No paper, but the same routines: a qualitative exploration of experiences in two Norwegian hospitals deprived of the paper based medical record

BackgroundIt has been shown that implementation of electronic medical records (EMR) and withdrawal of the paper-based medical record is feasible, but represents a drastic change in the information environment of hospital physicians. Previous investigations have revealed considerable inter-hospital variations in EMR system use and user satisfaction. The aim of this study was to further explore changes of clinicians' work after the EMR system implementation process and how they experienced working in a paper-deprived information environment.MethodsQualitative study based on 18 semi-structured interviews with physicians in two Norwegian hospitals.ResultsTen different but related characteristics of work within the EMR-based practice were identified; (1) there was closer clinical and administrative cooperation during the implementation processes; (2) there were greater benefits when everybody used the system; (3) systems supported freshmen better than experienced physicians; (4) the EMR was useful in regard to professional learning; (5) new users were given an introduction to the system by experienced; (6) younger clinicians reported different attitudes than senior clinicians, but this might be related to more than age and previous experience with computers; (7) the EMR made it easier to generate free-text notes, but this also created a potential for information overflow; (8) there is little or no support for mobile work; (9) instances of downtime are still experienced, and this influenced the attitude towards the system and (10) clinicians preferred EMR-only compared to combined paper and electronic systems.ConclusionDespite the removal of paper-based records from clinical workflow (a change that hospital clinicians perceived as highly useful), many of the old routines remained unchanged, limiting the potential of the EMR system. Thus, there is a need to not only remove paper in the physical sense, but also to established routines to fully achieve the benefits of an EMR system.

[1]  E Monteiro,et al.  Big is Beautiful: Electronic Patient Records in Large Norwegian Hospitals 1980s – 2001 , 2003, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[2]  Benjamin B. M. Shao,et al.  The relationship between user participation and system success: a simultaneous contingency approach , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[3]  L R Burns,et al.  Physicians and Organizations: Strange Bedfellows or a Marriage Made in Heaven? , 1998, Frontiers of health services management.

[4]  Eivind Vedvik,et al.  The fate of clinical department systems at the dawn of hospital-wide Electronic health records in a Norwegian university hospital , 2006, MIE.

[5]  Arild Faxvaag,et al.  Research Paper: Effects of Scanning and Eliminating Paper-based Medical Records on Hospital Physicians' Clinical Work Practice , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[6]  Marc Berg,et al.  Considerations for sociotechnical design: experiences with an electronic patient record in a clinical context , 1998, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[7]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[8]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Managing the care of health and the cure of disease--Part II: Integration. , 2001, Health care management review.

[9]  H. Lærum,et al.  Doctors' use of electronic medical records systems in hospitals: cross sectional survey , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  Marc Berg,et al.  Patient care information systems and health care work: a sociotechnical approach , 1999, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[11]  Arild Faxvaag,et al.  Removal of paper-based health records from Norwegian hospitals: Effects on clinical workflow , 2006, MIE.

[12]  A. K. Geddes,et al.  The Child in America: Behavior Problems and Programs. , 1929 .

[13]  Gilad J. Kuperman,et al.  Synthesis of Research Paper: A Consensus Statement on Considerations for a Successful CPOE Implementation , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[14]  D. Coplen.  Types of Unintended Consequences Related to Computerized Provider Order Entry , 2007 .

[15]  Marc Berg,et al.  Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[16]  Bradley D. Hiquet,et al.  Sap R/3 Implementation Guide: A Manager's Guide to Understanding Sap , 1998 .

[17]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[18]  Joan S. Ash,et al.  Research Paper: Types of Unintended Consequences Related to Computerized Provider Order Entry , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[19]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Managing the care of health and the cure of disease--Part I: Differentiation. , 2001, Health care management review.

[20]  Marion J. Ball,et al.  Hospital information systems: perspectives on problems and prospects, 1979 and 2002 , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[21]  Eric G. Poon,et al.  Research Paper: The Extent and Importance of Unintended Consequences Related to Computerized Provider Order Entry , 2007, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[22]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[23]  Angèle L. M. Cavaye,et al.  User participation in system development revisited , 1995, Inf. Manag..