Structured Benefit–risk assessment: a review of key publications and initiatives on frameworks and methodologies

Introduction The conduct of structured benefit-risk assessment (BRA) of pharmaceutical products is a key area of interest for regulatory agencies and the pharmaceutical industry. However, the acceptance of a standardized approach and implementation are slow. Statisticians play major roles in these organizations, and have a great opportunity to be involved and drive the shaping of future BRA. Method We performed a literature search of recent reviews and initiatives assessing BRA methodologies, and grouped them to assist those new to BRA in learning, understanding, and choosing methodologies. We summarized the key points and discussed the impact of this emerging field on various stakeholders, particularly statisticians in the pharmaceutical industry. Results We provide introductory, essential, special interest, and further information and initiatives materials that direct readers to the most relevant materials, which were published between 2000 and 2013.  Based on recommendations in these materials we supply a toolkit of advocated BRA methodologies. Discussion Despite initiatives promoting these methodologies, there are still barriers, one of which being the lack of a consensus on the most appropriate methodologies among stakeholders. However, this opens up opportunities, for statisticians in the pharmaceutical industry especially, to champion appropriate BRA methodology use throughout the pharmaceutical product lifecycle. Conclusions This article may serve as a starting point for discussions and to reach a mutual consensus for methodology selection in a particular situation. Regulators and pharmaceutical industry should continue to collaborate to develop and take forward BRA methodologies, and by clear communication develop a mutual understanding of the key issues. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  L. Phillips,et al.  Review of visualisation methods for therepresentation of benefit-risk assessment ofmedication: stage 2 of 2 , 2013 .

[2]  Rebecca Noel,et al.  Application of the Benefit-Risk Action Team (BRAT) Framework in Pharmaceutical R&D: Results From a Pilot Program , 2012 .

[3]  Richard W. Marklin,et al.  Case Study Report , 2008, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[4]  Jixian Wang,et al.  A review of risk measures in pharmacoepidemiology with tips for statisticians in the pharmaceutical industry , 2011, Pharmaceutical statistics.

[5]  Shahrul Mt-Isa,et al.  IMI-PROTECT benefit-risk grouprecommendations report:recommendations for the methodology andvisualisation techniques to be used in theassessment of benefit and risk of medicines , 2014 .

[6]  R. Varadhan,et al.  A framework for organizing and selecting quantitative approaches for benefit-harm assessment , 2012, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[7]  S. Walker,et al.  Progress on the Development of a Benefit / Risk Framework for Evaluating Medicines , 2010 .

[8]  Allan Wailoo,et al.  Using health state utility values in models exploring the cost-effectiveness of health technologies. , 2012, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[9]  B S Levitan,et al.  Application of the BRAT Framework to Case Studies: Observations and Insights , 2011, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[10]  Constantine Gatsonis,et al.  The promise and realities of comparative effectiveness research , 2010, Statistics in medicine.

[11]  Lawrence D. Phillips,et al.  Evaluating benefit-risk: an Agency perspective , 2012 .

[12]  John Doyle,et al.  A review of quantitative risk-benefit methodologies for assessing drug safety and efficacy-report of the ISPOR risk-benefit management working group. , 2010, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[13]  B S Levitan,et al.  Development of a Framework for Enhancing the Transparency, Reproducibility and Communication of the Benefit–Risk Balance of Medicines , 2011, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[14]  Louis P Garrison,et al.  Assessing a structured, quantitative health outcomes approach to drug risk-benefit analysis. , 2007, Health affairs.

[15]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Exploring a structured decision approach as a means of fostering participatory space policy making at NASA , 2002 .

[16]  Donna Rowen,et al.  Mapping to obtain EQ-5D utility values for use in NICE health technology assessments. , 2013, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[17]  Lawrence D. Phillips,et al.  Benefit-risk methodology project:work package 1 report: description of the current practice of benefit-risk assessment for centralised procedure products in the EU regulatory network , 2011 .

[18]  Nan Wang,et al.  Benefit–risk assessment in a post‐market setting: a case study integrating real‐life experience into benefit–risk methodology , 2014, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[19]  H. Eichler,et al.  Safe drugs and the cost of good intentions. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  S. Walker,et al.  Is there a need for a universal benefit–risk assessment framework for medicines? Regulatory and industry perspectives , 2013, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[21]  L. Phillips,et al.  Balancing benefit and risk of medicines: a systematic review and classification of available methodologies , 2014, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[22]  M. Buxton,et al.  Prioritisation of health technology assessment. The PATHS model: methods and case studies. , 2003, Health technology assessment.