A concise review of optical, physical and isotropic fractionator techniques in neuroscience studies, including recent developments

Stereology is a collection of methods which makes it possible to produce interpretations about actual three-dimensional features of objects based on data obtained from their two-dimensional sections or images. Quantitative morphological studies of the central nervous system have undergone significant development. In particular, new approaches known as design-based methods have been successfully applied to neuromorphological research. The morphology of macroscopic and microscopic structures, numbers of cells in organs and structures, and geometrical features such as length, volume, surface area and volume components of the organ concerned can be estimated in an unbiased manner using stereological techniques. The most practical and simplest stereological method is the fractionator technique, one of the most widely used methods for total particle number estimation. This review summarizes fractionator methods in theory and in practice. The most important feature of the methods is the simplicity of its application and underlying reasoning. Although there are three different types of the fractionator method, physical, optical and isotropic (biochemical), the logic underlying its applications remains the same. The fractionator method is one of the strongest and best options among available methods for estimation of the total number of cells in a given structure or organ. The second part of this review focuses on recent developments in stereology, including how to deal with lost caps, with tissue section deformation and shrinkage, and discusses issues of calibration, particle identification, and the role of stereology in the era of a non-histological alternative to counting of cells, the isotropic fractionator (brain soup technique).

[1]  R. Coggeshall,et al.  Verification of the disector method for counting neurons, with comments on the empirical method , 1991, The Anatomical record.

[2]  P. R. Hof,et al.  Design-based stereology in neuroscience , 2005, Neuroscience.

[3]  Robert W. Williams,et al.  Counting Cells in Sectioned Material: A Suite of Techniques, Tools, and Tips , 2003, Current protocols in neuroscience.

[4]  B. Pakkenberg,et al.  Neocortical neuron number in humans: Effect of sex and age , 1997, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[5]  Lise Lyck,et al.  Immunohistochemical Markers for Quantitative Studies of Neurons and Glia in Human Neocortex , 2008, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[6]  Süleyman Kaplan,et al.  An Unbiased Way to Estimate Total Quantities: The Fractionator Technique , 2011 .

[7]  H. J. G. Gundersen,et al.  The new stereological tools: Disector, fractionator, nucleator and point sampled intercepts and their use in pathological research and diagnosis , 1988, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.

[8]  Jeffrey H Kordower Making the counts count: the stereology revolution , 2000, Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy.

[9]  R. W. Guillery On counting and counting errors , 2002, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[10]  H. Gundersen,et al.  Estimate of the total number of neurons and glial and endothelial cells in the rat spinal cord by means of the optical disector , 1993, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[11]  M. Turgut,et al.  Effect of pinealectomy on the morphology of the chick cervical spinal cord: A stereological and histopathological study , 2007, Brain Research.

[12]  L. Cruz-Orive Toward a more objective biology , 1994, Neurobiology of Aging.

[13]  C. V. von Bartheld,et al.  Development of the mesencephalic nucleus of the trigeminal nerve in chick embryos: Target innervation, neurotrophin receptors, and cell death , 1993, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[14]  Paul B Farel,et al.  Trust, but verify: The necessity of empirical verification in quantitative neurobiology , 2002, The Anatomical record.

[15]  T M Mayhew,et al.  If you assume, you can make an ass out of u and me': a decade of the disector for stereological counting of particles in 3D space. , 1996, Journal of anatomy.

[16]  Mark J. West,et al.  Stereological methods for estimating the total number of neurons and synapses: issues of precision and bias , 1999, Trends in Neurosciences.

[17]  H. Gundersen,et al.  Unbiased stereological estimation of the number of neurons in the human hippocampus , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[18]  B. Pakkenberg,et al.  A quantitative study of the human cerebellum with unbiased stereological techniques , 1992, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[19]  M. West Introduction to stereology. , 2012, Cold Spring Harbor protocols.

[20]  D. Bonthius,et al.  Use of frozen sections to determine neuronal number in the murine hippocampus and neocortex using the optical disector and optical fractionator. , 2004, Brain research. Brain research protocols.

[21]  S. Herculano‐Houzel,et al.  The search for true numbers of neurons and glial cells in the human brain: A review of 150 years of cell counting , 2016, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[22]  C. Schmitz Variation of fractionator estimates and its prediction , 1998, Anatomy and Embryology.

[23]  H. J. G. Gundersen,et al.  The impact of recent stereological advances on quantitative studies of the nervous system , 1986, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[24]  Bente Pakkenberg,et al.  Comparison of MR imaging against physical sectioning to estimate the volume of human cerebral compartments , 2003, NeuroImage.

[25]  C. Bartheld Myths and truths about the cellular composition of the human brain: A review of influential concepts , 2017, Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy.

[26]  W. Hatton,et al.  Analysis of cell death in the trochlear nucleus of the chick embryo: Calibration of the optical disector counting method reveals systematic bias , 1999, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[27]  Nicholas Lange,et al.  Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional cell counting: a practical perspective , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[28]  L M Cruz-Orive,et al.  Precision of Cavalieri sections and slices with local errors , 1999, Journal of microscopy.

[29]  Richard E. Coggeshall,et al.  A consideration of neural counting methods , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[30]  Gundersen,et al.  Pronounced loss of cell nuclei and anisotropic deformation of thick sections , 1999, Journal of microscopy.

[31]  J. Kaas,et al.  Three counting methods agree on cell and neuron number in chimpanzee primary visual cortex , 2014, Front. Neuroanat..

[32]  R. Oppenheim,et al.  Chapter 13 Neuron Death in Vertebrate Development: In Vivo Methods , 1995 .

[33]  D. C. Sterio The unbiased estimation of number and sizes of arbitrary particles using the disector , 1984, Journal of microscopy.

[34]  J. Bahney,et al.  Validation of the isotropic fractionator: Comparison with unbiased stereology and DNA extraction for quantification of glial cells , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[35]  E. Adigüzel,et al.  A histological study of toxic effects of aluminium sulfate on rat hippocampus , 2015, Biotechnic & histochemistry : official publication of the Biological Stain Commission.

[36]  H. Haug History of neuromorphometry , 1986, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[37]  A. Iwaniuk,et al.  Comparison of estimates of neuronal number obtained using the isotropic fractionator method and unbiased stereology in day old chicks (Gallus domesticus) , 2017, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[38]  C. Bartheld Distribution of Particles in the Z-axis of Tissue Sections: Relevance for Counting Methods , 2011 .

[39]  Rogely Waite Boyce,et al.  Design-based Stereology , 2010, Toxicologic pathology.

[40]  E. Fuchs,et al.  How to use the optical fractionator: an example based on the estimation of neurons in the hippocampal CA1 and CA3 regions of tree shrews. , 2001, Brain research. Brain research protocols.

[41]  H J Gundersen,et al.  The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology and its prediction * , 1987, Journal of microscopy.

[42]  H. Gundersen Stereology of arbitrary particles * , 1986, Journal of microscopy.

[43]  H. J. G. GUNDERSEN,et al.  Some new, simple and efficient stereological methods and their use in pathological research and diagnosis , 1988, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.

[44]  C V Howard,et al.  The total number of neurons in the human neocortex unbiasedly estimated using optical disectors , 1990, Journal of microscopy.

[45]  J. Hedreen Lost caps in histological counting methods , 1998, The Anatomical record.

[46]  J. Nyengaard,et al.  Comparison of Methods for Counting Cells in the Mouse Glomerulus , 2006, Nephron Experimental Nephrology.

[47]  Roberto Lent,et al.  Isotropic Fractionator: A Simple, Rapid Method for the Quantification of Total Cell and Neuron Numbers in the Brain , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[48]  H. Schmalbruch The number of neurons in dorsal root ganglia L4–L6 of the rat , 1987, The Anatomical record.

[49]  Richard E. Coggeshall,et al.  Calibration of methods for determining numbers of dorsal root ganglion cells , 1990, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[50]  C. S. von Bartheld,et al.  Counting particles in tissue sections: choices of methods and importance of calibration to minimize biases. , 2002 .

[51]  E M Glaser,et al.  The coefficient of error of optical fractionator population size estimates: a computer simulation comparing three estimators , 1998, Journal of microscopy.

[52]  H. Gümüş,et al.  Neuroprotective effects of melatonin and omega-3 on hippocampal cells prenatally exposed to 900 MHz electromagnetic fields , 2016, International journal of radiation biology.

[53]  C. Stevens,et al.  Analysis of differential shrinkage in frozen brain sections and its implications for the use of guard zones in stereology , 2011, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[54]  Christopher S von Bartheld,et al.  Differential tissue shrinkage and compression in the z-axis: implications for optical disector counting in vibratome-, plastic- and cryosections , 2003, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[55]  G. Rosen,et al.  Optical disector counting in cryosections and vibratome sections underestimates particle numbers: Effects of tissue quality , 2008, Microscopy research and technique.

[56]  H. Gundersen,et al.  Unbiased stereological estimation of the total number of neurons in the subdivisions of the rat hippocampus using the optical fractionator , 1991, The Anatomical record.

[57]  C. V. von Bartheld,et al.  The Cellular Composition and Glia–Neuron Ratio in the Spinal Cord of a Human and a Nonhuman Primate: Comparison With Other Species and Brain Regions , 2018, Anatomical record.

[58]  Jon H. Kaas,et al.  How to count cells: the advantages and disadvantages of the isotropic fractionator compared with stereology , 2015, Cell and Tissue Research.

[59]  R. Coggeshall,et al.  Methods for determining numbers of cells and synapses: A case for more uniform standards of review , 1996, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[60]  J R Nyengaard,et al.  Tissue shrinkage and unbiased stereological estimation of particle number and size * , 2001, Journal of microscopy.

[61]  S. Geuna,et al.  Calibration of the stereological estimation of the number of myelinated axons in the rat sciatic nerve: A multicenter study , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[62]  R W Guillery,et al.  Doubt and certainty in counting. , 2002, Progress in brain research.

[63]  Mehmet Emin Onger,et al.  A Brief Introduction to Stereology and Sampling Strategies: Basic Concepts of Stereology , 2011 .

[64]  M. Onger,et al.  Effects of diclofenac sodium on the hippocampus of rats with acute subdural hematoma: histological, stereological, and molecular approach. , 2016, Folia neuropathologica.

[65]  H. Gundersen,et al.  The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology — reconsidered , 1999, Journal of microscopy.

[66]  O. von Bohlen und Halbach,et al.  Two distinct events, section compression and loss of particles (“lost caps”), contribute to z‐axis distortion and bias in optical disector counting , 2006, Microscopy research and technique.

[67]  B. Pakkenberg,et al.  The Optical Fractionator Technique to Estimate Cell Numbers in a Rat Model of Electroconvulsive Therapy , 2017, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[68]  Patrick R Hof,et al.  Recommendations for straightforward and rigorous methods of counting neurons based on a computer simulation approach , 2000, Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy.

[69]  Thick Methacrylate Sections Devoid of Lost Caps Simplify Stereological Quantifications Based on the Optical Fractionator Design , 2015, Anatomical record.