Normal and impaired level encoding: Effects of noise-induced hearing loss on auditory-nerve responses

A major constraint for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) is the reduced acoustic dynamic range associated with loudness recruitment; however, the physiological correlates of loudness and recruitment are still not well understood. Recent psychophysical results challenge some of the classic concepts of recruitment (Buus and Florentine 2001), and suggest that the dynamic range of loudness is also reduced. These results have potentially significant implications for hearing aids that have renewed an interest in how SNHL affects level encoding in the auditory nerve (AN). The present study compares several AN response properties related to level encoding in normal-hearing cats and in cats with a noise-induced hearing loss.

[1]  Walt Jesteadt Modeling sensorineural hearing loss , 1997 .

[2]  M. Liberman,et al.  Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. III. Stereocilia damage and alterations of threshold tuning curves , 1984, Hearing Research.

[3]  David J. Anderson,et al.  Temporal Position of Discharges in Single Auditory Nerve Fibers within the Cycle of a Sine‐Wave Stimulus: Frequency and Intensity Effects , 1971 .

[4]  L. Robles,et al.  Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  D A Nelson,et al.  Intensity discrimination in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  R. P. Hamernik,et al.  Response patterns of auditory nerve fibers during temporary threshold shift , 1983, Hearing Research.

[7]  Mary Florentine,et al.  Growth of Loudness in Listeners with Cochlear Hearing Losses: Recruitment Reconsidered , 2002, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[8]  E D Young,et al.  Rate responses of auditory nerve fibers to tones in noise near masked threshold. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Laurel H. Carney,et al.  Spatiotemporal encoding of sound level: Models for normal encoding and recruitment of loudness , 1994, Hearing Research.

[10]  G. K. Yates,et al.  Basilar membrane nonlinearity and its influence on auditory nerve rate-intensity functions , 1990, Hearing Research.

[11]  R A Levine,et al.  Auditory-nerve activity in cats with normal and abnormal cochleas. In: Sensorineural hearing loss. , 1970, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[12]  R V Harrison,et al.  Rate-versus-intensity functions and related AP responses in normal and pathological guinea pig and human cochleas. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  J. Pickles An Introduction to the Physiology of Hearing , 1982 .

[14]  B C Moore,et al.  Further evaluation of a model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  J. O. Pickles,et al.  Auditory-nerve correlates of loudness summation with stimulus bandwidth, in normal and pathological cochleae , 1983, Hearing Research.

[16]  B. Moore,et al.  A revised model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss , 2004, Hearing Research.

[17]  J. E. Rose,et al.  Temporal position of discharges in single auditory nerve fibers within the cycle of a sine-wave stimulus: frequency and intensity effects. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  E M Relkin,et al.  Is loudness simply proportional to the auditory nerve spike count? , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  M G Heinz,et al.  Rate and timing cues associated with the cochlear amplifier: level discrimination based on monaural cross-frequency coincidence detection. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  L. Robles,et al.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. , 2001, Physiological reviews.

[21]  A. Oxenham,et al.  A behavioral measure of basilar-membrane nonlinearity in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  J S Reilly,et al.  Sensorineural hearing loss. , 1989, The Pediatric clinics of North America.

[23]  M. Sachs,et al.  Rate versus level functions for auditory-nerve fibers in cats: tone-burst stimuli. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  M. Liberman,et al.  Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. IV. Stereocilia damage and alterations in rate- and phase-level functions , 1984, Hearing Research.

[25]  B C Moore,et al.  Characterization and Simulation of Impaired Hearing: Implications for Hearing Aid Design , 1991, Ear and hearing.

[26]  E D Young,et al.  Effects of acoustic trauma on the representation of the vowel "eh" in cat auditory nerve fibers. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.