Performance Evaluation of a PEM Scanner Using the NEMA NU 4—2008 Small Animal PET Standards

The recently published NEMA NU 4-2008 Standards has been specially designed for evaluating the performance of small animal PET scanners used in preclinical applications. In this paper, we report on the NU 4 performance of a clinical positron emission mammography (PEM) system. Since there are no PEM specific performance test protocols available, and the NU 2 protocol (intended for whole-body PET scanners) cannot be applied without modification due to the compact design of the PEM scanner, we decided to evaluate the NU 4 Standards as an alternative. We obtained the following results: Trans-axial spatial resolution 1.8 mm FWHM for high resolution reconstruction mode and 2.4 mm FWHM for standard resolution reconstruction mode with no significant variation within the field of view. The total system sensitivity was 0.16 cps/Bq. In image quality testing, the uniformity was found to be 3.9% STD at the standard resolution mode and 5.6% at the high resolution mode when measured with a 34 mm paddle separation. The NEMA NU 4-2008 Standards were found to be a practicable tool to evaluate the performance of the PEM scanner after some modifications to address the specifics of its detector configuration. Furthermore, the PEM scanner's in-plane spatial resolution was comparable to other small animal PET scanners with good image quality.

[1]  Paul E Kinahan,et al.  The positron emission mammography/tomography breast imaging and biopsy system (PEM/PET): design, construction and phantom-based measurements , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Mary Scott Soo,et al.  Detection of primary breast carcinoma with a dedicated, large-field-of-view FDG PET mammography device: initial experience. , 2005, Radiology.

[3]  Pavel Y Stepanov,et al.  Positron Emission Mammography: High-Resolution Biochemical Breast Imaging , 2005, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[4]  M. Desco,et al.  VrPET/CT: Development of a rotating multimodality scanner for small-animal imaging , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[5]  L Peralta,et al.  Clear-PEM: a dedicated PET camera for improved breast cancer detection. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[6]  Marc C. Huisman,et al.  Performance evaluation of the Philips MOSAIC small animal PET scanner , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[7]  S R Cherry,et al.  Design and evaluation of an LSO PET detector for breast cancer imaging. , 2000, Medical physics.

[8]  J. S. Lee,et al.  Performance Measurement of the microPET Focus 120 Scanner , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  P. Olcott,et al.  Study of the performance of a novel 1 mm resolution dual-panel PET camera design dedicated to breast cancer imaging using Monte Carlo simulation. , 2007, Medical physics.

[10]  D.F. Newport,et al.  Performance Evaluation of the microPET®—FOCUS-F120 , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[11]  N. Zhang,et al.  A prototype modular detector design for high resolution positron emission mammography imaging , 2002, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[12]  D. Visvikis,et al.  Design simulation of a rotating dual-headed PET/CT scanner for breast imaging , 2005, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005.

[13]  S. Siegel,et al.  Performance evaluation of the microPET focus: a third-generation microPET scanner dedicated to animal imaging. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  T. Yen,et al.  Performance evaluation of small animal PET system using NEMA standards , 2008 .

[15]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Clinical imaging characteristics of the positron emission mammography PEM Flex Solo II , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[16]  P. Lecoq,et al.  Clear-PEM, a dedicated PET camera for mammography , 2002 .

[17]  João Paulo Teixeira,et al.  Design and evaluation of the clear-PEM scanner for positron emission mammography , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[18]  Andrew G. Weisenberger,et al.  Development of a dedicated positron emission tomography system for the detection and biopsy of breast cancer , 2006 .

[19]  C J Thompson,et al.  Results of preliminary clinical trials of the positron emission mammography system PEM-I: a dedicated breast imaging system producing glucose metabolic images using FDG. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  K. Kitamura,et al.  Reconstruction of 4-Layer DOI detector equipped C-shaped PEM via list-mode iterative algorithm , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[21]  Jurgen Seidel,et al.  Performance evaluation of the GE healthcare eXplore VISTA dual-ring small-animal PET scanner. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  Fabio Morsani,et al.  Development of the YAP-PEM scanner for breast cancer imaging. , 2006, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[23]  S. Majewski,et al.  Light sharing in multi-flat-panel-PMT PEM detectors. , 2006, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[24]  Deepa Narayanan,et al.  High‐Resolution Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography with Compression (“Positron Emission Mammography”) is Highly Accurate in Depicting Primary Breast Cancer , 2006, The breast journal.

[25]  J. Karp,et al.  Design considerations for a limited angle, dedicated breast, TOF PET scanner , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.