Critical Shoulder Angle and Acromial Index Do Not Influence 24-Month Functional Outcome After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Background: Recent studies have shown a correlation between scapular geometry and the development of atraumatic rotator cuff tears. However, a paucity of literature is available on the effects of critical shoulder angle (CSA) and acromial index (AI) on functional outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose was to investigate the influence of CSA and AI on 24-month functional outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The hypothesis was that a larger CSA or AI would result in poorer postoperative outcomes. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The study included 147 patients who underwent arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair for radiologically documented full-thickness supraspinatus tears. An independent reviewer measured the CSA and AI on preoperative radiographs. These patients were prospectively enrolled and were evaluated preoperatively as well as at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Functional outcome was assessed with the Constant Shoulder Score (CSS), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), and University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder Rating Scale. The patients were first divided based on CSA: (1) ≤35° (control CSA) and (2) >35° (increased CSA); and then based on AI: (1) ≤0.7 and (2) >0.7. The Student unpaired t test, Pearson chi-square test, and Pearson correlation were performed to examine the influence of CSA and AI on postoperative functional outcome scores. Results: At 6 months of follow-up, the CSS, OSS, and UCLA Shoulder Rating Scale were 10 ± 1, 4 ± 2, and 3 ± 1 points poorer in the increased CSA group compared with the control CSA group (P = .005, P = .030, and P = .035, respectively). These scores were not significantly different between both AI groups. By 24 months of follow-up, all outcome scores were comparable between both CSA groups as well as between both AI groups. No significant correlation was found between either CSA or AI when compared with CSS, OSS, or UCLA Shoulder Rating Scale at 24 months of follow-up. Conclusion: CSA and AI do not appear to influence 24-month functional outcomes postoperatively and hence are not contraindications to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

[1]  A. Giani,et al.  Predominance of the critical shoulder angle in the pathogenesis of degenerative diseases of the shoulder. , 2016, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[2]  C. Gerber,et al.  A larger critical shoulder angle requires more rotator cuff activity to preserve joint stability , 2016, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[3]  T. Turnbull,et al.  The Effects of Arthroscopic Lateral Acromioplasty on the Critical Shoulder Angle and the Anterolateral Deltoid Origin: An Anatomic Cadaveric Study. , 2016, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[4]  M. Bordalo-Rodrigues,et al.  Serial structural MRI evaluation of arthroscopy rotator cuff repair: does Sugaya’s classification correlate with the postoperative clinical outcomes? , 2016, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[5]  M. Kääb,et al.  Erratum to: Arthroscopic lateral acromion resection (ALAR) optimizes rotator cuff tear relevant scapula parameters , 2016, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[6]  G. Osterhoff,et al.  Inclination-dependent changes of the critical shoulder angle significantly influence superior glenohumeral joint stability. , 2016, Clinical biomechanics.

[7]  M. Kääb,et al.  Arthroscopic lateral acromion resection (ALAR) optimizes rotator cuff tear relevant scapula parameters , 2016, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[8]  P. Millett,et al.  The critical shoulder angle is associated with rotator cuff tears and shoulder osteoarthritis and is better assessed with radiographs over MRI , 2016, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[9]  M. Balke,et al.  Differences in acromial morphology of shoulders in patients with degenerative and traumatic supraspinatus tendon tears , 2016, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[10]  C Gerber,et al.  Age, trauma and the critical shoulder angle accurately predict supraspinatus tendon tears. , 2014, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[11]  Jess G Snedeker,et al.  Supraspinatus tendon load during abduction is dependent on the size of the critical shoulder angle: A biomechanical analysis , 2014, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[12]  S. Bouaicha,et al.  Comparison of the critical shoulder angle in radiographs and computed tomography , 2014, Skeletal Radiology.

[13]  E. Kelvin,et al.  Munro's statistical methods for health care research , 2013 .

[14]  T. Vahlberg,et al.  Investigating minimal clinically important difference for Constant score in patients undergoing rotator cuff surgery. , 2013, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[15]  C. Gerber,et al.  Latissimus dorsi tendon transfer for treatment of irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears: long-term results at a minimum follow-up of ten years. , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  C. Gerber,et al.  Is there an association between the individual anatomy of the scapula and the development of rotator cuff tears or osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint?: A radiological study of the critical shoulder angle. , 2013, The bone & joint journal.

[17]  Eiji Itoi,et al.  Prevalence of symptomatic and asymptomatic rotator cuff tears in the general population: From mass-screening in one village. , 2013, Journal of orthopaedics.

[18]  O. van der Meijden,et al.  Association between acromial index and outcomes following arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  E. Itoi,et al.  Comparison between the acromion index and rotator cuff tears in the Brazilian and Japanese populations. , 2011, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[20]  P. Habermeyer,et al.  Is there an association between a low acromion index and osteoarthritis of the shoulder? , 2010, International Orthopaedics.

[21]  Y. Rhee,et al.  The Factors Affecting the Clinical Outcome and Integrity of Arthroscopically Repaired Rotator Cuff Tears of the Shoulder , 2009, Clinics in orthopedic surgery.

[22]  C. Gerber,et al.  The clinical and structural long-term results of open repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  A. Carr,et al.  The use of a patient-based questionnaire (the Oxford Shoulder Score) to assess outcome after rotator cuff repair. , 2008, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[24]  C. Gerber,et al.  Association of a large lateral extension of the acromion with rotator cuff tears. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  L. Soslowsky,et al.  Rotator Cuff Tendinosis in an Animal Model: Role of Extrinsic and Overuse Factors , 2002, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  Cari R. Bryant,et al.  Glenoid Inclination is Associated With Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[27]  T. Gill,et al.  The relative importance of acromial morphology and age with respect to rotator cuff pathology. , 2002, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[28]  G Trudel,et al.  Histologic evidence of degeneration at the insertion of 3 rotator cuff tendons: a comparative study with human cadaveric shoulders. , 1999, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[29]  Y Nakagawa,et al.  Epidemiologic study of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with plain radiography. , 1999, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[30]  V. Mow,et al.  The relationship of acromial architecture to rotator cuff disease. , 1991, Clinics in sports medicine.

[31]  C. Constant,et al.  A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. , 1987, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.