reveals Strong Agreement between Core and Shell Genomic Partitions in the Cyanobacteria , 2011, Genome biology and evolution.
[5] J. Hein. Reconstructing evolution of sequences subject to recombination using parsimony. , 1990, Mathematical biosciences.
[6] Liang Liu,et al. Estimating species trees from unrooted gene trees. , 2011, Systematic biology.
[7] P. Goloboff,et al. Assessing topological congruence among concatenation-based phylogenomic approaches in empirical datasets. , 2021, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[8] J. Farris,et al. PARSIMONY JACKKNIFING OUTPERFORMS NEIGHBOR‐JOINING , 1996, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[9] David Hinkley,et al. Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife , 2008 .
[10] Bonnie B. Blaimer,et al. Ultra-Conserved Elements and morphology reciprocally illuminate conflicting phylogenetic hypotheses in Chalcididae (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea) , 2019, bioRxiv.
[11] Joseph Felsenstein,et al. Maximum Likelihood and Minimum-Steps Methods for Estimating Evolutionary Trees from Data on Discrete Characters , 1973 .
[12] P. Goloboff,et al. Morphological Data Sets Fit a Common Mechanism Much More Poorly than DNA Sequences and Call Into Question the Mkv Model , 2018, Systematic biology.
[13] Sudhindra R Gadagkar,et al. Inferring species phylogenies from multiple genes: concatenated sequence tree versus consensus gene tree. , 2005, Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution.
[14] K. Bremer,et al. BRANCH SUPPORT AND TREE STABILITY , 1994 .
[15] P. Goloboff,et al. Continuous characters analyzed as such , 2006, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[16] P. Goloboff,et al. Phylogenetic morphometrics (I): the use of landmark data in a phylogenetic framework , 2010, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[17] Matthew W. Hahn,et al. Why Concatenation Fails Near the Anomaly Zone , 2018, Systematic biology.
[18] M. Siddall. Unringing a bell: metazoan phylogenomics and the partition bootstrap , 2009, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[19] J. Farris. A Successive Approximations Approach to Character Weighting , 1969 .
[20] D. Soltis,et al. Amborella not a "basal angiosperm"? Not so fast. , 2004, American journal of botany.
[21] Alexey M. Kozlov,et al. ExaML version 3: a tool for phylogenomic analyses on supercomputers , 2015, Bioinform..
[22] J. Bergsten. A review of long‐branch attraction , 2005, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[23] Tandy J. Warnow,et al. ASTRAL: genome-scale coalescent-based species tree estimation , 2014, Bioinform..
[24] Mark P. Simmons,et al. Misleading results of likelihood‐based phylogenetic analyses in the presence of missing data , 2012, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[25] P. Goloboff. ESTIMATING CHARACTER WEIGHTS DURING TREE SEARCH , 1993, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[26] Luo Shunlong,et al. Probability distribution of , 1997 .
[27] Andrew V. Z. Brower,et al. Do model‐based phylogenetic analyses perform better than parsimony? A test with empirical data , 2011, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[28] Pablo A. Goloboff,et al. Minority rule supertrees? MRP, Compatibility, and Minimum Flip may display the least frequent groups , 2005 .
[29] Dan Liang,et al. Phylogenomic Resolution of the Phylogeny of Laurasiatherian Mammals: Exploring Phylogenetic Signals within Coding and Noncoding Sequences , 2017, Genome biology and evolution.
[30] M J Sanderson,et al. Parametric phylogenetics? , 2000, Systematic biology.
[31] B. Rannala,et al. Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: A new method of phylogenetic inference , 1996, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[32] J. Felsenstein. CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[33] J. Farris,et al. Quantitative Phyletics and the Evolution of Anurans , 1969 .
[34] K. Nixon. The Parsimony Ratchet, a New Method for Rapid Parsimony Analysis , 1999 .
[35] P. Goloboff,et al. Weighted parsimony outperforms other methods of phylogenetic inference under models appropriate for morphology , 2018, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[36] A. Polanowski,et al. A phylogenomic analysis of the role and timing of molecular adaptation in the aquatic transition of cetartiodactyl mammals , 2015, Royal Society Open Science.
[37] J. Felsenstein. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[38] Ultra‐Conserved Elements and morphology reciprocally illuminate conflicting phylogenetic hypotheses in Chalcididae (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea) , 2020, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[39] V. Goremykin,et al. Analysis of the Amborella trichopoda chloroplast genome sequence suggests that amborella is not a basal angiosperm. , 2003, Molecular biology and evolution.
[40] B. Rannala,et al. Molecular phylogenetics: principles and practice , 2012, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[41] M. Newton,et al. Phylogenetic Inference for Binary Data on Dendograms Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo , 1997 .
[42] R. Meier,et al. Software Review , 2005 .
[43] D. Robinson,et al. Comparison of phylogenetic trees , 1981 .
[44] P. Goloboff. Self‐Weighted Optimization: Tree Searches and Character State Reconstructions under Implied Transformation Costs , 1997 .
[45] Pablo A. Goloboff,et al. Self-Weighted Optimization: Tree Searches and Character State Reconstructions under Implied Transformation Costs , 1997 .
[46] Seán G. Brady,et al. Phylogenomic Insights into the Evolution of Stinging Wasps and the Origins of Ants and Bees , 2017, Current Biology.
[47] Ernest K. Lee,et al. Extracting phylogenetic signal and accounting for bias in whole-genome data sets supports the Ctenophora as sister to remaining Metazoa , 2015, BMC Genomics.
[48] P. Goloboff. Extended implied weighting , 2014, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[49] Alexandros Stamatakis,et al. Novel information theory-based measures for quantifying incongruence among phylogenetic trees. , 2014, Molecular biology and evolution.
[50] A. von Haeseler,et al. MPBoot: fast phylogenetic maximum parsimony tree inference and bootstrap approximation , 2018, BMC Evolutionary Biology.
[51] Bengt Oxelman,et al. Improvements to resampling measures of group support , 2003 .
[52] Karen Meusemann,et al. Phylogenomic analysis of Calyptratae: resolving the phylogenetic relationships within a major radiation of Diptera , 2019, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[53] P. Goloboff. Analyzing Large Data Sets in Reasonable Times: Solutions for Composite Optima , 1999, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[54] Pablo A. Goloboff,et al. GB‐to‐TNT: facilitating creation of matrices from GenBank and diagnosis of results in TNT , 2012, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[55] P. Goloboff,et al. Weighting against homoplasy improves phylogenetic analysis of morphological data sets , 2008 .
[56] Jeffrey P. Townsend,et al. A comprehensive phylogeny of birds (Aves) using targeted next-generation DNA sequencing , 2016, Nature.
[57] J. Doyle. The Irrelevance of Allele Tree Topologies for Species Delimitation, and a Non-Topological Alternative , 1995 .
[58] Tandy J. Warnow,et al. Rec-I-DCM3: A Fast Algorithmic Technique for Reconstructing Large Phylogenetic Trees , 2004, IEEE Computer Society Computational Systems Bioinformatics Conference.
[59] Minh Anh Nguyen,et al. Ultrafast Approximation for Phylogenetic Bootstrap , 2013, Molecular biology and evolution.
[60] A. Drummond,et al. Bayesian Inference of Species Trees from Multilocus Data , 2009, Molecular biology and evolution.
[61] J. Farris. ESTIMATION OF CONSERVATISM OF CHARACTERS BY CONSTANCY WITHIN BIOLOGICAL POPULATIONS , 1966, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[62] Frederick A Matsen,et al. 19 dubious ways to compute the marginal likelihood of a phylogenetic tree topology. , 2018, Systematic biology.
[63] Ming-Yang Kao,et al. Phylogeny Reconstruction , 2008, Encyclopedia of Algorithms.
[64] M. Braun,et al. Why Do Phylogenomic Data Sets Yield Conflicting Trees? Data Type Influences the Avian Tree of Life more than Taxon Sampling , 2017, Systematic biology.
[65] David Sankoff,et al. Locating the vertices of a steiner tree in an arbitrary metric space , 1975, Math. Program..
[66] P. Goloboff,et al. TNT version 1.5, including a full implementation of phylogenetic morphometrics , 2016, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[67] Pablo A. Goloboff,et al. Parsimony analysis of phylogenomic datasets (II): evaluation of PAUP*, MEGA and MPBoot , 2021, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[68] P. Goloboff,et al. Identifying unstable taxa: Efficient implementation of triplet-based measures of stability, and comparison with Phyutility and RogueNaRok. , 2015, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[69] Scott V. Edwards,et al. Phylogenomic subsampling: a brief review , 2016 .
[70] Nathan A. Johnson,et al. Comparative phylogenomics reveal complex evolution of life history strategies in a clade of bivalves with parasitic larvae (Bivalvia: Unionoida: Ambleminae) , 2020, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[71] Mark P. Simmons,et al. A confounding effect of missing data on character conflict in maximum likelihood and Bayesian MCMC phylogenetic analyses. , 2014, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[72] Pablo A. Goloboff,et al. TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis , 2008 .
[73] J. Farris. On Comparing the Shapes of Taxonomic Trees , 1973 .
[74] D. Maddison,et al. NEXUS: an extensible file format for systematic information. , 1997, Systematic biology.
[75] Tamir Tuller,et al. Maximum likelihood of evolutionary trees: hardness and approximation , 2005, ISMB.
[76] G. Giribet,et al. Exploring Phylogenetic Relationships within Myriapoda and the Effects of Matrix Composition and Occupancy on Phylogenomic Reconstruction , 2016, Systematic biology.
[77] M. P. Cummings,et al. PAUP* Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods) Version 4 , 2000 .
[78] P. Goloboff,et al. Likelihood approximations of implied weights parsimony can be selected over the Mk model by the Akaike information criterion , 2019, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[79] Pablo A. Goloboff,et al. Calculating SPR distances between trees , 2008, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[80] P. Goloboff. Oblong, a program to analyse phylogenomic data sets with millions of characters, requiring negligible amounts of RAM , 2014, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[81] A. Young,et al. Phylogenomics — principles, opportunities and pitfalls of big‐data phylogenetics , 2019, Systematic Entomology.
[82] J. Townsend,et al. A comprehensive phylogeny of birds (Aves) using targeted next-generation DNA sequencing , 2015, Nature.
[83] T. O’hara,et al. Restructuring higher taxonomy using broad-scale phylogenomics: The living Ophiuroidea. , 2017, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[84] W. Fitch. Toward Defining the Course of Evolution: Minimum Change for a Specific Tree Topology , 1971 .
[85] Q. Dai,et al. Using Genes as Characters and a Parsimony Analysis to Explore the Phylogenetic Position of Turtles , 2013, PloS one.
[86] N. Rosenberg,et al. Discordance of Species Trees with Their Most Likely Gene Trees , 2006, PLoS genetics.
[87] Bryan Kolaczkowski,et al. Performance of maximum parsimony and likelihood phylogenetics when evolution is heterogeneous , 2004, Nature.
[88] R. Hudson. Gene genealogies and the coalescent process. , 1990 .
[89] J. Felsenstein. Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods will be Positively Misleading , 1978 .
[90] D. Lipman,et al. Rapid and sensitive protein similarity searches. , 1985, Science.