Three-dimensional isogeometrically enriched finite elements for frictional contact and mixed-mode debonding

Abstract We present an isogeometric enrichment technique for three-dimensional finite element computations applied to frictional contact and mixed-mode debonding. This is an extension of previous work that focused on two-dimensional and frictionless problems. To offer a more complete view of the enriched element’s performance, a comparison of the results to tri-variate isogeometric discretizations and standard Lagrangian elements is also included here. The enrichment is applied by discretizing parts of the surface that require higher accuracy with isogeometric basis functions, while the rest of the body uses Lagrangian shape functions. By using an isogeometric surface representation, the higher continuity across element boundaries and higher order of interpolation can be exploited. At the same time, the generation of tri-variate isogeometric meshes is avoided. A convergence study without any surface effects, involving only volume integrals, shows that the enriched elements can also be beneficial for these problems. The major advantage of the isogeometric element enrichment over standard tri-linear elements is demonstrated in contact problems including normal and tangential tractions. For both, mixed-mode cohesive debonding and frictional contact, the enrichment increases robustness and leads to more accurate results than standard linear Lagrangian elements. All computations are also compared to results using tri-variate isogeometric discretizations to give a complete picture of the element’s performance. It is also shown that the proposed enrichment formulation has advantages in mesh generation.

[1]  T. Hughes,et al.  Solid T-spline construction from boundary representations for genus-zero geometry , 2012 .

[2]  Roger A. Sauer,et al.  Stabilized finite element formulations for liquid membranes and their application to droplet contact , 2014 .

[3]  T. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric analysis : CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement , 2005 .

[4]  Roger A. Sauer,et al.  Local finite element enrichment strategies for 2D contact computations and a corresponding post-processing scheme , 2013 .

[5]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  An isogeometric approach to cohesive zone modeling , 2011 .

[6]  I. Temizer,et al.  Multiscale thermomechanical contact: Computational homogenization with isogeometric analysis , 2014 .

[7]  P. Wriggers,et al.  Isogeometric large deformation frictionless contact using T-splines , 2014 .

[8]  Roger A. Sauer,et al.  A computational contact formulation based on surface potentials , 2013 .

[9]  Roger A. Sauer,et al.  Enriched contact finite elements for stable peeling computations , 2011 .

[10]  Giulio Alfano,et al.  Adaptive hierarchical enrichment for delamination fracture using a decohesive zone model , 2002 .

[11]  John A. Evans,et al.  An Isogeometric design-through-analysis methodology based on adaptive hierarchical refinement of NURBS, immersed boundary methods, and T-spline CAD surfaces , 2012 .

[12]  Peter Wriggers,et al.  Computational Contact Mechanics , 2002 .

[13]  John A. Evans,et al.  Isogeometric finite element data structures based on Bézier extraction of NURBS , 2011 .

[14]  John A. Evans,et al.  Isogeometric collocation: Neumann boundary conditions and contact , 2015 .

[15]  P. Wriggers,et al.  NURBS- and T-spline-based isogeometric cohesive zone modeling of interface debonding , 2014 .

[16]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Trivariate solid T-spline construction from boundary triangulations with arbitrary genus topology , 2012, Comput. Aided Des..

[17]  Xiaopeng Xu,et al.  Void nucleation by inclusion debonding in a crystal matrix , 1993 .

[18]  J. M. Cascón,et al.  A new approach to solid modeling with trivariate T-splines based on mesh optimization , 2011 .

[19]  H. Redkey,et al.  A new approach. , 1967, Rehabilitation record.

[20]  Roger A. Sauer,et al.  An unbiased computational contact formulation for 3D friction , 2015 .

[21]  P. Wriggers Nonlinear Finite Element Methods , 2008 .

[22]  Marlon Franke,et al.  Isogeometric Analysis and thermomechanical Mortar contact problems , 2014 .

[23]  Roger A. Sauer,et al.  NURBS-enriched contact finite elements , 2014 .

[24]  J. C. Simo,et al.  Geometrically non‐linear enhanced strain mixed methods and the method of incompatible modes , 1992 .

[25]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Volumetric T-spline construction using Boolean operations , 2014, Engineering with Computers.

[26]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  The Finite Element Method for Solid and Structural Mechanics , 2013 .

[27]  Pierre Alliez,et al.  Integer-grid maps for reliable quad meshing , 2013, ACM Trans. Graph..

[28]  Roger A. Sauer,et al.  A computational formulation for constrained solid and liquid membranes considering isogeometric finite elements , 2012, ArXiv.

[29]  T. Laursen Computational Contact and Impact Mechanics: Fundamentals of Modeling Interfacial Phenomena in Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis , 2002 .

[30]  Stanisław Stupkiewicz,et al.  Extension of the node‐to‐segment contact element for surface‐expansion‐dependent contact laws , 2001 .