Opinions about surrogate designation: a population survey in France.

OBJECTIVE Many patients go through periods when they are too ill to give consent or to participate in decisions. When this occurs, patient autonomy is best maintained when a surrogate designated by the patient and familiar with his or her values can speak for the patient. The objective of this study was to determine whether people who are not yet ill are ready to accept surrogate designation. Attitudes toward family participation in care were explored also. DESIGN Population survey by telephone. Because refusal of life-sustaining treatment is a dramatic example of patient autonomy, the survey used questions about ICU admission. SETTING General population in France. SUBJECTS Representative random sample of 8000 residents of France aged 18 yrs or more. INTERVENTIONS None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The survey investigated attitudes. RESULTS Most respondents said they would like to designate a surrogate (7205 [90%]) and to have their family share in their care (6691 [84%] for bathing, 5629 [70%] for feeding, and 4139 [52%] for tracheal suctioning) and in decisions about their management (6120 [76%]). Among respondents with a spouse, 79% said they would designate the spouse to speak for them. The attitudes were not influenced by ethnicity, religion or education level. CONCLUSIONS Most people living in France would want a surrogate to represent them should they be incompetent and admitted to an ICU. Primary care physicians should inform their patients about the benefits of discussing illness-related issues among friends and family.

[1]  B. Hammes,et al.  Communication, trust, and making choices: advance care planning four years on. , 2004, Journal of palliative medicine.

[2]  François Lemaire,et al.  Impact of a family information leaflet on effectiveness of information provided to family members of intensive care unit patients: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. , 2002, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[3]  J. le Gall,et al.  Symptoms of anxiety and depression in family members of intensive care unit patients: Ethical hypothesis regarding decision-making capacity , 2001, Critical care medicine.

[4]  S. Chevret,et al.  French intensivists do not apply American recommendations regarding decisions to forgo life-sustaining therapy , 2001, Critical care medicine.

[5]  F. Lemaire,et al.  Decision-making capacity and surrogate designation in French ICU patients , 2001, Intensive Care Medicine.

[6]  D. Cook,et al.  Patient autonomy versus parentalism. , 2001, Critical care medicine.

[7]  T. Prendergast,et al.  Advance care planning: pitfalls, progress, promise. , 2001, Critical care medicine.

[8]  L. Ackerson,et al.  Do surrogate decision makers provide accurate consent for intensive care research? , 2001, Chest.

[9]  F. Lemaire,et al.  Withholding and withdrawal of life support in intensive-care units in France: a prospective survey , 2001, The Lancet.

[10]  S Chevret,et al.  Half the families of intensive care unit patients experience inadequate communication with physicians , 2000, Critical care medicine.

[11]  J. Lynn,et al.  Patients Who Want their Family and Physician to Make Resuscitation Decisions for Them: Observations from SUPPORT and HELP , 2000, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[12]  H. Brody,et al.  Physician Recommendations and Patient Autonomy: Finding a Balance between Physician Power and Patient Choice , 1996, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  E. Emanuel,et al.  Preserving the physician-patient relationship in the era of managed care. , 1995, JAMA.

[14]  E. Emanuel,et al.  Four models of the physician-patient relationship. , 1992, JAMA.

[15]  F Lemaire,et al.  Meeting the needs of intensive care unit patient families: a multicenter study. , 2001, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[16]  E. Roupie,et al.  Patients' preferences concerning medical information and surrogacy: results of a prospective study in a French emergency department , 2000, Intensive Care Medicine.