Is Ethics Really Such a Big Deal? The Influence of Perceived Usefulness of AI-based Surveillance Technology on Ethical Decision-Making in Scenarios of Public Surveillance

So far, ethical perspectives have been neglected in empirical research focusing on the acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI)-based surveillance technologies on an individual level. This paper addresses this research gap by examining the individual moral intent to accept AI-based surveillance technologies deployed in public scenarios. After a thorough literature review to identify antecedents of moral intent, we surveyed n = 112 American participants in an online survey on mTurk and analyzed the data by using a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis. The resulting antecedent configurations provide insights into the inherent ethical decisionmaking process and thus contribute to a better understanding of the causality for accepting or rejecting AI-based surveillance technologies. Our findings emphasize in particular the influence of perceived usefulness of the technology on the ethical decisionmaking process.

[1]  Jürgen Beyerer,et al.  TAM-VS: A Technology Acceptance Model for Video Surveillance , 2014, APF.

[2]  M. Mello,et al.  Ethics and governance for digital disease surveillance , 2020, Science.

[3]  Thomas Hess,et al.  Why Are Consumers Willing to Pay for Privacy? An Application of the Privacy-freemium Model to Media Companies , 2015, ECIS.

[4]  Thomas Greckhamer,et al.  CEO compensation in relation to worker compensation across countries: The configurational impact of country-level institutions , 2016 .

[5]  Keng Siau,et al.  Building Trust in Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Robotics , 2018 .

[6]  Russell Haines,et al.  Fairness, Guilt, and Perceived Importance as Antecedents of Intellectual Property Piracy Intentions , 2007, ICIS.

[7]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Toward Ethical Information Systems: The Contribution of Discourse Ethics , 2010, MIS Q..

[8]  G. L. Sanders,et al.  Do Artists Benefit from Online Music Sharing? , 2004 .

[9]  Donald P. Robin,et al.  The Perceived Importance of an Ethical Issue as an Influence on the Ethical Decision-Making of Ad Managers , 1996 .

[10]  Tim Weitzel,et al.  Conversational Agents in Healthcare: Using QCA to Explain Patients' Resistance to Chatbots for Medication , 2019, CONVERSATIONS.

[11]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  Winnie Picoto,et al.  Applying Configurational Theory to Understand Mobile App Success , 2016, ECIS.

[13]  Laura A. Dabbish,et al.  Privacy Attitudes of Mechanical Turk Workers and the U.S. Public , 2014, SOUPS.

[14]  Christopher G. Reddick,et al.  Public opinion on National Security Agency surveillance programs: A multi-method approach , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[15]  Timothy Paul Cronan,et al.  Modeling IT Ethics: A Study in Situational Ethics , 1998, MIS Q..

[16]  Eva Thomann,et al.  Designing Research With Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Approaches, Challenges, and Tools , 2020 .

[17]  Sandra Lowe,et al.  Redesigning Social Inquiry Fuzzy Sets And Beyond , 2016 .

[18]  Ya Wang,et al.  Face recognition in real-world surveillance videos with deep learning method , 2017, 2017 2nd International Conference on Image, Vision and Computing (ICIVC).

[19]  A. Woodside,et al.  Who Approves Fraudulence? Configurational Causes of Consumers’ Unethical Judgments , 2019 .

[20]  Bill Riddler Smith,et al.  Don’t Get Lost in the Crowd: Best Practices for Using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk in Behavioral Research , 2019, Journal of the Midwest Association for Information Systems.

[21]  Russell Haines,et al.  Situational influences on ethical decision-making in an IT context , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[22]  T. McGill,et al.  Privacy Concerns and Acceptance of Government Surveillance in Australia , 2018, ACIS.

[23]  Nguyen Dinh Tho,et al.  Can knowledge be transferred from business schools to business organizations through in-service training students? SEM and fsQCA findings , 2015 .

[24]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Between Complexity and Parsimony: Limited Diversity, Counterfactual Cases, and Comparative Analysis. , 2005 .

[25]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[26]  M. Sarstedt,et al.  A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling , 2015 .

[27]  Dubravka Cecez-Kecmanovic,et al.  IS Serving the Community: The Pragmatic, the Ethical and the Moral Questions , 2015, ICIS.

[28]  Kenneth L. Kraft,et al.  Personal Characteristics Underlying Ethical Decisions in Marketing Situations: A Survey of Small Business Managers** , 2008 .

[29]  John R. Drake.  Review of Instruments to Measure Ethical Decisionmaking and Implications for Decision Support , 2009, AMCIS.

[30]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage , 2006, Political Analysis.

[31]  Daniel B. Neill.  New Directions in Artificial Intelligence for Public Health Surveillance , 2012, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[32]  James R. Rest.  Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory , 1986 .

[33]  Eva-Maria Trüdinger,et al.  Trusting and controlling? Political trust, information and acceptance of surveillance policies: The case of Germany , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[34]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[35]  Stefan Stieglitz,et al.  Emotions and Information Diffusion in Social Media—Sentiment of Microblogs and Sharing Behavior , 2013, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[36]  R. Bawack.  Artificial Intelligence in Practice : Implications for Information Systems Research , 2019 .

[37]  Mark S. Schwartz,et al.  Ethical Decision-Making Theory: An Integrated Approach , 2016 .

[38]  Donald P. Robin,et al.  Toward the Development of a Multidimensional Scale for Improving Evaluations of Business Ethics , 1990 .

[39]  E. Adashi,et al.  AI Surveillance during Pandemics: Ethical Implementation Imperatives , 2020, The Hastings Center report.

[40]  Tania Reynoldsa,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 2020 .

[41]  Tamara Dinev,et al.  Internet privacy concerns and beliefs about government surveillance - An empirical investigation , 2008, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[42]  Peer C. Fiss.  Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research , 2011 .

[43]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[44]  Charles D. Raab,et al.  Information privacy, impact assessment, and the place of ethics⁎ , 2020, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[45]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[46]  M. Roxas,et al.  The Importance of gender Across Cultures in Ethical Decision-making , 2004 .

[47]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[48]  Lori N. K. Leonard,et al.  What influences IT ethical behavior intentions - planned behavior, reasoned action, perceived importance, or individual characteristics? , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[49]  T. Jones.  Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model , 1991 .

[50]  S. Hunt,et al.  A General Theory of Marketing Ethics , 1986 .