Ultrasonic guided wave monitoring of an operational rail track

An experimental monitoring system was installed on an operational heavy haul rail track. The system used two piezoelectric transducers mounted under the head of the rail to transmit and receive ultrasonic guided waves in pulse-echo mode and data were captured over a 2-week period. An artificial defect was introduced by glueing a small mass under the head of the rail at a distance of 370 m from the transducers. The size of the signal reflected by the mass varied as the glue joint deteriorated. The measurements were reordered to simulate a monotonically growing defect. The pre-processing of the captured time signals included averaging, filtering, phased array processing, dispersion compensation, signal stretching and amplitude scaling. Singular value decomposition and independent component analysis of the data were performed. Independent component analysis, with dimension reduction achieved by retaining only the larger principal components, produced the best defect detection. The defect signature was separated as an independent component, and the weight of this component increased monotonically. The results indicate that a transverse defect in the rail head could be detected and located at long range by a system comprising only two transducers. The variation of the signals due to changing environmental and operational conditions limits the size of defect that can be detected, but it is expected that even a relatively small defect, which is significantly smaller than the critical size, would be detected.

[1]  P. Wilcox,et al.  Post-processing of the full matrix of ultrasonic transmit-receive array data for non-destructive evaluation , 2005 .

[2]  J. B. Harley,et al.  Scale transform signal processing for optimal ultrasonic temperature compensation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[3]  Tat-Hean Gan,et al.  An Intelligent Methodology for Railways Monitoring Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves , 2014 .

[4]  Paul D. Wilcox,et al.  Strategies for Guided Wave Structural Health Monitoring , 2007 .

[5]  Craig S Long,et al.  Estimation of rail properties using semi-analytical finite element models and guided wave ultrasound measurements. , 2019, Ultrasonics.

[6]  Francois A. Burger,et al.  A Practical Continuous Operating Rail Break Detection System Using Guided Waves , 2012 .

[7]  Peter Cawley,et al.  Independent Component Analysis for Improved Defect Detection in Guided Wave Monitoring , 2016, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[8]  Craig S. Long,et al.  Long range guided wave defect monitoring in rail track , 2014 .

[9]  L. Gavric Computation of propagative waves in free rail using a finite element technique , 1995 .

[10]  Paul D. Wilcox,et al.  LONG RANGE INSPECTION OF RAIL USING GUIDED WAVES , 2003 .

[11]  Peter Cawley,et al.  Efficient generation of receiver operating characteristics for the evaluation of damage detection in practical structural health monitoring applications , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[12]  P.D. Wilcox,et al.  A rapid signal processing technique to remove the effect of dispersion from guided wave signals , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[13]  Fabien Treyssède,et al.  Numerical modeling of guided wave interaction with non-axisymmetric cracks in elastic cylinders , 2011 .

[14]  Paul D. Wilcox,et al.  Guided‐Wave Array Methods , 2009 .

[15]  Mario Bergés,et al.  Robust ultrasonic damage detection under complex environmental conditions using singular value decomposition. , 2015, Ultrasonics.

[16]  Prediction of guided wave scattering by defects in rails using numerical modelling , 2014 .

[17]  P. Loveday,et al.  Monitoring the reflection from an artificial defect in rail track using guided wave ultrasound , 2018 .

[18]  David Y. Jeong Correlations Between Rail Defect Growth Data and Engineering Analyses, Part II: Field Tests , 2003 .

[19]  Philip W. Loveday,et al.  Development of an optimal piezoelectric transducer to excite guided waves in a rail web , 2018 .

[20]  Erkki Oja,et al.  Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications , 2000, Neural Networks.

[21]  Philip W. Loveday,et al.  Guided Wave Inspection and Monitoring of Railway Track , 2012 .

[22]  Jochen Moll,et al.  Efficient temperature compensation strategies for guided wave structural health monitoring. , 2010, Ultrasonics.

[23]  Craig S. Long,et al.  Large scale implementation of guided wave based broken rail monitoring , 2015 .

[24]  Peter Cawley,et al.  Structural health monitoring: Closing the gap between research and industrial deployment , 2018 .

[25]  D Y Jeong CORRELATIONS BETWEEN RAIL DEFECT GROWTH DATA AND ENGINEERING ANALYSES, PART I: LABORATORY TESTS , 2003 .

[26]  P. Loveday,et al.  Mode repulsion of ultrasonic guided waves in rails , 2018, Ultrasonics.

[27]  S. L. Grassie,et al.  Rail defects: an overview , 2003 .

[28]  P.W. Loveday,et al.  Analysis of Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Transducers Attached to Waveguides Using Waveguide Finite Elements , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[29]  M Ph Papaelias,et al.  A review on non-destructive evaluation of rails: State-of-the-art and future development , 2008 .

[30]  P. Loveday,et al.  Simulation of piezoelectric excitation of guided waves using waveguide finite elements , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.