ROC curves predicted by a model of visual search

In imaging tasks where the observer is uncertain whether lesions are present, and where they could be present, the image is searched for lesions. In the free-response paradigm, which closely reflects this task, the observer provides data in the form of a variable number of mark-rating pairs per image. In a companion paper a statistical model of visual search has been proposed that has parameters characterizing the perceived lesion signal-to-noise ratio, the ability of the observer to avoid marking non-lesion locations, and the ability of the observer to find lesions. The aim of this work is to relate the search model parameters to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves that would result if the observer reported the rating of the most suspicious finding on an image as the overall rating. Also presented are the probability density functions (pdfs) of the underlying latent decision variables corresponding to the highest rating for normal and abnormal images. The search-model-predicted ROC curves are ‘proper’ in the sense of never crossing the chance diagonal and the slope is monotonically changing. They also have the interesting property of not allowing the observer to move the operating point continuously from the origin to (1, 1). For certain choices of parameters the operating points are predicted to be clustered near the initial steep region of the curve, as has been observed by other investigators. The pdfs are non-Gaussians, markedly so for the abnormal images and for certain choices of parameter values, and provide an explanation for the well-known observation that experimental ROC data generally imply a wider pdf for abnormal images than for normal images. Some features of search-model-predicted ROC curves and pdfs resemble those predicted by the contaminated binormal model, but there are significant differences. The search model appears to provide physical explanations for several aspects of experimental ROC curves.

[1]  Laura Chamberlain Eye Tracking Methodology; Theory and Practice , 2007 .

[2]  D P Chakraborty A search model and figure of merit for observer data acquired according to the free-response paradigm. , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Dev P Chakraborty,et al.  Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation. , 2004, Medical physics.

[4]  Harold L. Kundel,et al.  Modeling visual search during mammogram viewing , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[5]  W. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C++: The Art of Scientific Computing (2nd edn)1 Numerical Recipes Example Book (C++) (2nd edn)2 Numerical Recipes Multi-Language Code CD ROM with LINUX or UNIX Single-Screen License Revised Version3 , 2003 .

[6]  B. Krauskopf,et al.  Proc of SPIE , 2003 .

[7]  Andrew T. Duchowski,et al.  Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice , 2003, Springer London.

[8]  Darrin C. Edwards,et al.  Maximum likelihood fitting of FROC curves under an initial-detection-and-candidate-analysis model. , 2002, Medical physics.

[9]  D Gur,et al.  A constrained formulation for the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve based on probability summation. , 2001, Medical physics.

[10]  Kevin S. Berbaum,et al.  A contaminated binormal model for ROC data , 2000 .

[11]  K S Berbaum,et al.  A contaminated binormal model for ROC data: Part II. A formal model. , 2000, Academic radiology.

[12]  C. Metz,et al.  "Proper" Binormal ROC Curves: Theory and Maximum-Likelihood Estimation. , 1999, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[13]  C. Metz,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  K. Berbaum,et al.  Proper receiver operating characteristic analysis: the bigamma model. , 1997, Academic radiology.

[15]  R. Swensson Unified measurement of observer performance in detecting and localizing target objects on images. , 1996, Medical physics.

[16]  K. Berbaum,et al.  Satisfaction of search in diagnostic radiology. , 1989, Investigative radiology.

[17]  F. A. Seiler,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[18]  C E Metz,et al.  Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. , 1989, Investigative radiology.

[19]  J. Hanley The Robustness of the "Binormal" Assumptions Used in Fitting ROC Curves , 1988, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[20]  C. Nodine,et al.  Using eye movements to study visual search and to improve tumor detection. , 1987, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[21]  C. Metz ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[22]  H L Kundel,et al.  A visual concept shapes image perception. , 1983, Radiology.

[23]  Richard G. Swensson,et al.  A two-stage detection model applied to skilled visual search by radiologists , 1980 .

[24]  C. Metz Basic principles of ROC analysis. , 1978, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[25]  D. Dorfman,et al.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of parameters of signal-detection theory and determination of confidence intervals—Rating-method data , 1969 .

[26]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[27]  Sabrina S Wilson Radiology , 1938, Glasgow Medical Journal.

[28]  R. Fisher,et al.  Limiting forms of the frequency distribution of the largest or smallest member of a sample , 1928, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.