Behavior under the microscope: Increasing the resolution of our experimental procedures

Behavior analysis has exploited conceptual tools whose experimental validity has been amply demonstrated, but their relevance to large-scale and fine-grained behavioral phenomena remains uncertain, because the experimental analysis of these domains faces formidable obstacles of measurement and control. In this essay I suggest that, at least at the fine-grained end of the behavioral spectrum, we have not taken sufficient advantage of all available procedures. Specifically, I propose that an examination of eye movements, joint control, and response latency in intraverbal tasks might help us to formulate more complete accounts of complex human behavior.

[1]  B Lowenkron,et al.  Joint control and the generalization of selection-based verbal behavior , 1991, The Analysis of verbal behavior.

[2]  L. Balsamo,et al.  Observing Behavior Topography in Delayed Matching to Multiple Samples , 2006 .

[3]  Ian Stewart,et al.  Derived stimulus relations, semantic priming, and event-related potentials: testing a behavioral theory of semantic networks. , 2005, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[4]  David C. Palmer,et al.  THE INTERPRETATION OF COMPLEX HUMAN BEHAVIOR: SOME REACTIONS TO PARALLEL DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING, EDITED BY J. L. McCLELLAND, D. E. RUMELHART, AND THE PDP RESEARCH GROUP1 , 1989 .

[5]  B Lowenkron,et al.  Some logical functions of joint control. , 1998, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[6]  B. Skinner,et al.  Giving up the ghost , 1981, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[7]  B. Skinner,et al.  Reflections on behaviorism and society , 1978 .

[8]  D. Hull,et al.  A general account of selection: Biology, immunology, and behavior , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[9]  D. Palmer,et al.  The Speaker as Listener: The Interpretation of Structural Regularities in Verbal Behavior , 1998, The Analysis of verbal behavior.

[10]  J G Holland,et al.  Operant control of eye movements. , 1968, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[11]  K. Rayner.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  B. Lowenkron.  Instructional control of generalized relational matching to sample in children. , 1989, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[13]  Sigrid S. Glenn,et al.  At last: Serious consideration , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[14]  D. Palmer.  Response strength and the concept of the repertoire , 2009 .

[15]  D C Palmer,et al.  Achieving parity: The role of automatic reinforcement. , 1996, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[16]  B. Lowenkron.  Coding responses and the generalization of matching to sample in children. , 1984, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[17]  S. Schroeder,et al.  REINFORCEMENT OF EYE MOVEMENT WITH CONCURRENT SCHEDULES1 , 1969 .

[18]  J. Holland,et al.  Operant Control of Eye Movements during Human Vigilance , 1968, Science.

[19]  David C. Palmer,et al.  Learning and Complex Behavior , 1993 .

[20]  H. Schlinger.  Listening is behaving verbally , 2008, The Behavior analyst.

[21]  B. Lowenkron.  Generalization of delayed identity matching in retarded children. , 1988, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[22]  S. Hayes,et al.  Derived Stimulus Relations Produce Mediated and Episodic Priming , 1998 .

[23]  K. Wilkinson,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of stimulus equivalence processes. , 2009, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[24]  Sigrid S. Glenn,et al.  Complexity and Selection: Implications for Organizational Change , 2004 .