Linearity across spatial frequency in object recognition

In three experiments, we measured recognition as a function of exposure duration for three kinds of images of common objects: component images containing mainly low-spatial-frequency information, components containing mainly high-spatial-frequency information, and compound images created by summing the components. Our data were well fit by a model with a linear first stage in which the sums of the responses to the component images equalled the responses to the compound images. Our data were less well fit by a model in which the component responses combined by probability summation. These results support linear filter accounts of complex pattern recognition.

[1]  A. Watson.  Summation of grating patches indicates many types of detector at one retinal location , 1982, Vision Research.

[2]  C Blakemore,et al.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  L. Olzak.  Widely separated spatial frequencies: Mechanism interactions , 1986, Vision Research.

[4]  D. Navon.  Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  T A Busey,et al.  Providing a sensory basis for models of visual information acquisition , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  G. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—I. Normal vision , 1985, Vision Research.

[7]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Spatial vision. , 1971, Annual review of psychology.

[8]  G. Sperling,et al.  Object spatial frequencies, retinal spatial frequencies, noise, and the efficiency of letter discrimination , 1991, Vision Research.

[9]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[10]  T. Sanocki.  Time course of object identification: evidence for a global-to-local contingency. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  A. Watson.  Probability summation over time , 1979, Vision Research.

[12]  N. Graham.  Visual Pattern Analyzers , 1989 .

[13]  P. Reuter-Lorenz,et al.  Global Versus Local Processing in the Absence of Low Spatial Frequencies , 1990, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  Lynn A. Olzak,et al.  Cue summation in spatial discriminations , 1990, Vision Research.

[15]  J. Bergen,et al.  A four mechanism model for threshold spatial vision , 1979, Vision Research.

[16]  G R Loftus,et al.  A theory of visual information acquisition and visual memory with special application to intensity-duration trade-offs. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Human efficiency for recognizing and detecting low-pass filtered objects , 1995, Vision Research.

[18]  J. Robson,et al.  Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  A. Oliva,et al.  From Blobs to Boundary Edges: Evidence for Time- and Spatial-Scale-Dependent Scene Recognition , 1994 .

[20]  N. Graham,et al.  Detection of grating patterns containing two spatial frequencies: a comparison of single-channel and multiple-channels models. , 1971, Vision research.

[21]  G. Loftus,et al.  Sensory and cognitive components of visual information acquisition. , 1994, Psychological review.

[22]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  The visual filter mediating letter identification , 1994, Nature.