Strategies to mitigate aliasing of loading signals while estimating GPS frame parameters

Although GNSS techniques are theoretically sensitive to the Earth center of mass, it is often preferable to remove intrinsic origin and scale information from the estimated station positions since they are known to be affected by systematic errors. This is usually done by estimating the parameters of a linearized similarity transformation which relates the quasi-instantaneous frames to a long-term frame such as the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF). It is well known that non-linear station motions can partially alias into these parameters. We discuss in this paper some procedures that may allow reducing these aliasing effects in the case of the GPS techniques. The options include the use of well-distributed sub-networks for the frame transformation estimation, the use of site loading corrections, a modification of the stochastic model by downweighting heights, or the joint estimation of the low degrees of the deformation field. We confirm that the standard approach consisting of estimating the transformation over the whole network is particularly harmful for the loading signals if the network is not well distributed. Downweighting the height component, using a uniform sub-network, or estimating the deformation field perform similarly in drastically reducing the amplitude of the aliasing effect. The application of these methods to reprocessed GPS terrestrial frames permits an assessment of the level of agreement between GPS and our loading model, which is found to be about 1.5 mm WRMS in height and 0.8 mm WRMS in the horizontal at the annual frequency. Aliased loading signals are not the main source of discrepancies between loading displacement models and GPS position time series.

[1]  Jeffrey P. Walker,et al.  THE GLOBAL LAND DATA ASSIMILATION SYSTEM , 2004 .

[2]  Geoffrey Blewitt,et al.  Effect of annual signals on geodetic velocity , 2002 .

[3]  Geoffrey Blewitt,et al.  Crustal displacements due to continental water loading , 2001 .

[4]  Xavier Collilieux,et al.  Quality assessment of GPS reprocessed terrestrial reference frame , 2011 .

[5]  Xavier Collilieux,et al.  Comparison of very long baseline interferometry, GPS, and satellite laser ranging height residuals from ITRF2005 using spectral and correlation methods , 2007 .

[6]  M. Rothacher,et al.  Low-degree earth deformation from reprocessed GPS observations , 2010 .

[7]  Xavier Collilieux,et al.  Impact of loading effects on determination of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame , 2010 .

[8]  Jikun Ou,et al.  Robust estimation for correlated observations: two local sensitivity-based downweighting strategies , 2010 .

[9]  M. Heflin,et al.  Atmospheric pressure loading effects on Global Positioning System coordinate determinations , 1994 .

[10]  J. Ray,et al.  Anomalous harmonics in the spectra of GPS position estimates , 2008 .

[11]  Walter H. F. Smith,et al.  Free software helps map and display data , 1991 .

[12]  W. Farrell Deformation of the Earth by surface loads , 1972 .

[13]  J. Ray,et al.  Effect of the satellite laser ranging network distribution on geocenter motion estimation , 2009 .

[14]  Michael B. Heflin,et al.  Site distribution and aliasing effects in the inversion for load coefficients and geocenter motion from GPS data , 2002 .

[15]  Michael B. Heflin,et al.  Large‐scale global surface mass variations inferred from GPS measurements of load‐induced deformation , 2003 .

[16]  Leonid Petrov,et al.  Study of the atmospheric pressure loading signal in very long baseline interferometry observations , 2003, physics/0311096.

[17]  Jean-François Crétaux,et al.  Annual vertical crustal motions predicted from surface mass redistribution and observed by space geodesy , 2001 .

[18]  Z. Altamimi,et al.  ITRF2005 : A new release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame based on time series of station positions and Earth Orientation Parameters , 2007 .

[19]  Peter J. Clarke,et al.  Geocenter motions from GPS: A unified observation model , 2006 .

[20]  G. Blewitt Self‐consistency in reference frames, geocenter definition, and surface loading of the solid Earth , 2003 .

[21]  J. Wahr,et al.  The viscoelastic relaxation of a realistically stratified earth, and a further analysis of postglacial rebound , 1995 .

[22]  Thomas A. Herring,et al.  Detection of atmospheric pressure loading using very long baseline interferometry measurements , 1994 .

[23]  T. van Dam,et al.  Effects of atmospheric pressure loading and seven-parameter transformations on estimates of geocenter motion and station heights from space geodetic observations , 2005 .

[24]  Carl Wunsch,et al.  State estimation improves prospects for ocean research , 2002 .

[25]  Z. Altamimi,et al.  ITRF2008: an improved solution of the international terrestrial reference frame , 2011 .