Nowadays, many illnesses as for example HIV/AIDS, cancer or psychological diseases are seen by the medical community as being chronic-like diseases. For treating such diseases, physicians often adopt explicit, operationalized series of decision rules specifying how treatment level and type should vary overtime. These rules are referred to in the medical community as dynamic treatment regime or DTR in short. Designing DTR for such diseases is a challenging issue. Among the difficulties encountered, we can mention the poor compliance to treatments due to the side effects associated to some drugs (e.g., chemotherapies can decrease significantly the quality of life of some patients), the decrease of treatment efficiency with time (e.g., apparition of drugresistant HIV viruses after several years of treatment) and the enormous cost of administrating drugs to patients over periods ranging sometimes to tens of years. To a large extent DTR are nowadays based on clinical judgment and medical instinct rather than on a formal and systematic data-driven process that could reveal itself to be more efficient. These latter ten years, one has seen the emergence among the biostatistics community of a research field addressing specifically problems of inference of DTR from clinical data. While this research field is still young, encouraging results have already been published. We mention for example [1] where the authors propose such an approach for designing treatments for psychotic patients.
[1]
Pierre Geurts,et al.
Extremely randomized trees
,
2006,
Machine Learning.
[2]
Pierre Geurts,et al.
Tree-Based Batch Mode Reinforcement Learning
,
2005,
J. Mach. Learn. Res..
[3]
S. Murphy,et al.
An experimental design for the development of adaptive treatment strategies
,
2005,
Statistics in medicine.
[4]
C. Strobl.
Variable Selection in Classification Trees Based on Imprecise Probabilities
,
2005,
ISIPTA.
[5]
R. Kane,et al.
Methodology for measuring health-state preferences--II: Scaling methods.
,
1989,
Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[6]
Louis Wehenkel,et al.
Automatic Learning Techniques in Power Systems
,
1997
.
[7]
Carolin Strobl,et al.
Variable Selection Bias in Classification Trees Based on Imprecise Probabilities
,
2005
.
[8]
Wen Cui.
Variable selection: empirical Bayes vs. fully Bayes
,
2002
.
[9]
E. George,et al.
APPROACHES FOR BAYESIAN VARIABLE SELECTION
,
1997
.