The Effect of Significant Other's Job Complexity on Employee Reactions to Work

This research examines the interaction of individual employee job complexity with the job complexity of significant others in determining employee reactions to work. Procedures and hypotheses are based on principles of equity theory. For each employee, a composite significant other's job complexity index was formed by averaging the job complexity scores of all individuals within the focal employee'sjob classification who were of the same sex as the focal. Results show significant interactions between this "comparison other"job complexity measure and the job complexity of the focal employee. Specifically, results show that employees who work on jobs of greater complexity than their colleagues have lower satisfaction and higher productivity than employees who work on jobs comparable in complexity to those of comparison others. Employees who work on jobs of lesser complexity than their co-workers have slightly lower satisfaction and productivity than employees who work on jobs comparable in complexity to those of comparison others. Implications of these results for the practice of work redesign are discussed.

[1]  Randall B. Dunham,et al.  Reactions to Job Characteristics: Moderating Effects of the Organization , 1977 .

[2]  E. A. Locke,et al.  An Experimental Case Study of the Successes and Failures of Job Enrichment in a Government Agency , 1976 .

[3]  Richard,et al.  Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory. , 1976 .

[4]  Albert B. Cherns,et al.  The Principles of Sociotechnical Design , 1976 .

[5]  Randall B. Dunham,et al.  The measurement and dimensionality of job characteristics. , 1976 .

[6]  J. Hackman,et al.  Conditions under which employees respond positively to enriched work , 1976 .

[7]  T. Mitchell,et al.  Effects of Job Enrichment and Task Goals on Satisfaction and Productivity: Implications for Job Design , 1976 .

[8]  Greg R. Oldham,et al.  Job Characteristics and Internal Motivation: The Moderating Effect of Interpersonal and Individual Variables , 1976 .

[9]  L. L. Frank,et al.  A Failure of Job Enrichment: The Case of the Change That Wasn't , 1975 .

[10]  E. Walster,et al.  REACTIONS TO CONFIRMATIONS AND DISCONFIRMATIONS OF EXPECTANCIES OF EQUITY AND INEQUITY , 1974 .

[11]  J. Hackman,et al.  The Job Diagnostic Survey: An Instrument for the Diagnosis of Jobs and the Evaluation of Job Redesign Projects , 1974 .

[12]  W. Samuel.  On clarifying some interpretations of social comparison theory , 1973 .

[13]  J. Hackman,et al.  Effects of Job Redesign: A Field Experiment1 , 1973 .

[14]  Edward E. Lawler,et al.  Pay and organizational effectiveness : a psychological view , 1972 .

[15]  Robert D. Pritchard,et al.  Effects of perceptions of equity and inequity on worker performance and satisfaction. , 1972 .

[16]  J. Hackman,et al.  Employee reactions to job characteristics. , 1971 .

[17]  R. C. Bishop,et al.  Effects of job enlargement and job change on contiguous but nonmanipulated jobs as a function of workers' status. , 1971 .

[18]  R. N. Ford,et al.  Motivation Through the Work Itself. , 1970 .

[19]  Robert D. Pritchard,et al.  Equity theory: A review and critique. , 1969 .

[20]  K. Robertson,et al.  Job enrichment pays off. , 1969 .

[21]  E. Aronson,et al.  Self-evaluation vs. direct anxiety reduction as determinants of the fear-affiliation relationship , 1966 .

[22]  Adams Js.  Towards an understanding of inequity , 1963 .

[23]  J. S. Adams,et al.  The relationship of worker productivity to cognitive dissonance about wage inequities. , 1962 .

[24]  M. Patchen.  The Effect of Reference Group Standards on Job Satisfactions , 1958 .

[25]  J. Hackman,et al.  Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey , 1975 .

[26]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Evaluating a sex-related ability: Social comparison with similar others and standard setters , 1975 .

[27]  J. S. Adams,et al.  Inequity In Social Exchange , 1965 .